Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial

Background Drug-related problems (DRP) following hospital discharge may cause morbidity, mortality and hospital re-admissions. It is unclear whether a clinical medication review (CMR) and counseling at discharge is a cost-effective method to reduce DRP. Objective To assess the effect of a CMR on hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Heijden, Amber A. W. A., de Bruijne, Martine C., Nijpels, Giel, Hugtenburg, Jacqueline G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00825-3
_version_ 1783440931564814336
author van der Heijden, Amber A. W. A.
de Bruijne, Martine C.
Nijpels, Giel
Hugtenburg, Jacqueline G.
author_facet van der Heijden, Amber A. W. A.
de Bruijne, Martine C.
Nijpels, Giel
Hugtenburg, Jacqueline G.
author_sort van der Heijden, Amber A. W. A.
collection PubMed
description Background Drug-related problems (DRP) following hospital discharge may cause morbidity, mortality and hospital re-admissions. It is unclear whether a clinical medication review (CMR) and counseling at discharge is a cost-effective method to reduce DRP. Objective To assess the effect of a CMR on health care utilization and to investigate whether CMR is a cost-effective method to reduce DRP in older polypharmacy patients discharged from hospital. Setting 24 community pharmacies in the Netherlands. Method A cluster-randomized controlled trial with an economic evaluation. Community pharmacies were randomized to those providing a CMR, counseling and follow-up at discharge and those providing usual care. Main outcome measures Change in the number of DRP after 1 year of follow-up and costs of health care utilization during follow-up. In 216 patients the use of health care was prospectively assessed. Missing data on effects and costs were imputed using multiple imputation techniques. Bootstrapping techniques were used to estimate the uncertainty around the differences in costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results CMR resulted in a small reduction of DRP. The proportion of patients readmitted to the hospital during 6 months of follow-up was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (46.4 vs. 20.9%; p < 0.05). Health care costs were higher in the intervention group, although not statistically significant. The costs of reducing one DRP by a CMR amounted to €8270. Conclusion A CMR in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge led to a small reduction in DRP. Because of a significantly higher use of health care and higher number of re-hospitalisations post CMR, the present study data indicate that performing the intervention in this patient population is not cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6677673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66776732019-08-16 Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial van der Heijden, Amber A. W. A. de Bruijne, Martine C. Nijpels, Giel Hugtenburg, Jacqueline G. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article Background Drug-related problems (DRP) following hospital discharge may cause morbidity, mortality and hospital re-admissions. It is unclear whether a clinical medication review (CMR) and counseling at discharge is a cost-effective method to reduce DRP. Objective To assess the effect of a CMR on health care utilization and to investigate whether CMR is a cost-effective method to reduce DRP in older polypharmacy patients discharged from hospital. Setting 24 community pharmacies in the Netherlands. Method A cluster-randomized controlled trial with an economic evaluation. Community pharmacies were randomized to those providing a CMR, counseling and follow-up at discharge and those providing usual care. Main outcome measures Change in the number of DRP after 1 year of follow-up and costs of health care utilization during follow-up. In 216 patients the use of health care was prospectively assessed. Missing data on effects and costs were imputed using multiple imputation techniques. Bootstrapping techniques were used to estimate the uncertainty around the differences in costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results CMR resulted in a small reduction of DRP. The proportion of patients readmitted to the hospital during 6 months of follow-up was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (46.4 vs. 20.9%; p < 0.05). Health care costs were higher in the intervention group, although not statistically significant. The costs of reducing one DRP by a CMR amounted to €8270. Conclusion A CMR in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge led to a small reduction in DRP. Because of a significantly higher use of health care and higher number of re-hospitalisations post CMR, the present study data indicate that performing the intervention in this patient population is not cost-effective. Springer International Publishing 2019-06-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6677673/ /pubmed/31209718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00825-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Heijden, Amber A. W. A.
de Bruijne, Martine C.
Nijpels, Giel
Hugtenburg, Jacqueline G.
Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial
title Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00825-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderheijdenamberawa costeffectivenessofaclinicalmedicationreviewinvulnerableolderpatientsathospitaldischargearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT debruijnemartinec costeffectivenessofaclinicalmedicationreviewinvulnerableolderpatientsathospitaldischargearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nijpelsgiel costeffectivenessofaclinicalmedicationreviewinvulnerableolderpatientsathospitaldischargearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hugtenburgjacquelineg costeffectivenessofaclinicalmedicationreviewinvulnerableolderpatientsathospitaldischargearandomizedcontrolledtrial