Cargando…

Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a supervised 18-week high-intensity exercise program compared with usual care in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. METHODS: One hundred nine patients were randomly assigned to the exercise interventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dongen, Johanna M., Persoon, Saskia, Jongeneel, Gabrielle, Bosmans, Judith E., Kersten, Marie José, Brug, Johannes, Nollet, Frans, Chinapaw, Mai J. M., Buffart, Laurien M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00775-9
_version_ 1783440938367975424
author van Dongen, Johanna M.
Persoon, Saskia
Jongeneel, Gabrielle
Bosmans, Judith E.
Kersten, Marie José
Brug, Johannes
Nollet, Frans
Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
Buffart, Laurien M.
author_facet van Dongen, Johanna M.
Persoon, Saskia
Jongeneel, Gabrielle
Bosmans, Judith E.
Kersten, Marie José
Brug, Johannes
Nollet, Frans
Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
Buffart, Laurien M.
author_sort van Dongen, Johanna M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a supervised 18-week high-intensity exercise program compared with usual care in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. METHODS: One hundred nine patients were randomly assigned to the exercise intervention (n = 54) or the usual care control group (n = 55). Data on cardiorespiratory fitness (VO(2)peak), handgrip strength, general fatigue, and health-related quality of life (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) were collected at baseline (T0), after completion of the exercise intervention or at a similar time point in the control group (T1) and 12 months later (T2). Cost questionnaires were used to assess societal costs. Long-term effectiveness (at T2) was evaluated using linear mixed model analyses. For the economic evaluation, missing data were imputed using multiple imputation, and data were analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: At T2, no statistically significant differences were found between the intervention and control group for VO(2)peak (0.12; 95%CI − 1.89; 2.14 ml/min/kg), handgrip strength (− 1.08; 95%CI− 2.47; 2.31), and general fatigue (− 0.69; 95%CI − 2.52; 1.14). During 12-months follow-up, no significant between-group differences in QALYs and societal costs were found (QALYs − 0.07; 95%CI − 0.17; 0.04; costs 529; 95%CI − 3205;4452). Intervention costs were €1340 per patient. For all outcomes, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was low at reasonable values of willingness-to-pay. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence for the exercise intervention being effective on physical fitness and fatigue, nor cost-effective from a societal perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on 27 May 2010 at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2341). IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The current exercise intervention should not be recommended to patients recently treated with autologous stem cell transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6677707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66777072019-08-16 Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study van Dongen, Johanna M. Persoon, Saskia Jongeneel, Gabrielle Bosmans, Judith E. Kersten, Marie José Brug, Johannes Nollet, Frans Chinapaw, Mai J. M. Buffart, Laurien M. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a supervised 18-week high-intensity exercise program compared with usual care in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. METHODS: One hundred nine patients were randomly assigned to the exercise intervention (n = 54) or the usual care control group (n = 55). Data on cardiorespiratory fitness (VO(2)peak), handgrip strength, general fatigue, and health-related quality of life (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) were collected at baseline (T0), after completion of the exercise intervention or at a similar time point in the control group (T1) and 12 months later (T2). Cost questionnaires were used to assess societal costs. Long-term effectiveness (at T2) was evaluated using linear mixed model analyses. For the economic evaluation, missing data were imputed using multiple imputation, and data were analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: At T2, no statistically significant differences were found between the intervention and control group for VO(2)peak (0.12; 95%CI − 1.89; 2.14 ml/min/kg), handgrip strength (− 1.08; 95%CI− 2.47; 2.31), and general fatigue (− 0.69; 95%CI − 2.52; 1.14). During 12-months follow-up, no significant between-group differences in QALYs and societal costs were found (QALYs − 0.07; 95%CI − 0.17; 0.04; costs 529; 95%CI − 3205;4452). Intervention costs were €1340 per patient. For all outcomes, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was low at reasonable values of willingness-to-pay. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence for the exercise intervention being effective on physical fitness and fatigue, nor cost-effective from a societal perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on 27 May 2010 at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2341). IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The current exercise intervention should not be recommended to patients recently treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. Springer US 2019-07-08 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6677707/ /pubmed/31286387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00775-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
van Dongen, Johanna M.
Persoon, Saskia
Jongeneel, Gabrielle
Bosmans, Judith E.
Kersten, Marie José
Brug, Johannes
Nollet, Frans
Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
Buffart, Laurien M.
Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study
title Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study
title_full Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study
title_fullStr Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study
title_short Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study
title_sort long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the exist study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00775-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vandongenjohannam longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT persoonsaskia longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT jongeneelgabrielle longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT bosmansjudithe longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT kerstenmariejose longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT brugjohannes longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT nolletfrans longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT chinapawmaijm longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy
AT buffartlaurienm longtermeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofan18weeksupervisedexerciseprograminpatientstreatedwithautologousstemcelltransplantationresultsfromtheexiststudy