Cargando…

A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection

Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is a statistical method that links two types of information such as phenotypic data (trait measurements) and genotypic data (usually molecular markers). There a number of QTL tools have been developed for gene linkage mapping. Standard Interval Mapping (SIM) o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akond, Zobaer, Alam, Md.Jahangir, Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol, Uddin, Md.Shalim, Alam, Munirul, Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435154
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630015090
_version_ 1783440979027558400
author Akond, Zobaer
Alam, Md.Jahangir
Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol
Uddin, Md.Shalim
Alam, Munirul
Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque
author_facet Akond, Zobaer
Alam, Md.Jahangir
Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol
Uddin, Md.Shalim
Alam, Munirul
Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque
author_sort Akond, Zobaer
collection PubMed
description Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is a statistical method that links two types of information such as phenotypic data (trait measurements) and genotypic data (usually molecular markers). There a number of QTL tools have been developed for gene linkage mapping. Standard Interval Mapping (SIM) or Simple Interval Mapping or Interval Mapping (IM), Haley Knott, Extended Haley Knott and Multiple Imputation (IMP) method when the single-QTL is unlinked and Composite Interval Mapping (CIM) is designed to map the genetic linkage for both linked and unlinked genes in the chromosome. Performance of these methods is measured based on calculated LOD score. The QTLs are considered significant above the threshold LOD score 3.0. For backcross-simulated data, the CIM method performs significantly in detecting QTLs compare to other SIM mapping methods. CIM detected three QTLs in chromosome 1 and 4 whereas the other methods were unable to detect any significant marker positions for simulated data. For a real rice dataset, CIM also showed performance considerably in detecting marker positions compared to other four interval mapping methods. CIM finally detected 12 QTL positions while each of the other four SIM methods detected only six positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6677906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66779062019-08-21 A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection Akond, Zobaer Alam, Md.Jahangir Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol Uddin, Md.Shalim Alam, Munirul Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque Bioinformation Research Article Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis is a statistical method that links two types of information such as phenotypic data (trait measurements) and genotypic data (usually molecular markers). There a number of QTL tools have been developed for gene linkage mapping. Standard Interval Mapping (SIM) or Simple Interval Mapping or Interval Mapping (IM), Haley Knott, Extended Haley Knott and Multiple Imputation (IMP) method when the single-QTL is unlinked and Composite Interval Mapping (CIM) is designed to map the genetic linkage for both linked and unlinked genes in the chromosome. Performance of these methods is measured based on calculated LOD score. The QTLs are considered significant above the threshold LOD score 3.0. For backcross-simulated data, the CIM method performs significantly in detecting QTLs compare to other SIM mapping methods. CIM detected three QTLs in chromosome 1 and 4 whereas the other methods were unable to detect any significant marker positions for simulated data. For a real rice dataset, CIM also showed performance considerably in detecting marker positions compared to other four interval mapping methods. CIM finally detected 12 QTL positions while each of the other four SIM methods detected only six positions. Biomedical Informatics 2019-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6677906/ /pubmed/31435154 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630015090 Text en © 2019 Biomedical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Akond, Zobaer
Alam, Md.Jahangir
Hasan, Mohammad Nazmol
Uddin, Md.Shalim
Alam, Munirul
Mollah, Md.Nurul Haque
A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection
title A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection
title_full A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection
title_fullStr A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection
title_short A Comparison on Some Interval Mapping Approaches for QTL Detection
title_sort comparison on some interval mapping approaches for qtl detection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435154
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630015090
work_keys_str_mv AT akondzobaer acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT alammdjahangir acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT hasanmohammadnazmol acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT uddinmdshalim acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT alammunirul acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT mollahmdnurulhaque acomparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT akondzobaer comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT alammdjahangir comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT hasanmohammadnazmol comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT uddinmdshalim comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT alammunirul comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection
AT mollahmdnurulhaque comparisononsomeintervalmappingapproachesforqtldetection