Cargando…

Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the difference between choroidal thickness (CT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal subjects and to compare the CT measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komma, Swetha, Chhablani, Jay, Ali, Mohammed Hasnat, Garudadri, Chandra S, Senthil, Sirisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000258
_version_ 1783440250944618496
author Komma, Swetha
Chhablani, Jay
Ali, Mohammed Hasnat
Garudadri, Chandra S
Senthil, Sirisha
author_facet Komma, Swetha
Chhablani, Jay
Ali, Mohammed Hasnat
Garudadri, Chandra S
Senthil, Sirisha
author_sort Komma, Swetha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the difference between choroidal thickness (CT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal subjects and to compare the CT measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional observational study included 25 eyes of 17 POAG subjects (cases) and 31 eyes of 20 normal subjects (controls). All the patients underwent complete ophthalmologic examination, enhanced depth imaging, SD-OCT and SS-OCT. In both controls and cases, the CT was measured in seven predetermined points in macular and peripapillary area and were compared. RESULTS: Choroid was significantly thicker on SS-OCT compared with SD-OCT in peripapillary and macular area in both cases and controls, except for inferior peripapillary in controls. The CT was not different from glaucoma and controls in peripapillary or macular area on SD-OCT (p>0.05), however, the CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT (p<0.05) except inferior peripapillary (p=0.13). There was good intraobserver (±20 µm) and interobserver (±55 µm and ±45 µm) agreement on both SD-OCT and SS-OCT respectively. On SD-OCT, choroid was thinnest at the temporal peripapillary and thickest at subfoveal location in controls. In POAG, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary region and thickest (500 µm) nasal to the fovea. On SS-OCT, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary and thickest at the temporal peripapillary area in both cases and controls. CONCLUSION: CT measurements on SS-OCT were higher than the SD-OCT measurements possibly due to better delineation of the sclerochoroidal junction on SS-OCT. CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma subjects compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT but not in macular area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6668609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66686092019-08-14 Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) Komma, Swetha Chhablani, Jay Ali, Mohammed Hasnat Garudadri, Chandra S Senthil, Sirisha BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the difference between choroidal thickness (CT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal subjects and to compare the CT measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional observational study included 25 eyes of 17 POAG subjects (cases) and 31 eyes of 20 normal subjects (controls). All the patients underwent complete ophthalmologic examination, enhanced depth imaging, SD-OCT and SS-OCT. In both controls and cases, the CT was measured in seven predetermined points in macular and peripapillary area and were compared. RESULTS: Choroid was significantly thicker on SS-OCT compared with SD-OCT in peripapillary and macular area in both cases and controls, except for inferior peripapillary in controls. The CT was not different from glaucoma and controls in peripapillary or macular area on SD-OCT (p>0.05), however, the CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT (p<0.05) except inferior peripapillary (p=0.13). There was good intraobserver (±20 µm) and interobserver (±55 µm and ±45 µm) agreement on both SD-OCT and SS-OCT respectively. On SD-OCT, choroid was thinnest at the temporal peripapillary and thickest at subfoveal location in controls. In POAG, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary region and thickest (500 µm) nasal to the fovea. On SS-OCT, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary and thickest at the temporal peripapillary area in both cases and controls. CONCLUSION: CT measurements on SS-OCT were higher than the SD-OCT measurements possibly due to better delineation of the sclerochoroidal junction on SS-OCT. CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma subjects compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT but not in macular area. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6668609/ /pubmed/31414052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000258 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Komma, Swetha
Chhablani, Jay
Ali, Mohammed Hasnat
Garudadri, Chandra S
Senthil, Sirisha
Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
title Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
title_full Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
title_fullStr Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
title_short Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
title_sort comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (poag) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (sd-oct) and swept source optical coherence tomography (ss-oct)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000258
work_keys_str_mv AT kommaswetha comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct
AT chhablanijay comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct
AT alimohammedhasnat comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct
AT garudadrichandras comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct
AT senthilsirisha comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct