Cargando…

Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England

OBJECTIVES: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities, using maternal educational attainment, maternal and partner employment status, and lone motherhood indicators, in the risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births, their time trend, potential mediation by maternal smoking and body mass index,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilding, Sam, Ziauddeen, Nida, Roderick, Paul, Smith, Dianna, Chase, Debbie, Macklon, Nick, McGrath, Nuala, Hanson, Mark, Alwan, Nisreen A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026998
_version_ 1783441012890271744
author Wilding, Sam
Ziauddeen, Nida
Roderick, Paul
Smith, Dianna
Chase, Debbie
Macklon, Nick
McGrath, Nuala
Hanson, Mark
Alwan, Nisreen A
author_facet Wilding, Sam
Ziauddeen, Nida
Roderick, Paul
Smith, Dianna
Chase, Debbie
Macklon, Nick
McGrath, Nuala
Hanson, Mark
Alwan, Nisreen A
author_sort Wilding, Sam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities, using maternal educational attainment, maternal and partner employment status, and lone motherhood indicators, in the risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births, their time trend, potential mediation by maternal smoking and body mass index, and effect modification by parity. DESIGN: Population-based birth cohort using routine antenatal healthcare data. SETTING: Babies born at University Hospital Southampton, UK, between 2004 and 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 65 909 singleton live births born to mothers aged ≥18 years between 24-week and 42-week gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SGA (birth weight <10th percentile for others born at the same number of completed weeks compared with 2013/2014 within England and Wales). RESULTS: Babies born to mothers educated up to secondary school level (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.32, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.47), who were unemployed (aOR 1.27, 99% CI 1.16 to 1.38) or with unemployed partners (aOR 1.27, 99% CI 1.13 to 1.43), were at greater risk of being SGA. There was no statistically significant change in the magnitude of this risk difference by these indicators over time between 2004 and 2016, as estimated by linear interactions with year of birth. Babies born to lone mothers were not at higher risk compared with partnered mothers after adjusting for maternal smoking (aOR 1.05, 99% CI 0.93 to 1.20). The inverse association between maternal educational attainment and SGA risk appeared greater in multiparous (aOR 1.40, 99% CI 1.10 to 1.77) compared with primiparous women (aOR 1.28, 99% CI 1.12 to 1.47), and the reverse was true for maternal and partner’s unemployment where the association was stronger in primiparous women. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in SGA risk by educational attainment and employment status are not narrowing over time, with differences in association strength by parity. The greater SGA risk in lone mothers was potentially explained by maternal smoking. Preventive interventions should target socially disadvantaged women, including preconception and postpartum smoking cessation to reduce SGA risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6678068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66780682019-08-16 Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England Wilding, Sam Ziauddeen, Nida Roderick, Paul Smith, Dianna Chase, Debbie Macklon, Nick McGrath, Nuala Hanson, Mark Alwan, Nisreen A BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities, using maternal educational attainment, maternal and partner employment status, and lone motherhood indicators, in the risk of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births, their time trend, potential mediation by maternal smoking and body mass index, and effect modification by parity. DESIGN: Population-based birth cohort using routine antenatal healthcare data. SETTING: Babies born at University Hospital Southampton, UK, between 2004 and 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 65 909 singleton live births born to mothers aged ≥18 years between 24-week and 42-week gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SGA (birth weight <10th percentile for others born at the same number of completed weeks compared with 2013/2014 within England and Wales). RESULTS: Babies born to mothers educated up to secondary school level (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.32, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.47), who were unemployed (aOR 1.27, 99% CI 1.16 to 1.38) or with unemployed partners (aOR 1.27, 99% CI 1.13 to 1.43), were at greater risk of being SGA. There was no statistically significant change in the magnitude of this risk difference by these indicators over time between 2004 and 2016, as estimated by linear interactions with year of birth. Babies born to lone mothers were not at higher risk compared with partnered mothers after adjusting for maternal smoking (aOR 1.05, 99% CI 0.93 to 1.20). The inverse association between maternal educational attainment and SGA risk appeared greater in multiparous (aOR 1.40, 99% CI 1.10 to 1.77) compared with primiparous women (aOR 1.28, 99% CI 1.12 to 1.47), and the reverse was true for maternal and partner’s unemployment where the association was stronger in primiparous women. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in SGA risk by educational attainment and employment status are not narrowing over time, with differences in association strength by parity. The greater SGA risk in lone mothers was potentially explained by maternal smoking. Preventive interventions should target socially disadvantaged women, including preconception and postpartum smoking cessation to reduce SGA risk. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6678068/ /pubmed/31362961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026998 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Wilding, Sam
Ziauddeen, Nida
Roderick, Paul
Smith, Dianna
Chase, Debbie
Macklon, Nick
McGrath, Nuala
Hanson, Mark
Alwan, Nisreen A
Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England
title Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England
title_full Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England
title_fullStr Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England
title_full_unstemmed Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England
title_short Are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? Findings from a population-based cohort in the South of England
title_sort are socioeconomic inequalities in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age birth narrowing? findings from a population-based cohort in the south of england
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026998
work_keys_str_mv AT wildingsam aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT ziauddeennida aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT roderickpaul aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT smithdianna aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT chasedebbie aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT macklonnick aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT mcgrathnuala aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT hansonmark aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland
AT alwannisreena aresocioeconomicinequalitiesintheincidenceofsmallforgestationalagebirthnarrowingfindingsfromapopulationbasedcohortinthesouthofengland