Cargando…

Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Subendometrial and Uterine artery resistance and pulsatility index continuous analysis as a predictor of Endometrial receptivity in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Cycles. DESIGN: Serial 2D transvaginal coloured power doppler ultrasound performed in women on ART cycle t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva Martins, R., Helio Oliani, A., Vaz Oliani, D., Martinez de Oliveira, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0507-6
_version_ 1783440776007516160
author Silva Martins, R.
Helio Oliani, A.
Vaz Oliani, D.
Martinez de Oliveira, J.
author_facet Silva Martins, R.
Helio Oliani, A.
Vaz Oliani, D.
Martinez de Oliveira, J.
author_sort Silva Martins, R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Subendometrial and Uterine artery resistance and pulsatility index continuous analysis as a predictor of Endometrial receptivity in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Cycles. DESIGN: Serial 2D transvaginal coloured power doppler ultrasound performed in women on ART cycle to evaluate a pattern that better predicts implantation rates. One hundred sixty-nine subjects on a prospective case control study were assessed. Uterine artery and Subendometrial resistance and pulsatility index was performed to all subjects at baseline (prior to ovarian controlled stimulation), at day 6, 8 and 10 of controlled ovarian stimulation, at trigger day and at embryo transfer day. Also the ratio of fluxometric parameters between Subendometrial blood flow and uterine artery was measured. RESULTS: No statistical difference was noted between two groups in terms of demographics and ART procedures and scores. Uterine artery resistance and pulsatility index showed statistical difference between the two groups (implantation versus non-implantation group). Also statistical significance was obtained between two groups in terms of Subendometrial vascularization. Ratio between Subendometrial and Uterine artery showed lower values of fluxometric parameters in all range for the Subendometrial territory. CONCLUSIONS: Serial Subendometrial and Uterine artery fluxometry may be a useful tool for clinicians in predicting endometrial receptivity enhancing elective embryo transfers in the same ART cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6676512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66765122019-08-06 Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles Silva Martins, R. Helio Oliani, A. Vaz Oliani, D. Martinez de Oliveira, J. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Subendometrial and Uterine artery resistance and pulsatility index continuous analysis as a predictor of Endometrial receptivity in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Cycles. DESIGN: Serial 2D transvaginal coloured power doppler ultrasound performed in women on ART cycle to evaluate a pattern that better predicts implantation rates. One hundred sixty-nine subjects on a prospective case control study were assessed. Uterine artery and Subendometrial resistance and pulsatility index was performed to all subjects at baseline (prior to ovarian controlled stimulation), at day 6, 8 and 10 of controlled ovarian stimulation, at trigger day and at embryo transfer day. Also the ratio of fluxometric parameters between Subendometrial blood flow and uterine artery was measured. RESULTS: No statistical difference was noted between two groups in terms of demographics and ART procedures and scores. Uterine artery resistance and pulsatility index showed statistical difference between the two groups (implantation versus non-implantation group). Also statistical significance was obtained between two groups in terms of Subendometrial vascularization. Ratio between Subendometrial and Uterine artery showed lower values of fluxometric parameters in all range for the Subendometrial territory. CONCLUSIONS: Serial Subendometrial and Uterine artery fluxometry may be a useful tool for clinicians in predicting endometrial receptivity enhancing elective embryo transfers in the same ART cycle. BioMed Central 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6676512/ /pubmed/31375113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0507-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Silva Martins, R.
Helio Oliani, A.
Vaz Oliani, D.
Martinez de Oliveira, J.
Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles
title Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles
title_full Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles
title_fullStr Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles
title_full_unstemmed Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles
title_short Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles
title_sort subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0507-6
work_keys_str_mv AT silvamartinsr subendometrialresistenceandpulsatilityindexassessmentofendometrialreceptivityinassistedreproductivetechnologycycles
AT heliooliania subendometrialresistenceandpulsatilityindexassessmentofendometrialreceptivityinassistedreproductivetechnologycycles
AT vazolianid subendometrialresistenceandpulsatilityindexassessmentofendometrialreceptivityinassistedreproductivetechnologycycles
AT martinezdeoliveiraj subendometrialresistenceandpulsatilityindexassessmentofendometrialreceptivityinassistedreproductivetechnologycycles