Cargando…
Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions
We developed a digitally enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury (AKI) management incorporating a mobile detection application, specialist clinical response team and care protocol. Clinical outcome data were collected from adults with AKI on emergency admission before (May 2016 to January 2017)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0100-6 |
_version_ | 1783440335772319744 |
---|---|
author | Connell, Alistair Montgomery, Hugh Martin, Peter Nightingale, Claire Sadeghi-Alavijeh, Omid King, Dominic Karthikesalingam, Alan Hughes, Cian Back, Trevor Ayoub, Kareem Suleyman, Mustafa Jones, Gareth Cross, Jennifer Stanley, Sarah Emerson, Mary Merrick, Charles Rees, Geraint Laing, Chris Raine, Rosalind |
author_facet | Connell, Alistair Montgomery, Hugh Martin, Peter Nightingale, Claire Sadeghi-Alavijeh, Omid King, Dominic Karthikesalingam, Alan Hughes, Cian Back, Trevor Ayoub, Kareem Suleyman, Mustafa Jones, Gareth Cross, Jennifer Stanley, Sarah Emerson, Mary Merrick, Charles Rees, Geraint Laing, Chris Raine, Rosalind |
author_sort | Connell, Alistair |
collection | PubMed |
description | We developed a digitally enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury (AKI) management incorporating a mobile detection application, specialist clinical response team and care protocol. Clinical outcome data were collected from adults with AKI on emergency admission before (May 2016 to January 2017) and after (May to September 2017) deployment at the intervention site and another not receiving the intervention. Changes in primary outcome (serum creatinine recovery to ≤120% baseline at hospital discharge) and secondary outcomes (30-day survival, renal replacement therapy, renal or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, worsening AKI stage and length of stay) were measured using interrupted time-series regression. Processes of care data (time to AKI recognition, time to treatment) were extracted from casenotes, and compared over two 9-month periods before and after implementation (January to September 2016 and 2017, respectively) using pre–post analysis. There was no step change in renal recovery or any of the secondary outcomes. Trends for creatinine recovery rates (estimated odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.00–1.08, p = 0.038) and renal or ICU admission (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90–1.00, p = 0.044) improved significantly at the intervention site. However, difference-in-difference analyses between sites for creatinine recovery (estimated OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90–1.00, p = 0.053) and renal or ICU admission (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98–1.16, p = 0.140) were not significant. Among process measures, time to AKI recognition and treatment of nephrotoxicity improved significantly (p < 0.001 and 0.047 respectively). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6669220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66692202019-08-08 Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions Connell, Alistair Montgomery, Hugh Martin, Peter Nightingale, Claire Sadeghi-Alavijeh, Omid King, Dominic Karthikesalingam, Alan Hughes, Cian Back, Trevor Ayoub, Kareem Suleyman, Mustafa Jones, Gareth Cross, Jennifer Stanley, Sarah Emerson, Mary Merrick, Charles Rees, Geraint Laing, Chris Raine, Rosalind NPJ Digit Med Article We developed a digitally enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury (AKI) management incorporating a mobile detection application, specialist clinical response team and care protocol. Clinical outcome data were collected from adults with AKI on emergency admission before (May 2016 to January 2017) and after (May to September 2017) deployment at the intervention site and another not receiving the intervention. Changes in primary outcome (serum creatinine recovery to ≤120% baseline at hospital discharge) and secondary outcomes (30-day survival, renal replacement therapy, renal or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, worsening AKI stage and length of stay) were measured using interrupted time-series regression. Processes of care data (time to AKI recognition, time to treatment) were extracted from casenotes, and compared over two 9-month periods before and after implementation (January to September 2016 and 2017, respectively) using pre–post analysis. There was no step change in renal recovery or any of the secondary outcomes. Trends for creatinine recovery rates (estimated odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.00–1.08, p = 0.038) and renal or ICU admission (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90–1.00, p = 0.044) improved significantly at the intervention site. However, difference-in-difference analyses between sites for creatinine recovery (estimated OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90–1.00, p = 0.053) and renal or ICU admission (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98–1.16, p = 0.140) were not significant. Among process measures, time to AKI recognition and treatment of nephrotoxicity improved significantly (p < 0.001 and 0.047 respectively). Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6669220/ /pubmed/31396561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0100-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Connell, Alistair Montgomery, Hugh Martin, Peter Nightingale, Claire Sadeghi-Alavijeh, Omid King, Dominic Karthikesalingam, Alan Hughes, Cian Back, Trevor Ayoub, Kareem Suleyman, Mustafa Jones, Gareth Cross, Jennifer Stanley, Sarah Emerson, Mary Merrick, Charles Rees, Geraint Laing, Chris Raine, Rosalind Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions |
title | Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions |
title_full | Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions |
title_short | Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions |
title_sort | evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0100-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT connellalistair evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT montgomeryhugh evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT martinpeter evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT nightingaleclaire evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT sadeghialavijehomid evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT kingdominic evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT karthikesalingamalan evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT hughescian evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT backtrevor evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT ayoubkareem evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT suleymanmustafa evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT jonesgareth evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT crossjennifer evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT stanleysarah evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT emersonmary evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT merrickcharles evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT reesgeraint evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT laingchris evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions AT rainerosalind evaluationofadigitallyenabledcarepathwayforacutekidneyinjurymanagementinhospitalemergencyadmissions |