Cargando…
Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the difference between choroidal thickness (CT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal subjects and to compare the CT measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000258 |
_version_ | 1783440250944618496 |
---|---|
author | Komma, Swetha Chhablani, Jay Ali, Mohammed Hasnat Garudadri, Chandra S Senthil, Sirisha |
author_facet | Komma, Swetha Chhablani, Jay Ali, Mohammed Hasnat Garudadri, Chandra S Senthil, Sirisha |
author_sort | Komma, Swetha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the difference between choroidal thickness (CT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal subjects and to compare the CT measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional observational study included 25 eyes of 17 POAG subjects (cases) and 31 eyes of 20 normal subjects (controls). All the patients underwent complete ophthalmologic examination, enhanced depth imaging, SD-OCT and SS-OCT. In both controls and cases, the CT was measured in seven predetermined points in macular and peripapillary area and were compared. RESULTS: Choroid was significantly thicker on SS-OCT compared with SD-OCT in peripapillary and macular area in both cases and controls, except for inferior peripapillary in controls. The CT was not different from glaucoma and controls in peripapillary or macular area on SD-OCT (p>0.05), however, the CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT (p<0.05) except inferior peripapillary (p=0.13). There was good intraobserver (±20 µm) and interobserver (±55 µm and ±45 µm) agreement on both SD-OCT and SS-OCT respectively. On SD-OCT, choroid was thinnest at the temporal peripapillary and thickest at subfoveal location in controls. In POAG, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary region and thickest (500 µm) nasal to the fovea. On SS-OCT, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary and thickest at the temporal peripapillary area in both cases and controls. CONCLUSION: CT measurements on SS-OCT were higher than the SD-OCT measurements possibly due to better delineation of the sclerochoroidal junction on SS-OCT. CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma subjects compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT but not in macular area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6668609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66686092019-08-14 Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) Komma, Swetha Chhablani, Jay Ali, Mohammed Hasnat Garudadri, Chandra S Senthil, Sirisha BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the difference between choroidal thickness (CT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal subjects and to compare the CT measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional observational study included 25 eyes of 17 POAG subjects (cases) and 31 eyes of 20 normal subjects (controls). All the patients underwent complete ophthalmologic examination, enhanced depth imaging, SD-OCT and SS-OCT. In both controls and cases, the CT was measured in seven predetermined points in macular and peripapillary area and were compared. RESULTS: Choroid was significantly thicker on SS-OCT compared with SD-OCT in peripapillary and macular area in both cases and controls, except for inferior peripapillary in controls. The CT was not different from glaucoma and controls in peripapillary or macular area on SD-OCT (p>0.05), however, the CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT (p<0.05) except inferior peripapillary (p=0.13). There was good intraobserver (±20 µm) and interobserver (±55 µm and ±45 µm) agreement on both SD-OCT and SS-OCT respectively. On SD-OCT, choroid was thinnest at the temporal peripapillary and thickest at subfoveal location in controls. In POAG, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary region and thickest (500 µm) nasal to the fovea. On SS-OCT, choroid was thinnest at inferior peripapillary and thickest at the temporal peripapillary area in both cases and controls. CONCLUSION: CT measurements on SS-OCT were higher than the SD-OCT measurements possibly due to better delineation of the sclerochoroidal junction on SS-OCT. CT was significantly thicker in glaucoma subjects compared with controls in peripapillary area on SS-OCT but not in macular area. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6668609/ /pubmed/31414052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000258 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Komma, Swetha Chhablani, Jay Ali, Mohammed Hasnat Garudadri, Chandra S Senthil, Sirisha Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) |
title | Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) |
title_full | Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) |
title_short | Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) |
title_sort | comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (poag) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (sd-oct) and swept source optical coherence tomography (ss-oct) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kommaswetha comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct AT chhablanijay comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct AT alimohammedhasnat comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct AT garudadrichandras comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct AT senthilsirisha comparisonofperipapillaryandsubfovealchoroidalthicknessinnormalversusprimaryopenangleglaucomapoagsubjectsusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographysdoctandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyssoct |