Cargando…
Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma
The t(11;14)/CCND1‐IGH, t(4;14)/NSD2(MMSET)‐IGH, and t(14;16)/IGH‐MAF gene rearrangements detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used for risk stratification in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Compared with conventional FISH techniques using fresh cells, immunohistochemistry...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14109 |
_version_ | 1783440720717152256 |
---|---|
author | Murase, Takayuki Ri, Masaki Narita, Tomoko Fujii, Keiichiro Masaki, Ayako Iida, Shinsuke Inagaki, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Murase, Takayuki Ri, Masaki Narita, Tomoko Fujii, Keiichiro Masaki, Ayako Iida, Shinsuke Inagaki, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Murase, Takayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | The t(11;14)/CCND1‐IGH, t(4;14)/NSD2(MMSET)‐IGH, and t(14;16)/IGH‐MAF gene rearrangements detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used for risk stratification in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Compared with conventional FISH techniques using fresh cells, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is much more cost‐ and time‐efficient, and can be readily applied to routinely prepared formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) materials. In this study, we performed tissue FISH and IHC employing FFPE specimens, and examined the usefulness of IHC as a tool for detecting CCND1,NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements. CD138 signals were used to identify plasma cells in tissue FISH and IHC analyses. With cohort 1 (n = 70), we performed tissue FISH and subsequently IHC, and determined IHC cut‐off points. In this cohort, the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.90 and ≥.96, respectively. With cohort 2, using MM cases with an unknown gene status (n = 120), we performed IHC, and the gene status was estimated using the cut‐off points determined with cohort 1. The subsequent FISH analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.92 and ≥.98, respectively. CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements were estimated accurately by IHC, suggesting that conventional FISH assays can be replaced by IHC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6676137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66761372019-08-06 Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma Murase, Takayuki Ri, Masaki Narita, Tomoko Fujii, Keiichiro Masaki, Ayako Iida, Shinsuke Inagaki, Hiroshi Cancer Sci Original Articles The t(11;14)/CCND1‐IGH, t(4;14)/NSD2(MMSET)‐IGH, and t(14;16)/IGH‐MAF gene rearrangements detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used for risk stratification in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Compared with conventional FISH techniques using fresh cells, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is much more cost‐ and time‐efficient, and can be readily applied to routinely prepared formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) materials. In this study, we performed tissue FISH and IHC employing FFPE specimens, and examined the usefulness of IHC as a tool for detecting CCND1,NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements. CD138 signals were used to identify plasma cells in tissue FISH and IHC analyses. With cohort 1 (n = 70), we performed tissue FISH and subsequently IHC, and determined IHC cut‐off points. In this cohort, the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.90 and ≥.96, respectively. With cohort 2, using MM cases with an unknown gene status (n = 120), we performed IHC, and the gene status was estimated using the cut‐off points determined with cohort 1. The subsequent FISH analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity for the 3 molecules were ≥.92 and ≥.98, respectively. CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements were estimated accurately by IHC, suggesting that conventional FISH assays can be replaced by IHC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-11 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6676137/ /pubmed/31218784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14109 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Murase, Takayuki Ri, Masaki Narita, Tomoko Fujii, Keiichiro Masaki, Ayako Iida, Shinsuke Inagaki, Hiroshi Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma |
title | Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma |
title_full | Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma |
title_fullStr | Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma |
title_short | Immunohistochemistry for identification of CCND1, NSD2, and MAF gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma |
title_sort | immunohistochemistry for identification of ccnd1, nsd2, and maf gene rearrangements in plasma cell myeloma |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31218784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.14109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murasetakayuki immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma AT rimasaki immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma AT naritatomoko immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma AT fujiikeiichiro immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma AT masakiayako immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma AT iidashinsuke immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma AT inagakihiroshi immunohistochemistryforidentificationofccnd1nsd2andmafgenerearrangementsinplasmacellmyeloma |