Cargando…

Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma

The t(11;14)/CCND1‐IGH, t(4;14)/NSD2(MMSET)‐IGH, and t(14;16)/IGH‐MAF gene rearrangements detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used for risk stratification in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Compared with conventional FISH techniques using fresh cells, immunohistochemistry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murase, Takayuki, Ri, Masaki, Narita, Tomoko, Fujii, Keiichiro, Masaki, Ayako, Iida, Shinsuke, Inagaki, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14109
_version_ 1783440720717152256
author Murase, Takayuki
Ri, Masaki
Narita, Tomoko
Fujii, Keiichiro
Masaki, Ayako
Iida, Shinsuke
Inagaki, Hiroshi
author_facet Murase, Takayuki
Ri, Masaki
Narita, Tomoko
Fujii, Keiichiro
Masaki, Ayako
Iida, Shinsuke
Inagaki, Hiroshi
author_sort Murase, Takayuki
collection PubMed
description The t(11;14)/CCND1‐IGH, t(4;14)/NSD2(MMSET)‐IGH, and t(14;16)/IGH‐MAF gene rearrangements detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used for risk stratification in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Compared with conventional FISH techniques using fresh cells, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is much more cost‐ and time‐efficient, and can be readily applied to routinely prepared formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) materials. In this study, we performed tissue FISH and IHC employing FFPE specimens, and examined the usefulness of IHC as a tool for detecting CCND1,NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements. CD138 signals were used to identify plasma cells in tissue FISH and IHC analyses. With cohort 1 (n = 70), we performed tissue FISH and subsequently IHC, and determined IHC cut‐off points. In this cohort, the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.90 and ≥.96, respectively. With cohort 2, using MM cases with an unknown gene status (n = 120), we performed IHC, and the gene status was estimated using the cut‐off points determined with cohort 1. The subsequent FISH analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.92 and ≥.98, respectively. CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements were estimated accurately by IHC, suggesting that conventional FISH assays can be replaced by IHC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6676137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66761372019-08-06 Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma Murase, Takayuki Ri, Masaki Narita, Tomoko Fujii, Keiichiro Masaki, Ayako Iida, Shinsuke Inagaki, Hiroshi Cancer Sci Original Articles The t(11;14)/CCND1‐IGH, t(4;14)/NSD2(MMSET)‐IGH, and t(14;16)/IGH‐MAF gene rearrangements detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used for risk stratification in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Compared with conventional FISH techniques using fresh cells, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is much more cost‐ and time‐efficient, and can be readily applied to routinely prepared formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) materials. In this study, we performed tissue FISH and IHC employing FFPE specimens, and examined the usefulness of IHC as a tool for detecting CCND1,NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements. CD138 signals were used to identify plasma cells in tissue FISH and IHC analyses. With cohort 1 (n = 70), we performed tissue FISH and subsequently IHC, and determined IHC cut‐off points. In this cohort, the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.90 and ≥.96, respectively. With cohort 2, using MM cases with an unknown gene status (n = 120), we performed IHC, and the gene status was estimated using the cut‐off points determined with cohort 1. The subsequent FISH analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.92 and ≥.98, respectively. CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements were estimated accurately by IHC, suggesting that conventional FISH assays can be replaced by IHC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-11 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6676137/ /pubmed/31218784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14109 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Murase, Takayuki
Ri, Masaki
Narita, Tomoko
Fujii, Keiichiro
Masaki, Ayako
Iida, Shinsuke
Inagaki, Hiroshi
Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
title Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
title_full Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
title_fullStr Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
title_short Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
title_sort immunohistochemistry for identification of ccnd1, nsd2, and maf gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14109
work_keys_str_mv AT murasetakayuki immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma
AT rimasaki immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma
AT naritatomoko immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma
AT fujiikeiichiro immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma
AT masakiayako immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma
AT iidashinsuke immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma
AT inagakihiroshi immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma