Cargando…

Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis

This study aimed to find out which countries around the world require psychosocial hazards and workplace violence to be assessed by employers through a mandatory occupational risk assessment process and to compare the type of legislation between countries. We systematically searched the Internationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chirico, Francesco, Heponiemi, Tarja, Pavlova, Milena, Zaffina, Salvatore, Magnavita, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31336707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142470
_version_ 1783441037725794304
author Chirico, Francesco
Heponiemi, Tarja
Pavlova, Milena
Zaffina, Salvatore
Magnavita, Nicola
author_facet Chirico, Francesco
Heponiemi, Tarja
Pavlova, Milena
Zaffina, Salvatore
Magnavita, Nicola
author_sort Chirico, Francesco
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to find out which countries around the world require psychosocial hazards and workplace violence to be assessed by employers through a mandatory occupational risk assessment process and to compare the type of legislation between countries. We systematically searched the International Labour Office (ILO) “LEGOSH” database for documents published during the period between December 2017 and February 2018. The search included 132 countries, of which 23 were considered as developed and 109 as developing according to the United Nations. Our review showed that most countries (85, i.e., 64%) have not included mandatory psychosocial risk assessment and prevention in their national occupational safety and health legislation. Moreover, we found differences between developed and developing countries, showing that developed countries more frequently have legislative measures. Within developed countries, we also found differences between countries following the Scandinavian model of workplace health and safety culture and other countries. Moreover, in many countries, workplace violence was prohibited only if it involves an offence to moral or religious customs. In conclusion, the marked difference in psychosocial hazards and workplace violence regulations among countries leads to unequal levels of workers’ protection, with adverse effects on global health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6678173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66781732019-08-19 Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis Chirico, Francesco Heponiemi, Tarja Pavlova, Milena Zaffina, Salvatore Magnavita, Nicola Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study aimed to find out which countries around the world require psychosocial hazards and workplace violence to be assessed by employers through a mandatory occupational risk assessment process and to compare the type of legislation between countries. We systematically searched the International Labour Office (ILO) “LEGOSH” database for documents published during the period between December 2017 and February 2018. The search included 132 countries, of which 23 were considered as developed and 109 as developing according to the United Nations. Our review showed that most countries (85, i.e., 64%) have not included mandatory psychosocial risk assessment and prevention in their national occupational safety and health legislation. Moreover, we found differences between developed and developing countries, showing that developed countries more frequently have legislative measures. Within developed countries, we also found differences between countries following the Scandinavian model of workplace health and safety culture and other countries. Moreover, in many countries, workplace violence was prohibited only if it involves an offence to moral or religious customs. In conclusion, the marked difference in psychosocial hazards and workplace violence regulations among countries leads to unequal levels of workers’ protection, with adverse effects on global health. MDPI 2019-07-11 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6678173/ /pubmed/31336707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142470 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chirico, Francesco
Heponiemi, Tarja
Pavlova, Milena
Zaffina, Salvatore
Magnavita, Nicola
Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis
title Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis
title_full Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis
title_fullStr Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis
title_short Psychosocial Risk Prevention in a Global Occupational Health Perspective. A Descriptive Analysis
title_sort psychosocial risk prevention in a global occupational health perspective. a descriptive analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31336707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142470
work_keys_str_mv AT chiricofrancesco psychosocialriskpreventioninaglobaloccupationalhealthperspectiveadescriptiveanalysis
AT heponiemitarja psychosocialriskpreventioninaglobaloccupationalhealthperspectiveadescriptiveanalysis
AT pavlovamilena psychosocialriskpreventioninaglobaloccupationalhealthperspectiveadescriptiveanalysis
AT zaffinasalvatore psychosocialriskpreventioninaglobaloccupationalhealthperspectiveadescriptiveanalysis
AT magnavitanicola psychosocialriskpreventioninaglobaloccupationalhealthperspectiveadescriptiveanalysis