Cargando…
Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study
INTRODUCTION: bonded fixed retainers are often used to stabilize the results obtained with the orthodontic treatment. It is important that they do not prejudice dental health, as they will be used for a long period. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare periodontal indexes betwe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.064-070.oar |
_version_ | 1783440907073224704 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Larissa A. Sapata, Diogo M. Provenzano, Maria G. A. Hayacibara, Roberto M. Ramos, Adilson L. |
author_facet | Ferreira, Larissa A. Sapata, Diogo M. Provenzano, Maria G. A. Hayacibara, Roberto M. Ramos, Adilson L. |
author_sort | Ferreira, Larissa A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: bonded fixed retainers are often used to stabilize the results obtained with the orthodontic treatment. It is important that they do not prejudice dental health, as they will be used for a long period. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare periodontal indexes between two types of bonded fixed retainers, conventional 3 x 3 plain retainer (0.8-mm orthodontic wire, bonded to the canines only) and a manufactured braided retainer (0.2 x 0.7-mm stainless steel wire, bonded to all anterior teeth) after use. METHODS: a test group of 15 volunteers (aged from 18 to 25 years) used both the conventional retainer and braided retainer for six months. A randomized longitudinal study design, with a two week washout interval, was applied. The dental plaque index, gingival index and dental calculus index were evaluated. Furthermore, the calculus accumulated along the retainer wire was measured and all patients answered a questionnaire about the use, acceptance and comfort of both types of retainers. RESULTS: the scores for plaque and gingival indexes were higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05) on the lingual and proximal surfaces. The same occurred with the calculus index on the lingual surfaces (p< 0.05). The calculus index along wire was higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05). All patients preferred the conventional retainer, and said that it was also more comfortable to use. CONCLUSION: it was concluded that the conventional retainer showed better periodontal indexes than the braided type. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6677337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66773372019-08-26 Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study Ferreira, Larissa A. Sapata, Diogo M. Provenzano, Maria G. A. Hayacibara, Roberto M. Ramos, Adilson L. Dental Press J Orthod Original Article INTRODUCTION: bonded fixed retainers are often used to stabilize the results obtained with the orthodontic treatment. It is important that they do not prejudice dental health, as they will be used for a long period. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare periodontal indexes between two types of bonded fixed retainers, conventional 3 x 3 plain retainer (0.8-mm orthodontic wire, bonded to the canines only) and a manufactured braided retainer (0.2 x 0.7-mm stainless steel wire, bonded to all anterior teeth) after use. METHODS: a test group of 15 volunteers (aged from 18 to 25 years) used both the conventional retainer and braided retainer for six months. A randomized longitudinal study design, with a two week washout interval, was applied. The dental plaque index, gingival index and dental calculus index were evaluated. Furthermore, the calculus accumulated along the retainer wire was measured and all patients answered a questionnaire about the use, acceptance and comfort of both types of retainers. RESULTS: the scores for plaque and gingival indexes were higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05) on the lingual and proximal surfaces. The same occurred with the calculus index on the lingual surfaces (p< 0.05). The calculus index along wire was higher for the braided retainer (p< 0.05). All patients preferred the conventional retainer, and said that it was also more comfortable to use. CONCLUSION: it was concluded that the conventional retainer showed better periodontal indexes than the braided type. Dental Press International 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6677337/ /pubmed/31390451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.064-070.oar Text en © 2019 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ferreira, Larissa A. Sapata, Diogo M. Provenzano, Maria G. A. Hayacibara, Roberto M. Ramos, Adilson L. Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study |
title | Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study |
title_full | Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study |
title_fullStr | Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study |
title_full_unstemmed | Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study |
title_short | Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study |
title_sort | periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.064-070.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiralarissaa periodontalparametersoftwotypesof3x3orthodonticretaineralongitudinalstudy AT sapatadiogom periodontalparametersoftwotypesof3x3orthodonticretaineralongitudinalstudy AT provenzanomariaga periodontalparametersoftwotypesof3x3orthodonticretaineralongitudinalstudy AT hayacibararobertom periodontalparametersoftwotypesof3x3orthodonticretaineralongitudinalstudy AT ramosadilsonl periodontalparametersoftwotypesof3x3orthodonticretaineralongitudinalstudy |