Cargando…

Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of published literature that demonstrates the impact of a Guide to Reading Biomedical English Literature course on new Chinese medical postgraduates. Keeping this gap in mind, the objectives of this study were to assess the factors associated with course effectiveness u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Zhipeng, Qiu, Jingfan, Yang, Bingya, Huang, Peng, Cai, Lei, Chen, Lin, Hou, Min, Ji, Minjun, Wu, Guanling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1731-7
_version_ 1783440790317432832
author Xu, Zhipeng
Qiu, Jingfan
Yang, Bingya
Huang, Peng
Cai, Lei
Chen, Lin
Hou, Min
Ji, Minjun
Wu, Guanling
author_facet Xu, Zhipeng
Qiu, Jingfan
Yang, Bingya
Huang, Peng
Cai, Lei
Chen, Lin
Hou, Min
Ji, Minjun
Wu, Guanling
author_sort Xu, Zhipeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of published literature that demonstrates the impact of a Guide to Reading Biomedical English Literature course on new Chinese medical postgraduates. Keeping this gap in mind, the objectives of this study were to assess the factors associated with course effectiveness using the teacher, postgraduate and organizational factors. METHODS: This study was conducted at Nanjing Medical University from December 2014 to December 2015. The participants were 440 new graduate students from different medical specialties. At baseline, each student was assessed for teacher factors, individual factors and organizational factors using a self-administered structured scored anonymous questionnaire. After that, Pearson chi-square analysis was conducted to evaluate the factors that impact teacher factors (knowledge level, teaching style, individualized teaching, logical teaching, heuristic teaching, literature difficulty, bilingual teaching), individual factors (gender, attitude toward studying, previewing literature, English literacy level) and course management (such as teaching objectives and assessment system) on this course. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of the above factors on our outcome variables (knowledge level, teaching style, individualized teaching, heuristic teaching, study attitude, previewing literature, management). RESULTS: Nearly all of the participants (420 of 440, 95.5%) thought this course was helpful for learning to read scientific literature and understanding scientific research design. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the participants perception of the course as effective was associated with teachers’ high knowledge level (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR = 49.673; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 4.28, 575.90). In addition, heuristic teaching was found to be significantly associated with a positive teaching effect of teaching (AOR = 12.76; 95% CI = 1.78, 91.64). Furthermore, the participants perception of the course as effective was associated with positive attitude toward studying (AOR = 25.004; 95% CI = 2.51, 249.09). Previewing literature was also associated with course effectiveness (AOR = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.04, 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the course effectiveness of the Guide for Reading Biomedical English Literature was associated with i) teachers’ knowledge, ii) heuristic teaching, iii) students’ positive attitude, and iv) students’ previewing literature. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1731-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6676574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66765742019-08-06 Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis Xu, Zhipeng Qiu, Jingfan Yang, Bingya Huang, Peng Cai, Lei Chen, Lin Hou, Min Ji, Minjun Wu, Guanling BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of published literature that demonstrates the impact of a Guide to Reading Biomedical English Literature course on new Chinese medical postgraduates. Keeping this gap in mind, the objectives of this study were to assess the factors associated with course effectiveness using the teacher, postgraduate and organizational factors. METHODS: This study was conducted at Nanjing Medical University from December 2014 to December 2015. The participants were 440 new graduate students from different medical specialties. At baseline, each student was assessed for teacher factors, individual factors and organizational factors using a self-administered structured scored anonymous questionnaire. After that, Pearson chi-square analysis was conducted to evaluate the factors that impact teacher factors (knowledge level, teaching style, individualized teaching, logical teaching, heuristic teaching, literature difficulty, bilingual teaching), individual factors (gender, attitude toward studying, previewing literature, English literacy level) and course management (such as teaching objectives and assessment system) on this course. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of the above factors on our outcome variables (knowledge level, teaching style, individualized teaching, heuristic teaching, study attitude, previewing literature, management). RESULTS: Nearly all of the participants (420 of 440, 95.5%) thought this course was helpful for learning to read scientific literature and understanding scientific research design. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the participants perception of the course as effective was associated with teachers’ high knowledge level (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR = 49.673; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 4.28, 575.90). In addition, heuristic teaching was found to be significantly associated with a positive teaching effect of teaching (AOR = 12.76; 95% CI = 1.78, 91.64). Furthermore, the participants perception of the course as effective was associated with positive attitude toward studying (AOR = 25.004; 95% CI = 2.51, 249.09). Previewing literature was also associated with course effectiveness (AOR = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.04, 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the course effectiveness of the Guide for Reading Biomedical English Literature was associated with i) teachers’ knowledge, ii) heuristic teaching, iii) students’ positive attitude, and iv) students’ previewing literature. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1731-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6676574/ /pubmed/31370838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1731-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Zhipeng
Qiu, Jingfan
Yang, Bingya
Huang, Peng
Cai, Lei
Chen, Lin
Hou, Min
Ji, Minjun
Wu, Guanling
Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis
title Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis
title_full Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis
title_short Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis
title_sort evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical english literature course for chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1731-7
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhipeng evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT qiujingfan evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT yangbingya evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT huangpeng evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT cailei evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT chenlin evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT houmin evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT jiminjun evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis
AT wuguanling evaluationoffactorsinfluencingtheguidetoreadbiomedicalenglishliteraturecourseforchinesenewmedicalpostgraduatesamultipleregressionanalysis