Cargando…

Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives

BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) are gaining more and more importance in the context of clinical trials. The assessment of PRO is frequently performed by questionnaires where the multiple items of a questionnaire are usually pooled within summarizing scores. These scores are used as varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feißt, Manuel, Hennigs, André, Heil, Jörg, Moosbrugger, Helfried, Kelava, Augustin, Stolpner, Ilona, Kieser, Meinhard, Rauch, Geraldine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6670170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0806-9
_version_ 1783440508621684736
author Feißt, Manuel
Hennigs, André
Heil, Jörg
Moosbrugger, Helfried
Kelava, Augustin
Stolpner, Ilona
Kieser, Meinhard
Rauch, Geraldine
author_facet Feißt, Manuel
Hennigs, André
Heil, Jörg
Moosbrugger, Helfried
Kelava, Augustin
Stolpner, Ilona
Kieser, Meinhard
Rauch, Geraldine
author_sort Feißt, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) are gaining more and more importance in the context of clinical trials. The assessment of PRO is frequently performed by questionnaires where the multiple items of a questionnaire are usually pooled within summarizing scores. These scores are used as variables to measure subjective aspects of treatments and diseases. In clinical research, the calculation of these scores is mostly kept very simple, e.g. by a simple summation of item values. In the medical literature, there is hardly any guidance for performing a refinements of questionnaires and for deducing adequate scores. In contrast, in psychometric literature, there are plenty of more sophisticated methods, which overcome typical assumptions made in traditional (sum) scores, however to the prize of more complicated algorithms, which might be difficult to communicate. When faced with the practical task to refine an existing questionnaire, there exist a clear gap of guidance for applied medical researchers. By this article we try to fill this important gap between psychometric theory and medical application by illustrating our methodological choices on the example of a clinical PRO questionnaire. METHODS: Based on our experiences with the refinement of the BCTOS, a PRO questionnaire to assess aesthetic and function after breast conserving therapy in breast cancer patients, we present the following general steps that we performed by refining the BCTOS questionnaire and its scores: 1. Refinement of the length of the questionnaire and the (item-factor) structure. 2. Selection of the factor score estimation method. 3. Validation of the refined questionnaire and scores with respect to validity, reliability and structure based on a validation cohort. RESULTS: Our step-step-step procedure helped us to shorten the current form of the BCTOS and to redefine the factor structure. By this, the compliance of patients can be increased and the interpretation of the results becomes more coherent. CONCLUSIONS: We present a step-by-step procedure to refine an existing medical questionnaire along with its scores illustrated and discussed by the refinement of the BCTOS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Due to the character of the study (no intervention study), no registration was performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6670170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66701702019-08-06 Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives Feißt, Manuel Hennigs, André Heil, Jörg Moosbrugger, Helfried Kelava, Augustin Stolpner, Ilona Kieser, Meinhard Rauch, Geraldine BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) are gaining more and more importance in the context of clinical trials. The assessment of PRO is frequently performed by questionnaires where the multiple items of a questionnaire are usually pooled within summarizing scores. These scores are used as variables to measure subjective aspects of treatments and diseases. In clinical research, the calculation of these scores is mostly kept very simple, e.g. by a simple summation of item values. In the medical literature, there is hardly any guidance for performing a refinements of questionnaires and for deducing adequate scores. In contrast, in psychometric literature, there are plenty of more sophisticated methods, which overcome typical assumptions made in traditional (sum) scores, however to the prize of more complicated algorithms, which might be difficult to communicate. When faced with the practical task to refine an existing questionnaire, there exist a clear gap of guidance for applied medical researchers. By this article we try to fill this important gap between psychometric theory and medical application by illustrating our methodological choices on the example of a clinical PRO questionnaire. METHODS: Based on our experiences with the refinement of the BCTOS, a PRO questionnaire to assess aesthetic and function after breast conserving therapy in breast cancer patients, we present the following general steps that we performed by refining the BCTOS questionnaire and its scores: 1. Refinement of the length of the questionnaire and the (item-factor) structure. 2. Selection of the factor score estimation method. 3. Validation of the refined questionnaire and scores with respect to validity, reliability and structure based on a validation cohort. RESULTS: Our step-step-step procedure helped us to shorten the current form of the BCTOS and to redefine the factor structure. By this, the compliance of patients can be increased and the interpretation of the results becomes more coherent. CONCLUSIONS: We present a step-by-step procedure to refine an existing medical questionnaire along with its scores illustrated and discussed by the refinement of the BCTOS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Due to the character of the study (no intervention study), no registration was performed. BioMed Central 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6670170/ /pubmed/31366326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0806-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feißt, Manuel
Hennigs, André
Heil, Jörg
Moosbrugger, Helfried
Kelava, Augustin
Stolpner, Ilona
Kieser, Meinhard
Rauch, Geraldine
Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives
title Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives
title_full Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives
title_fullStr Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives
title_short Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives
title_sort refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6670170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0806-9
work_keys_str_mv AT feißtmanuel refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives
AT hennigsandre refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives
AT heiljorg refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives
AT moosbruggerhelfried refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives
AT kelavaaugustin refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives
AT stolpnerilona refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives
AT kiesermeinhard refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives
AT rauchgeraldine refiningscoresbasedonpatientreportedoutcomesstatisticalandmedicalperspectives