Cargando…
A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection
Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is a statistical method that links two types of information such as phenotypic data (trait measurements) and genotypic data (usually molecular markers). There a number of QTL tools have been developed for gene linkage mapping. Standard Interval Mapping (SIM) o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Biomedical Informatics
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435154 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630015090 |
_version_ | 1783440979027558400 |
---|---|
author | Akond, Zobaer Alam, Md.Jahangir Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol Uddin, Md.Shalim Alam, Munirul Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque |
author_facet | Akond, Zobaer Alam, Md.Jahangir Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol Uddin, Md.Shalim Alam, Munirul Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque |
author_sort | Akond, Zobaer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is a statistical method that links two types of information such as phenotypic data (trait measurements) and genotypic data (usually molecular markers). There a number of QTL tools have been developed for gene linkage mapping. Standard Interval Mapping (SIM) or Simple Interval Mapping or Interval Mapping (IM), Haley Knott, Extended Haley Knott and Multiple Imputation (IMP) method when the single-QTL is unlinked and Composite Interval Mapping (CIM) is designed to map the genetic linkage for both linked and unlinked genes in the chromosome. Performance of these methods is measured based on calculated LOD score. The QTLs are considered significant above the threshold LOD score 3.0. For backcross-simulated data, the CIM method performs significantly in detecting QTLs compare to other SIM mapping methods. CIM detected three QTLs in chromosome 1 and 4 whereas the other methods were unable to detect any significant marker positions for simulated data. For a real rice dataset, CIM also showed performance considerably in detecting marker positions compared to other four interval mapping methods. CIM finally detected 12 QTL positions while each of the other four SIM methods detected only six positions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6677906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Biomedical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66779062019-08-21 A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection Akond, Zobaer Alam, Md.Jahangir Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol Uddin, Md.Shalim Alam, Munirul Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque Bioinformation Research Article Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is a statistical method that links two types of information such as phenotypic data (trait measurements) and genotypic data (usually molecular markers). There a number of QTL tools have been developed for gene linkage mapping. Standard Interval Mapping (SIM) or Simple Interval Mapping or Interval Mapping (IM), Haley Knott, Extended Haley Knott and Multiple Imputation (IMP) method when the single-QTL is unlinked and Composite Interval Mapping (CIM) is designed to map the genetic linkage for both linked and unlinked genes in the chromosome. Performance of these methods is measured based on calculated LOD score. The QTLs are considered significant above the threshold LOD score 3.0. For backcross-simulated data, the CIM method performs significantly in detecting QTLs compare to other SIM mapping methods. CIM detected three QTLs in chromosome 1 and 4 whereas the other methods were unable to detect any significant marker positions for simulated data. For a real rice dataset, CIM also showed performance considerably in detecting marker positions compared to other four interval mapping methods. CIM finally detected 12 QTL positions while each of the other four SIM methods detected only six positions. Biomedical Informatics 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6677906/ /pubmed/31435154 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630015090 Text en © 2019 Biomedical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Akond, Zobaer Alam, Md.Jahangir Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol Uddin, Md.Shalim Alam, Munirul Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection |
title | A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection |
title_full | A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection |
title_fullStr | A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection |
title_short | A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection |
title_sort | comparison on some interval mapping approaches for qtl detection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435154 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630015090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akondzobaer acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT alammdjahangir acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT hasanmohammadnazmol acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT uddinmdshalim acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT alammunirul acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT mollahmdnurulhaque acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT akondzobaer comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT alammdjahangir comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT hasanmohammadnazmol comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT uddinmdshalim comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT alammunirul comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection AT mollahmdnurulhaque comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection |