Cargando…
Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR
BACKGROUND: Information regarding left ventricular (LV) volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has major diagnostic and prognostic value when assessing patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate the agreement between measurement of LV volumes and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Echocardiography
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e26 |
_version_ | 1783440327265222656 |
---|---|
author | Beitner, Natalie Jenner, Jonas Sörensson, Peder |
author_facet | Beitner, Natalie Jenner, Jonas Sörensson, Peder |
author_sort | Beitner, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Information regarding left ventricular (LV) volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has major diagnostic and prognostic value when assessing patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate the agreement between measurement of LV volumes and LVEF by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients in a stable phase after STEMI. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent examinations by 3DE, SPECT and CMR three months after STEMI. RESULTS: There was a significant bias in end-diastolic volume (EDV) measured by 3DE (–64 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–55 mL, p < 0.001) compared with that measured by CMR. This was also the case for end-systolic volume (ESV) measured by 3DE (–36 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–28 mL, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between 3DE and SPECT for EDV or ESV. However, LVEF did not differ between the three methods. The agreement between all three methods was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.44) for LV volume and good for LVEF (ICC = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: LV volumes assessed by 3DE did not differ from SPECT, and despite larger LV volumes by CMR, measurements of LVEF showed good agreement between all three methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6669182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Echocardiography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66691822019-08-05 Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR Beitner, Natalie Jenner, Jonas Sörensson, Peder J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Information regarding left ventricular (LV) volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has major diagnostic and prognostic value when assessing patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate the agreement between measurement of LV volumes and LVEF by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients in a stable phase after STEMI. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent examinations by 3DE, SPECT and CMR three months after STEMI. RESULTS: There was a significant bias in end-diastolic volume (EDV) measured by 3DE (–64 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–55 mL, p < 0.001) compared with that measured by CMR. This was also the case for end-systolic volume (ESV) measured by 3DE (–36 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–28 mL, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between 3DE and SPECT for EDV or ESV. However, LVEF did not differ between the three methods. The agreement between all three methods was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.44) for LV volume and good for LVEF (ICC = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: LV volumes assessed by 3DE did not differ from SPECT, and despite larger LV volumes by CMR, measurements of LVEF showed good agreement between all three methods. Korean Society of Echocardiography 2019-07 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6669182/ /pubmed/31161750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e26 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Echocardiography https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Beitner, Natalie Jenner, Jonas Sörensson, Peder Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR |
title | Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR |
title_full | Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR |
title_short | Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR |
title_sort | comparison of left ventricular volumes measured by 3de, spect and cmr |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beitnernatalie comparisonofleftventricularvolumesmeasuredby3despectandcmr AT jennerjonas comparisonofleftventricularvolumesmeasuredby3despectandcmr AT sorenssonpeder comparisonofleftventricularvolumesmeasuredby3despectandcmr |