Cargando…

Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR

BACKGROUND: Information regarding left ventricular (LV) volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has major diagnostic and prognostic value when assessing patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate the agreement between measurement of LV volumes and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beitner, Natalie, Jenner, Jonas, Sörensson, Peder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Echocardiography 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e26
_version_ 1783440327265222656
author Beitner, Natalie
Jenner, Jonas
Sörensson, Peder
author_facet Beitner, Natalie
Jenner, Jonas
Sörensson, Peder
author_sort Beitner, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information regarding left ventricular (LV) volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has major diagnostic and prognostic value when assessing patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate the agreement between measurement of LV volumes and LVEF by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients in a stable phase after STEMI. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent examinations by 3DE, SPECT and CMR three months after STEMI. RESULTS: There was a significant bias in end-diastolic volume (EDV) measured by 3DE (–64 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–55 mL, p < 0.001) compared with that measured by CMR. This was also the case for end-systolic volume (ESV) measured by 3DE (–36 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–28 mL, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between 3DE and SPECT for EDV or ESV. However, LVEF did not differ between the three methods. The agreement between all three methods was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.44) for LV volume and good for LVEF (ICC = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: LV volumes assessed by 3DE did not differ from SPECT, and despite larger LV volumes by CMR, measurements of LVEF showed good agreement between all three methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6669182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Echocardiography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66691822019-08-05 Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR Beitner, Natalie Jenner, Jonas Sörensson, Peder J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Information regarding left ventricular (LV) volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has major diagnostic and prognostic value when assessing patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate the agreement between measurement of LV volumes and LVEF by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients in a stable phase after STEMI. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent examinations by 3DE, SPECT and CMR three months after STEMI. RESULTS: There was a significant bias in end-diastolic volume (EDV) measured by 3DE (–64 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–55 mL, p < 0.001) compared with that measured by CMR. This was also the case for end-systolic volume (ESV) measured by 3DE (–36 mL, p < 0.001) and SPECT (–28 mL, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between 3DE and SPECT for EDV or ESV. However, LVEF did not differ between the three methods. The agreement between all three methods was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.44) for LV volume and good for LVEF (ICC = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: LV volumes assessed by 3DE did not differ from SPECT, and despite larger LV volumes by CMR, measurements of LVEF showed good agreement between all three methods. Korean Society of Echocardiography 2019-07 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6669182/ /pubmed/31161750 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e26 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Echocardiography https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Beitner, Natalie
Jenner, Jonas
Sörensson, Peder
Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR
title Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR
title_full Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR
title_fullStr Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR
title_short Comparison of Left Ventricular Volumes Measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR
title_sort comparison of left ventricular volumes measured by 3de, spect and cmr
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161750
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e26
work_keys_str_mv AT beitnernatalie comparisonofleftventricularvolumesmeasuredby3despectandcmr
AT jennerjonas comparisonofleftventricularvolumesmeasuredby3despectandcmr
AT sorenssonpeder comparisonofleftventricularvolumesmeasuredby3despectandcmr