Cargando…

Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a common feature of people’s reproductive lives. However, the economic implications of abortion and policies affecting abortion provision are poorly understood. This scoping review aims to systematically review social science literature for studies that have investigated th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coast, Ernestina, Lattof, Samantha R, van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana, Moore, Brittany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029939
_version_ 1783441000391245824
author Coast, Ernestina
Lattof, Samantha R
van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana
Moore, Brittany
author_facet Coast, Ernestina
Lattof, Samantha R
van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana
Moore, Brittany
author_sort Coast, Ernestina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a common feature of people’s reproductive lives. However, the economic implications of abortion and policies affecting abortion provision are poorly understood. This scoping review aims to systematically review social science literature for studies that have investigated the impact of abortion care (ie, un/safe abortion, post-abortion care) or abortion policies on economic outcomes at the micro-levels (ie, abortion seekers and their households), meso-levels (ie, communities and health systems) and macro-levels (ie, societies and nation states). Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline for protocols, this protocol details the scoping review’s methodological and analytical approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will utilise the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region will be considered. For inclusion, studies must examine one of the following economic outcomes at the micro-levels, meso-levels and/or macro-levels: costs, benefits, impacts and/or value of abortion care or abortion policies. Searches will be conducted in eight electronic databases. We will conduct the searches and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria according to the PRISMA-ScR flow approach. No assessments of items’ quality will be made, as the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and describe the coverage of the evidence. After extracting all data, we will inductively develop an economic framework around the economics of abortion. The analysis will synthesise the evidence base and identify knowledge gaps on the costs and benefits of abortion to stakeholders at various levels. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and condensed summaries for key stakeholders and partners in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6678010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66780102019-08-16 Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol Coast, Ernestina Lattof, Samantha R van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana Moore, Brittany BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a common feature of people’s reproductive lives. However, the economic implications of abortion and policies affecting abortion provision are poorly understood. This scoping review aims to systematically review social science literature for studies that have investigated the impact of abortion care (ie, un/safe abortion, post-abortion care) or abortion policies on economic outcomes at the micro-levels (ie, abortion seekers and their households), meso-levels (ie, communities and health systems) and macro-levels (ie, societies and nation states). Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline for protocols, this protocol details the scoping review’s methodological and analytical approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will utilise the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region will be considered. For inclusion, studies must examine one of the following economic outcomes at the micro-levels, meso-levels and/or macro-levels: costs, benefits, impacts and/or value of abortion care or abortion policies. Searches will be conducted in eight electronic databases. We will conduct the searches and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria according to the PRISMA-ScR flow approach. No assessments of items’ quality will be made, as the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and describe the coverage of the evidence. After extracting all data, we will inductively develop an economic framework around the economics of abortion. The analysis will synthesise the evidence base and identify knowledge gaps on the costs and benefits of abortion to stakeholders at various levels. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and condensed summaries for key stakeholders and partners in the field. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6678010/ /pubmed/31366662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029939 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Reproductive Medicine
Coast, Ernestina
Lattof, Samantha R
van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana
Moore, Brittany
Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
title Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
title_full Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
title_short Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
title_sort economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
topic Reproductive Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029939
work_keys_str_mv AT coasternestina economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol
AT lattofsamanthar economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol
AT vandermeulenrodgersyana economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol
AT moorebrittany economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol