Cargando…

T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA

BACKGROUND: T1 mapping sequences such as MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA make use of different technical approaches, bearing strengths and weaknesses. It is well known that obtained T1 relaxation times differ between the sequence techniques as well as between different hardware. Yet, T1 quantification is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heidenreich, Julius F., Weng, Andreas M., Donhauser, Julian, Greiser, Andreas, Chow, Kelvin, Nordbeck, Peter, Bley, Thorsten A., Köstler, Herbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0362-0
_version_ 1783440783145172992
author Heidenreich, Julius F.
Weng, Andreas M.
Donhauser, Julian
Greiser, Andreas
Chow, Kelvin
Nordbeck, Peter
Bley, Thorsten A.
Köstler, Herbert
author_facet Heidenreich, Julius F.
Weng, Andreas M.
Donhauser, Julian
Greiser, Andreas
Chow, Kelvin
Nordbeck, Peter
Bley, Thorsten A.
Köstler, Herbert
author_sort Heidenreich, Julius F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: T1 mapping sequences such as MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA make use of different technical approaches, bearing strengths and weaknesses. It is well known that obtained T1 relaxation times differ between the sequence techniques as well as between different hardware. Yet, T1 quantification is a promising tool for myocardial tissue characterization, disregarding the absence of established reference values. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of native and post-contrast T1 mapping methods as well as ECV maps and its diagnostic benefits in a clinical environment when scanning patients with various cardiac diseases at 3 T. METHODS: Native and post-contrast T1 mapping data acquired on a 3 T full-body scanner using the three pulse sequences 5(3)3 MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA in 19 patients with clinical indication for contrast enhanced MRI were compared. We analyzed global and segmental T1 relaxation times as well as respective extracellular volumes and compared the emerged differences between the used pulse sequences. RESULTS: T1 times acquired with MOLLI and ShMOLLI exhibited systematic T1 deviation compared to SASHA. Myocardial MOLLI T1 times were 19% lower and ShMOLLI T1 times 25% lower compared to SASHA. Native blood T1 times from MOLLI were 13% lower than SASHA, while post-contrast MOLLI T1-times were only 5% lower. ECV values exhibited comparably biased estimation with MOLLI and ShMOLLI compared to SASHA in good agreement with results reported in literature. Pathology-suspect segments were clearly differentiated from remote myocardium with all three sequences. CONCLUSION: Myocardial T1 mapping yields systematically biased pre- and post-contrast T1 times depending on the applied pulse sequence. Additionally calculating ECV attenuates this bias, making MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA better comparable. Therefore, myocardial T1 mapping is a powerful clinical tool for classification of soft tissue abnormalities in spite of the absence of established reference values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6676542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66765422019-08-06 T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA Heidenreich, Julius F. Weng, Andreas M. Donhauser, Julian Greiser, Andreas Chow, Kelvin Nordbeck, Peter Bley, Thorsten A. Köstler, Herbert BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: T1 mapping sequences such as MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA make use of different technical approaches, bearing strengths and weaknesses. It is well known that obtained T1 relaxation times differ between the sequence techniques as well as between different hardware. Yet, T1 quantification is a promising tool for myocardial tissue characterization, disregarding the absence of established reference values. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of native and post-contrast T1 mapping methods as well as ECV maps and its diagnostic benefits in a clinical environment when scanning patients with various cardiac diseases at 3 T. METHODS: Native and post-contrast T1 mapping data acquired on a 3 T full-body scanner using the three pulse sequences 5(3)3 MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA in 19 patients with clinical indication for contrast enhanced MRI were compared. We analyzed global and segmental T1 relaxation times as well as respective extracellular volumes and compared the emerged differences between the used pulse sequences. RESULTS: T1 times acquired with MOLLI and ShMOLLI exhibited systematic T1 deviation compared to SASHA. Myocardial MOLLI T1 times were 19% lower and ShMOLLI T1 times 25% lower compared to SASHA. Native blood T1 times from MOLLI were 13% lower than SASHA, while post-contrast MOLLI T1-times were only 5% lower. ECV values exhibited comparably biased estimation with MOLLI and ShMOLLI compared to SASHA in good agreement with results reported in literature. Pathology-suspect segments were clearly differentiated from remote myocardium with all three sequences. CONCLUSION: Myocardial T1 mapping yields systematically biased pre- and post-contrast T1 times depending on the applied pulse sequence. Additionally calculating ECV attenuates this bias, making MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA better comparable. Therefore, myocardial T1 mapping is a powerful clinical tool for classification of soft tissue abnormalities in spite of the absence of established reference values. BioMed Central 2019-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6676542/ /pubmed/31370821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0362-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heidenreich, Julius F.
Weng, Andreas M.
Donhauser, Julian
Greiser, Andreas
Chow, Kelvin
Nordbeck, Peter
Bley, Thorsten A.
Köstler, Herbert
T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA
title T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA
title_full T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA
title_fullStr T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA
title_full_unstemmed T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA
title_short T1- and ECV-mapping in clinical routine at 3 T: differences between MOLLI, ShMOLLI and SASHA
title_sort t1- and ecv-mapping in clinical routine at 3 t: differences between molli, shmolli and sasha
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0362-0
work_keys_str_mv AT heidenreichjuliusf t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha
AT wengandreasm t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha
AT donhauserjulian t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha
AT greiserandreas t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha
AT chowkelvin t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha
AT nordbeckpeter t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha
AT bleythorstena t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha
AT kostlerherbert t1andecvmappinginclinicalroutineat3tdifferencesbetweenmollishmolliandsasha