Cargando…

The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC

The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between land use/cover change and cultivated land ecological security in flatland and mountainous areas. Firstly, the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of land use/cover change are described in conjunction with ArcGIS10.5 software base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Li, Xie, Binggeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6675101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31369632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220747
_version_ 1783440617147203584
author Wu, Li
Xie, Binggeng
author_facet Wu, Li
Xie, Binggeng
author_sort Wu, Li
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between land use/cover change and cultivated land ecological security in flatland and mountainous areas. Firstly, the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of land use/cover change are described in conjunction with ArcGIS10.5 software based on remote sensing images of 2005 and 2015. Then, by establishing a pressure-support framework as an assessment indicator system and developing an improved BP neural network model via a genetic algorithm with the help of MATLAB2016a, the spatiotemporal dynamic changes of cultivated land ecological security in Yuxi City from 2005 to 2015 are evaluated. The results showed that the transformation of farmland area accounted for a large proportion of increased constructive land and land use/cover spatial variations were significantly different among counties, which manifested the changes in farmland and the construction land in flatland areas but also facilitated a mutual transformation of forest and grass in mountainous areas. Moreover, ecological security status presented a clear difference among counties due to their different land use/cover changes. The ecological security state of the flatland expressed a higher ecological pressure and lower ecological support, so the security grade was IV. Otherwise, the ecological security was superior and the security grade was level II or I in the mountainous areas. Thus, protection strategies for ecological security should be differentiated in the flatland areas and mountainous areas due to their different ecological security status brought by land use/cover change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6675101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66751012019-08-06 The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC Wu, Li Xie, Binggeng PLoS One Research Article The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between land use/cover change and cultivated land ecological security in flatland and mountainous areas. Firstly, the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of land use/cover change are described in conjunction with ArcGIS10.5 software based on remote sensing images of 2005 and 2015. Then, by establishing a pressure-support framework as an assessment indicator system and developing an improved BP neural network model via a genetic algorithm with the help of MATLAB2016a, the spatiotemporal dynamic changes of cultivated land ecological security in Yuxi City from 2005 to 2015 are evaluated. The results showed that the transformation of farmland area accounted for a large proportion of increased constructive land and land use/cover spatial variations were significantly different among counties, which manifested the changes in farmland and the construction land in flatland areas but also facilitated a mutual transformation of forest and grass in mountainous areas. Moreover, ecological security status presented a clear difference among counties due to their different land use/cover changes. The ecological security state of the flatland expressed a higher ecological pressure and lower ecological support, so the security grade was IV. Otherwise, the ecological security was superior and the security grade was level II or I in the mountainous areas. Thus, protection strategies for ecological security should be differentiated in the flatland areas and mountainous areas due to their different ecological security status brought by land use/cover change. Public Library of Science 2019-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6675101/ /pubmed/31369632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220747 Text en © 2019 Wu, Xie http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Li
Xie, Binggeng
The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC
title The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC
title_full The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC
title_fullStr The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC
title_full_unstemmed The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC
title_short The variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on LUCC
title_sort variation differences of cultivated land ecological security between flatland and mountainous areas based on lucc
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6675101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31369632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220747
work_keys_str_mv AT wuli thevariationdifferencesofcultivatedlandecologicalsecuritybetweenflatlandandmountainousareasbasedonlucc
AT xiebinggeng thevariationdifferencesofcultivatedlandecologicalsecuritybetweenflatlandandmountainousareasbasedonlucc
AT wuli variationdifferencesofcultivatedlandecologicalsecuritybetweenflatlandandmountainousareasbasedonlucc
AT xiebinggeng variationdifferencesofcultivatedlandecologicalsecuritybetweenflatlandandmountainousareasbasedonlucc