Cargando…
Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the treatment of choice for the management of patients with shoulder subacromial pain. However, we do not know whether a tailored rehabilitation programme is more effective than a standardised strengthening programme. The aim of this feasibility trial is to assess:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028261 |
_version_ | 1783440996129832960 |
---|---|
author | Ribeiro, Daniel C Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh Sole, Gisela Abbott, J Haxby |
author_facet | Ribeiro, Daniel C Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh Sole, Gisela Abbott, J Haxby |
author_sort | Ribeiro, Daniel C |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the treatment of choice for the management of patients with shoulder subacromial pain. However, we do not know whether a tailored rehabilitation programme is more effective than a standardised strengthening programme. The aim of this feasibility trial is to assess: (1) participant recruitment rate, (2) the proportion of participants enrolled from the total number screened, (3) adherence to the rehabilitation programme, (4) drop-out rates, (5) obtain estimates of adverse reactions to treatment, (6) obtain estimates of intervention effects in order to inform the sample size of the fully-powered randomised controlled trial, (7) conduct a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of the standardised strengthening and the tailored rehabilitation interventions. METHODS: The MAnagement of Subacromial disorders of The shouldER (MASTER) trial, is a two-arm, patient-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Participants will be randomly allocated into one of the interventions group: tailored or standardised rehabilitation. To obtain estimates of intervention effects, we will compare changes in pain and shoulder-related disability scores between the two intervention groups using a repeated mixed-model analysis of variance, with alpha set at 0.05, and power at 80%. Since this is a feasibility study, we will not adjust alpha for multiple comparisons. To determine whether it is feasible to conduct the full trial, we will consider 75% CI as the probability threshold at 3-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Otago Ethics Committee (Ref: H17/080). Findings from this study will be presented at national and international conferences, and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR: 12617001405303 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6677989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66779892019-08-16 Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) Ribeiro, Daniel C Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh Sole, Gisela Abbott, J Haxby BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Exercise therapy is the treatment of choice for the management of patients with shoulder subacromial pain. However, we do not know whether a tailored rehabilitation programme is more effective than a standardised strengthening programme. The aim of this feasibility trial is to assess: (1) participant recruitment rate, (2) the proportion of participants enrolled from the total number screened, (3) adherence to the rehabilitation programme, (4) drop-out rates, (5) obtain estimates of adverse reactions to treatment, (6) obtain estimates of intervention effects in order to inform the sample size of the fully-powered randomised controlled trial, (7) conduct a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of the standardised strengthening and the tailored rehabilitation interventions. METHODS: The MAnagement of Subacromial disorders of The shouldER (MASTER) trial, is a two-arm, patient-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Participants will be randomly allocated into one of the interventions group: tailored or standardised rehabilitation. To obtain estimates of intervention effects, we will compare changes in pain and shoulder-related disability scores between the two intervention groups using a repeated mixed-model analysis of variance, with alpha set at 0.05, and power at 80%. Since this is a feasibility study, we will not adjust alpha for multiple comparisons. To determine whether it is feasible to conduct the full trial, we will consider 75% CI as the probability threshold at 3-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Otago Ethics Committee (Ref: H17/080). Findings from this study will be presented at national and international conferences, and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR: 12617001405303 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6677989/ /pubmed/31366649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028261 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Ribeiro, Daniel C Jafarian Tangrood, Zohreh Sole, Gisela Abbott, J Haxby Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) |
title | Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) |
title_full | Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) |
title_short | Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial) |
title_sort | effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the otago master trial) |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribeirodanielc effectivenessofatailoredrehabilitationversusstandardstrengtheningprogrammeforpatientswithshoulderpainaprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial AT jafariantangroodzohreh effectivenessofatailoredrehabilitationversusstandardstrengtheningprogrammeforpatientswithshoulderpainaprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial AT solegisela effectivenessofatailoredrehabilitationversusstandardstrengtheningprogrammeforpatientswithshoulderpainaprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial AT abbottjhaxby effectivenessofatailoredrehabilitationversusstandardstrengtheningprogrammeforpatientswithshoulderpainaprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialtheotagomastertrial |