Cargando…
Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a common feature of people’s reproductive lives. However, the economic implications of abortion and policies affecting abortion provision are poorly understood. This scoping review aims to systematically review social science literature for studies that have investigated th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029939 |
_version_ | 1783441000391245824 |
---|---|
author | Coast, Ernestina Lattof, Samantha R van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana Moore, Brittany |
author_facet | Coast, Ernestina Lattof, Samantha R van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana Moore, Brittany |
author_sort | Coast, Ernestina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a common feature of people’s reproductive lives. However, the economic implications of abortion and policies affecting abortion provision are poorly understood. This scoping review aims to systematically review social science literature for studies that have investigated the impact of abortion care (ie, un/safe abortion, post-abortion care) or abortion policies on economic outcomes at the micro-levels (ie, abortion seekers and their households), meso-levels (ie, communities and health systems) and macro-levels (ie, societies and nation states). Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline for protocols, this protocol details the scoping review’s methodological and analytical approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will utilise the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region will be considered. For inclusion, studies must examine one of the following economic outcomes at the micro-levels, meso-levels and/or macro-levels: costs, benefits, impacts and/or value of abortion care or abortion policies. Searches will be conducted in eight electronic databases. We will conduct the searches and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria according to the PRISMA-ScR flow approach. No assessments of items’ quality will be made, as the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and describe the coverage of the evidence. After extracting all data, we will inductively develop an economic framework around the economics of abortion. The analysis will synthesise the evidence base and identify knowledge gaps on the costs and benefits of abortion to stakeholders at various levels. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and condensed summaries for key stakeholders and partners in the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6678010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66780102019-08-16 Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol Coast, Ernestina Lattof, Samantha R van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana Moore, Brittany BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a common feature of people’s reproductive lives. However, the economic implications of abortion and policies affecting abortion provision are poorly understood. This scoping review aims to systematically review social science literature for studies that have investigated the impact of abortion care (ie, un/safe abortion, post-abortion care) or abortion policies on economic outcomes at the micro-levels (ie, abortion seekers and their households), meso-levels (ie, communities and health systems) and macro-levels (ie, societies and nation states). Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline for protocols, this protocol details the scoping review’s methodological and analytical approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will utilise the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region will be considered. For inclusion, studies must examine one of the following economic outcomes at the micro-levels, meso-levels and/or macro-levels: costs, benefits, impacts and/or value of abortion care or abortion policies. Searches will be conducted in eight electronic databases. We will conduct the searches and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria according to the PRISMA-ScR flow approach. No assessments of items’ quality will be made, as the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and describe the coverage of the evidence. After extracting all data, we will inductively develop an economic framework around the economics of abortion. The analysis will synthesise the evidence base and identify knowledge gaps on the costs and benefits of abortion to stakeholders at various levels. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and condensed summaries for key stakeholders and partners in the field. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6678010/ /pubmed/31366662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029939 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Medicine Coast, Ernestina Lattof, Samantha R van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana Moore, Brittany Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol |
title | Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31366662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coasternestina economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol AT lattofsamanthar economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol AT vandermeulenrodgersyana economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol AT moorebrittany economicsofabortionascopingreviewprotocol |