Cargando…
3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence
To compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ceMRA) and 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) during systole and diastole for assessment of the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) in patients considered for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) after tetralogy of Fallot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01578-w |
_version_ | 1783440330817798144 |
---|---|
author | Ebel, Sebastian Gottschling, Sebastian Buzan, Maria T. A. Grothoff, Matthias Dähnert, Ingo Wagner, Robert Gräfe, Daniel Lurz, Philipp Gutberlet, Matthias Lücke, Christian |
author_facet | Ebel, Sebastian Gottschling, Sebastian Buzan, Maria T. A. Grothoff, Matthias Dähnert, Ingo Wagner, Robert Gräfe, Daniel Lurz, Philipp Gutberlet, Matthias Lücke, Christian |
author_sort | Ebel, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ceMRA) and 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) during systole and diastole for assessment of the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) in patients considered for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. We retrospectively evaluated 89 patients (male: 45, mean age 19 ± 8 years), who underwent cardiac-MRI after surgical TOF-repair. Datasets covering the whole heart in systole and diastole were acquired using ECG-gated 3D SSFP and non-gated ceMRA. Measurements were performed in SSFP-sequences and in ceMRA in the narrowest region of the RVOT to obtain the minimum, maximum and effective diameter. Invasive balloon sizing as the gold standard was available in 12 patients. The minimum diameter in diastolic SSFP, systolic SSFP and ceMRA were 21.4 mm (± 6.1 mm), 22.6 mm (± 6.2 mm) and 22.6 mm (± 6.0 mm), respectively. Maximum diameter was 29.9 mm (± 9.5 mm), 30.0 mm (± 7.0 mm) and 28.8 mm (± 8.1 mm) respectively. The effective diameter was 23.2 mm (± 5.7 mm), 27.4 mm (± 6.7 mm) and 24.4 mm (± 6.2 mm), differing significantly between diastole and systole (p < 0.0001). Measurements in ECG-gated SSFP showed a better inter- and intraobserver variability compared to measurements in non-ECG-gated ceMRA. Comparing invasive balloon sizing with our analysis, we found the highest correlation coefficients for the maximum and effective diameter measured in systolic SSFP (R = 0.99 respectively). ECG-gated 3D SSFP enables the identification and characterization of a potential landing zone for PPVI. The maximum and effective systolic diameter allow precise sizing for PPVI. Patients with TOF-repair could benefit from cardiac MRI before PPVI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6669200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66692002019-08-14 3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence Ebel, Sebastian Gottschling, Sebastian Buzan, Maria T. A. Grothoff, Matthias Dähnert, Ingo Wagner, Robert Gräfe, Daniel Lurz, Philipp Gutberlet, Matthias Lücke, Christian Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper To compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ceMRA) and 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) during systole and diastole for assessment of the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) in patients considered for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. We retrospectively evaluated 89 patients (male: 45, mean age 19 ± 8 years), who underwent cardiac-MRI after surgical TOF-repair. Datasets covering the whole heart in systole and diastole were acquired using ECG-gated 3D SSFP and non-gated ceMRA. Measurements were performed in SSFP-sequences and in ceMRA in the narrowest region of the RVOT to obtain the minimum, maximum and effective diameter. Invasive balloon sizing as the gold standard was available in 12 patients. The minimum diameter in diastolic SSFP, systolic SSFP and ceMRA were 21.4 mm (± 6.1 mm), 22.6 mm (± 6.2 mm) and 22.6 mm (± 6.0 mm), respectively. Maximum diameter was 29.9 mm (± 9.5 mm), 30.0 mm (± 7.0 mm) and 28.8 mm (± 8.1 mm) respectively. The effective diameter was 23.2 mm (± 5.7 mm), 27.4 mm (± 6.7 mm) and 24.4 mm (± 6.2 mm), differing significantly between diastole and systole (p < 0.0001). Measurements in ECG-gated SSFP showed a better inter- and intraobserver variability compared to measurements in non-ECG-gated ceMRA. Comparing invasive balloon sizing with our analysis, we found the highest correlation coefficients for the maximum and effective diameter measured in systolic SSFP (R = 0.99 respectively). ECG-gated 3D SSFP enables the identification and characterization of a potential landing zone for PPVI. The maximum and effective systolic diameter allow precise sizing for PPVI. Patients with TOF-repair could benefit from cardiac MRI before PPVI. Springer Netherlands 2019-04-01 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6669200/ /pubmed/30937683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01578-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Ebel, Sebastian Gottschling, Sebastian Buzan, Maria T. A. Grothoff, Matthias Dähnert, Ingo Wagner, Robert Gräfe, Daniel Lurz, Philipp Gutberlet, Matthias Lücke, Christian 3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence |
title | 3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence |
title_full | 3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence |
title_fullStr | 3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence |
title_short | 3D-assessment of RVOT dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3D steady-state free precession sequence |
title_sort | 3d-assessment of rvot dimensions prior percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus 3d steady-state free precession sequence |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01578-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebelsebastian 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT gottschlingsebastian 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT buzanmariata 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT grothoffmatthias 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT dahnertingo 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT wagnerrobert 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT grafedaniel 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT lurzphilipp 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT gutberletmatthias 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence AT luckechristian 3dassessmentofrvotdimensionspriorpercutaneouspulmonaryvalveimplantationcomparisonofcontrastenhancedmagneticresonanceangiographyversus3dsteadystatefreeprecessionsequence |