Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing primary tumor resection (PTR) to palliative treatment for advanced-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) were limited by strong selection bias. We used multiple methods to control for confounding and selection bias to estimate the effect of PTR on surviv...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5966-9 |
_version_ | 1783440791751884800 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Ke Li, Wei Han, Jun Wu, Hong |
author_facet | Sun, Ke Li, Wei Han, Jun Wu, Hong |
author_sort | Sun, Ke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing primary tumor resection (PTR) to palliative treatment for advanced-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) were limited by strong selection bias. We used multiple methods to control for confounding and selection bias to estimate the effect of PTR on survival for late-stage PDA. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry database for 2004 through 2014 was retrieved for the present study. A total of 4322 patients with stage III (AJCC, 6th) PDA were included in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to eliminate possible bias. In addition, instrumental variable (IV) analysis was utilized to adjust for both measured and unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: A total of 4322 patients with stage III PDA including 552 (12.8%) who underwent PTR, 3770 (87.2%) without PTR, were identified. In the multivariable cohort, a clear prognostic advantage of PTR was observed in overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (P < 0.001) compared to patients after non-surgery therapy. In the PSM cohort, patients in PTR group showed a better OS and DSS (both P values < 0.001) compared to patients in non-surgery group. The survival benefit of PTR for stage III PDA was not observed in the two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) model. Estimates based on this instrument indicated that patients treated with PTR had similar OS (P = 0.448) and DSS (P = 0.719). In IV analyses stratified by chemotherapy and tumor location, patients undergoing PTR had similar OS and DSS compared to patients in non-surgery group across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Survival with PTR did not differ significantly from palliative treatment in marginal patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma. High-quality randomized trials are needed to validate these results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5966-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6676580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66765802019-08-06 Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma Sun, Ke Li, Wei Han, Jun Wu, Hong BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing primary tumor resection (PTR) to palliative treatment for advanced-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) were limited by strong selection bias. We used multiple methods to control for confounding and selection bias to estimate the effect of PTR on survival for late-stage PDA. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry database for 2004 through 2014 was retrieved for the present study. A total of 4322 patients with stage III (AJCC, 6th) PDA were included in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to eliminate possible bias. In addition, instrumental variable (IV) analysis was utilized to adjust for both measured and unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: A total of 4322 patients with stage III PDA including 552 (12.8%) who underwent PTR, 3770 (87.2%) without PTR, were identified. In the multivariable cohort, a clear prognostic advantage of PTR was observed in overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (P < 0.001) compared to patients after non-surgery therapy. In the PSM cohort, patients in PTR group showed a better OS and DSS (both P values < 0.001) compared to patients in non-surgery group. The survival benefit of PTR for stage III PDA was not observed in the two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) model. Estimates based on this instrument indicated that patients treated with PTR had similar OS (P = 0.448) and DSS (P = 0.719). In IV analyses stratified by chemotherapy and tumor location, patients undergoing PTR had similar OS and DSS compared to patients in non-surgery group across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Survival with PTR did not differ significantly from palliative treatment in marginal patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma. High-quality randomized trials are needed to validate these results. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5966-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6676580/ /pubmed/31370893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5966-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sun, Ke Li, Wei Han, Jun Wu, Hong Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title | Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of primary tumor resection in patients with stage iii pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6676580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5966-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunke comparativeeffectivenessofprimarytumorresectioninpatientswithstageiiipancreaticadenocarcinoma AT liwei comparativeeffectivenessofprimarytumorresectioninpatientswithstageiiipancreaticadenocarcinoma AT hanjun comparativeeffectivenessofprimarytumorresectioninpatientswithstageiiipancreaticadenocarcinoma AT wuhong comparativeeffectivenessofprimarytumorresectioninpatientswithstageiiipancreaticadenocarcinoma |