Cargando…

Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory

Previous work supports an age-specific impairment for recognition memory of pairs of words and other stimuli. The present study tested the generalization of an associative deficit across word, name, and nonword stimulus types in younger and older adults. Participants completed associative and item m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zakrzewski, Alexandria C., Wisniewski, Matthew G., Williams, Helen L., Berry, Jane M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31365587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220526
_version_ 1783440272194011136
author Zakrzewski, Alexandria C.
Wisniewski, Matthew G.
Williams, Helen L.
Berry, Jane M.
author_facet Zakrzewski, Alexandria C.
Wisniewski, Matthew G.
Williams, Helen L.
Berry, Jane M.
author_sort Zakrzewski, Alexandria C.
collection PubMed
description Previous work supports an age-specific impairment for recognition memory of pairs of words and other stimuli. The present study tested the generalization of an associative deficit across word, name, and nonword stimulus types in younger and older adults. Participants completed associative and item memory tests in one of three stimulus conditions and made metacognitive ratings of perceptions of self-efficacy, task success (“postdictions”), strategy success, task effort, difficulty, fatigue, and stamina. Surprisingly, no support was found for an age-related associative deficit on any of the stimulus types. We analyzed our data further using a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network. The network was trained to classify individuals as younger or older and its hidden unit activities were examined to identify data patterns that distinguished younger from older participants. Analysis of hidden unit activities revealed that the network was able to correctly classify by identifying three different clusters of participants, with two qualitatively different groups of older individuals. One cluster of older individuals found the tasks to be relatively easy, they believed they had performed well, and their beliefs were accurate. The other cluster of older individuals found the tasks to be difficult, believed they were performing relatively poorly, yet their beliefs did not map accurately onto their performance. Crucially, data from the associative task were more useful for neural networks to discriminate between younger and older adults than data from the item task. This work underscores the importance of considering both individual and age differences as well as metacognitive responses in the context of associative memory paradigms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6668824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66688242019-08-06 Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory Zakrzewski, Alexandria C. Wisniewski, Matthew G. Williams, Helen L. Berry, Jane M. PLoS One Research Article Previous work supports an age-specific impairment for recognition memory of pairs of words and other stimuli. The present study tested the generalization of an associative deficit across word, name, and nonword stimulus types in younger and older adults. Participants completed associative and item memory tests in one of three stimulus conditions and made metacognitive ratings of perceptions of self-efficacy, task success (“postdictions”), strategy success, task effort, difficulty, fatigue, and stamina. Surprisingly, no support was found for an age-related associative deficit on any of the stimulus types. We analyzed our data further using a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network. The network was trained to classify individuals as younger or older and its hidden unit activities were examined to identify data patterns that distinguished younger from older participants. Analysis of hidden unit activities revealed that the network was able to correctly classify by identifying three different clusters of participants, with two qualitatively different groups of older individuals. One cluster of older individuals found the tasks to be relatively easy, they believed they had performed well, and their beliefs were accurate. The other cluster of older individuals found the tasks to be difficult, believed they were performing relatively poorly, yet their beliefs did not map accurately onto their performance. Crucially, data from the associative task were more useful for neural networks to discriminate between younger and older adults than data from the item task. This work underscores the importance of considering both individual and age differences as well as metacognitive responses in the context of associative memory paradigms. Public Library of Science 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6668824/ /pubmed/31365587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220526 Text en © 2019 Zakrzewski et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zakrzewski, Alexandria C.
Wisniewski, Matthew G.
Williams, Helen L.
Berry, Jane M.
Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory
title Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory
title_full Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory
title_fullStr Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory
title_full_unstemmed Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory
title_short Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory
title_sort artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31365587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220526
work_keys_str_mv AT zakrzewskialexandriac artificialneuralnetworksrevealindividualdifferencesinmetacognitivemonitoringofmemory
AT wisniewskimatthewg artificialneuralnetworksrevealindividualdifferencesinmetacognitivemonitoringofmemory
AT williamshelenl artificialneuralnetworksrevealindividualdifferencesinmetacognitivemonitoringofmemory
AT berryjanem artificialneuralnetworksrevealindividualdifferencesinmetacognitivemonitoringofmemory