Cargando…
Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users
This study compared spatial speech-in-noise performance in two cochlear implant (CI) patient groups: bimodal listeners, who use a hearing aid contralaterally to support their impaired acoustic hearing, and listeners with contralateral normal hearing, i.e., who were single-sided deaf before implantat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31364496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519858311 |
_version_ | 1783440461586759680 |
---|---|
author | Williges, Ben Wesarg, Thomas Jung, Lorenz Geven, Leontien I. Radeloff, Andreas Jürgens, Tim |
author_facet | Williges, Ben Wesarg, Thomas Jung, Lorenz Geven, Leontien I. Radeloff, Andreas Jürgens, Tim |
author_sort | Williges, Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared spatial speech-in-noise performance in two cochlear implant (CI) patient groups: bimodal listeners, who use a hearing aid contralaterally to support their impaired acoustic hearing, and listeners with contralateral normal hearing, i.e., who were single-sided deaf before implantation. Using a laboratory setting that controls for head movements and that simulates spatial acoustic scenes, speech reception thresholds were measured for frontal speech-in-stationary noise from the front, the left, or the right side. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was then extracted from speech reception thresholds for monaural and binaural listening. SRM was found to be significantly lower in bimodal CI than in CI single-sided deaf listeners. Within each listener group, the SRM extracted from monaural listening did not differ from the SRM extracted from binaural listening. In contrast, a normal-hearing control group showed a significant improvement in SRM when using two ears in comparison to one. Neither CI group showed a binaural summation effect; that is, their performance was not improved by using two devices instead of the best monaural device in each spatial scenario. The results confirm a “listening with the better ear” strategy in the two CI patient groups, where patients benefited from using two ears/devices instead of one by selectively attending to the better one. Which one is the better ear, however, depends on the spatial scenario and on the individual configuration of hearing loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6669847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66698472019-08-07 Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users Williges, Ben Wesarg, Thomas Jung, Lorenz Geven, Leontien I. Radeloff, Andreas Jürgens, Tim Trends Hear Original Article This study compared spatial speech-in-noise performance in two cochlear implant (CI) patient groups: bimodal listeners, who use a hearing aid contralaterally to support their impaired acoustic hearing, and listeners with contralateral normal hearing, i.e., who were single-sided deaf before implantation. Using a laboratory setting that controls for head movements and that simulates spatial acoustic scenes, speech reception thresholds were measured for frontal speech-in-stationary noise from the front, the left, or the right side. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was then extracted from speech reception thresholds for monaural and binaural listening. SRM was found to be significantly lower in bimodal CI than in CI single-sided deaf listeners. Within each listener group, the SRM extracted from monaural listening did not differ from the SRM extracted from binaural listening. In contrast, a normal-hearing control group showed a significant improvement in SRM when using two ears in comparison to one. Neither CI group showed a binaural summation effect; that is, their performance was not improved by using two devices instead of the best monaural device in each spatial scenario. The results confirm a “listening with the better ear” strategy in the two CI patient groups, where patients benefited from using two ears/devices instead of one by selectively attending to the better one. Which one is the better ear, however, depends on the spatial scenario and on the individual configuration of hearing loss. SAGE Publications 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6669847/ /pubmed/31364496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519858311 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Williges, Ben Wesarg, Thomas Jung, Lorenz Geven, Leontien I. Radeloff, Andreas Jürgens, Tim Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users |
title | Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full | Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users |
title_fullStr | Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users |
title_short | Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users |
title_sort | spatial speech-in-noise performance in bimodal and single-sided deaf cochlear implant users |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6669847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31364496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519858311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willigesben spatialspeechinnoiseperformanceinbimodalandsinglesideddeafcochlearimplantusers AT wesargthomas spatialspeechinnoiseperformanceinbimodalandsinglesideddeafcochlearimplantusers AT junglorenz spatialspeechinnoiseperformanceinbimodalandsinglesideddeafcochlearimplantusers AT gevenleontieni spatialspeechinnoiseperformanceinbimodalandsinglesideddeafcochlearimplantusers AT radeloffandreas spatialspeechinnoiseperformanceinbimodalandsinglesideddeafcochlearimplantusers AT jurgenstim spatialspeechinnoiseperformanceinbimodalandsinglesideddeafcochlearimplantusers |