Cargando…
Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry
PURPOSE: In eye movement perimetry (EMP), the extent of the visual field is tested by assessing the saccades using an eye tracker. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of age and sex of the subjects, the eccentricity and intensity of the peripheral stimuli on saccadic reaction t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6670042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.4.13 |
_version_ | 1783440493052428288 |
---|---|
author | Mazumdar, Deepmala Meethal, Najiya S. Kadavath Panday, Manish Asokan, Rashima Thepass, Gijs George, Ronnie J. van der Steen, Johannes Pel, Johan J. M. |
author_facet | Mazumdar, Deepmala Meethal, Najiya S. Kadavath Panday, Manish Asokan, Rashima Thepass, Gijs George, Ronnie J. van der Steen, Johannes Pel, Johan J. M. |
author_sort | Mazumdar, Deepmala |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In eye movement perimetry (EMP), the extent of the visual field is tested by assessing the saccades using an eye tracker. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of age and sex of the subjects, the eccentricity and intensity of the peripheral stimuli on saccadic reaction time (SRT), and the interaction between these parameters in healthy participants. METHODS: Healthy participants aged between 20 to 70 years underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and an EMP test. SRT was determined from detected peripheral stimuli of four intensity levels. A multilevel mixed-model analysis was used to verify the influence of subject and stimulus characteristics on SRT within the tested visual field. RESULTS: Ninety-five subjects (mean age 43.0 [15.0] years) were included. Age, stimulus intensity, and eccentricity had a statistically significant effect on SRT, not sex. SRTs were significantly faster with increasing stimulus intensity and decreasing eccentricity (P < 0.001). At the lowest stimulus intensity of 192 cd/m(2), a significant interaction was found between age and eccentricity. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated significant SRT dependence across the visual field measured up to 27°, irrespective of sex. The presented SRT values may serve as a first normative guide for EMP. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This report of SRT interaction can aid in refining its use as a measure of visual field responsiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6670042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66700422019-08-06 Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry Mazumdar, Deepmala Meethal, Najiya S. Kadavath Panday, Manish Asokan, Rashima Thepass, Gijs George, Ronnie J. van der Steen, Johannes Pel, Johan J. M. Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: In eye movement perimetry (EMP), the extent of the visual field is tested by assessing the saccades using an eye tracker. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of age and sex of the subjects, the eccentricity and intensity of the peripheral stimuli on saccadic reaction time (SRT), and the interaction between these parameters in healthy participants. METHODS: Healthy participants aged between 20 to 70 years underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and an EMP test. SRT was determined from detected peripheral stimuli of four intensity levels. A multilevel mixed-model analysis was used to verify the influence of subject and stimulus characteristics on SRT within the tested visual field. RESULTS: Ninety-five subjects (mean age 43.0 [15.0] years) were included. Age, stimulus intensity, and eccentricity had a statistically significant effect on SRT, not sex. SRTs were significantly faster with increasing stimulus intensity and decreasing eccentricity (P < 0.001). At the lowest stimulus intensity of 192 cd/m(2), a significant interaction was found between age and eccentricity. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated significant SRT dependence across the visual field measured up to 27°, irrespective of sex. The presented SRT values may serve as a first normative guide for EMP. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This report of SRT interaction can aid in refining its use as a measure of visual field responsiveness. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6670042/ /pubmed/31388465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.4.13 Text en Copyright 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Mazumdar, Deepmala Meethal, Najiya S. Kadavath Panday, Manish Asokan, Rashima Thepass, Gijs George, Ronnie J. van der Steen, Johannes Pel, Johan J. M. Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry |
title | Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry |
title_full | Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry |
title_fullStr | Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry |
title_short | Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry |
title_sort | effect of age, sex, stimulus intensity, and eccentricity on saccadic reaction time in eye movement perimetry |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6670042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.4.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazumdardeepmala effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry AT meethalnajiyaskadavath effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry AT pandaymanish effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry AT asokanrashima effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry AT thepassgijs effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry AT georgeronniej effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry AT vandersteenjohannes effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry AT peljohanjm effectofagesexstimulusintensityandeccentricityonsaccadicreactiontimeineyemovementperimetry |