Cargando…
Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man
To demonstrate the feasibility of robotic middle ear access in a clinical setting, nine adult patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss indicated for cochlear implantation were included in this clinical trial. A keyhole access tunnel to the tympanic cavity and targeting the round window was plan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31374092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220543 |
_version_ | 1783440896240386048 |
---|---|
author | Caversaccio, Marco Wimmer, Wilhelm Anso, Juan Mantokoudis, Georgios Gerber, Nicolas Rathgeb, Christoph Schneider, Daniel Hermann, Jan Wagner, Franca Scheidegger, Olivier Huth, Markus Anschuetz, Lukas Kompis, Martin Williamson, Tom Bell, Brett Gavaghan, Kate Weber, Stefan |
author_facet | Caversaccio, Marco Wimmer, Wilhelm Anso, Juan Mantokoudis, Georgios Gerber, Nicolas Rathgeb, Christoph Schneider, Daniel Hermann, Jan Wagner, Franca Scheidegger, Olivier Huth, Markus Anschuetz, Lukas Kompis, Martin Williamson, Tom Bell, Brett Gavaghan, Kate Weber, Stefan |
author_sort | Caversaccio, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | To demonstrate the feasibility of robotic middle ear access in a clinical setting, nine adult patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss indicated for cochlear implantation were included in this clinical trial. A keyhole access tunnel to the tympanic cavity and targeting the round window was planned based on preoperatively acquired computed tomography image data and robotically drilled to the level of the facial recess. Intraoperative imaging was performed to confirm sufficient distance of the drilling trajectory to relevant anatomy. Robotic drilling continued toward the round window. The cochlear access was manually created by the surgeon. Electrode arrays were inserted through the keyhole tunnel under microscopic supervision via a tympanomeatal flap. All patients were successfully implanted with a cochlear implant. In 9 of 9 patients the robotic drilling was planned and performed to the level of the facial recess. In 3 patients, the procedure was reverted to a conventional approach for safety reasons. No change in facial nerve function compared to baseline measurements was observed. Robotic keyhole access for cochlear implantation is feasible. Further improvements to workflow complexity, duration of surgery, and usability including safety assessments are required to enable wider adoption of the procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6677292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66772922019-08-06 Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man Caversaccio, Marco Wimmer, Wilhelm Anso, Juan Mantokoudis, Georgios Gerber, Nicolas Rathgeb, Christoph Schneider, Daniel Hermann, Jan Wagner, Franca Scheidegger, Olivier Huth, Markus Anschuetz, Lukas Kompis, Martin Williamson, Tom Bell, Brett Gavaghan, Kate Weber, Stefan PLoS One Research Article To demonstrate the feasibility of robotic middle ear access in a clinical setting, nine adult patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss indicated for cochlear implantation were included in this clinical trial. A keyhole access tunnel to the tympanic cavity and targeting the round window was planned based on preoperatively acquired computed tomography image data and robotically drilled to the level of the facial recess. Intraoperative imaging was performed to confirm sufficient distance of the drilling trajectory to relevant anatomy. Robotic drilling continued toward the round window. The cochlear access was manually created by the surgeon. Electrode arrays were inserted through the keyhole tunnel under microscopic supervision via a tympanomeatal flap. All patients were successfully implanted with a cochlear implant. In 9 of 9 patients the robotic drilling was planned and performed to the level of the facial recess. In 3 patients, the procedure was reverted to a conventional approach for safety reasons. No change in facial nerve function compared to baseline measurements was observed. Robotic keyhole access for cochlear implantation is feasible. Further improvements to workflow complexity, duration of surgery, and usability including safety assessments are required to enable wider adoption of the procedure. Public Library of Science 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6677292/ /pubmed/31374092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220543 Text en © 2019 Caversaccio et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Caversaccio, Marco Wimmer, Wilhelm Anso, Juan Mantokoudis, Georgios Gerber, Nicolas Rathgeb, Christoph Schneider, Daniel Hermann, Jan Wagner, Franca Scheidegger, Olivier Huth, Markus Anschuetz, Lukas Kompis, Martin Williamson, Tom Bell, Brett Gavaghan, Kate Weber, Stefan Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man |
title | Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man |
title_full | Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man |
title_fullStr | Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man |
title_short | Robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: First in man |
title_sort | robotic middle ear access for cochlear implantation: first in man |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31374092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caversacciomarco roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT wimmerwilhelm roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT ansojuan roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT mantokoudisgeorgios roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT gerbernicolas roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT rathgebchristoph roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT schneiderdaniel roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT hermannjan roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT wagnerfranca roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT scheideggerolivier roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT huthmarkus roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT anschuetzlukas roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT kompismartin roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT williamsontom roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT bellbrett roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT gavaghankate roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman AT weberstefan roboticmiddleearaccessforcochlearimplantationfirstinman |