Cargando…

Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment

Pain during, and especially after, cancer remains underestimated and undertreated. Moreover, both patients and health care providers are not aware of potential benefits of rehabilitation strategies for the management of pain during and following cancer treatment. In this paper, we firstly provided a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Groef, An, Penen, Frauke, Dams, Lore, Van der Gucht, Elien, Nijs, Jo, Meeus, Mira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31284377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070979
_version_ 1783441096059125760
author De Groef, An
Penen, Frauke
Dams, Lore
Van der Gucht, Elien
Nijs, Jo
Meeus, Mira
author_facet De Groef, An
Penen, Frauke
Dams, Lore
Van der Gucht, Elien
Nijs, Jo
Meeus, Mira
author_sort De Groef, An
collection PubMed
description Pain during, and especially after, cancer remains underestimated and undertreated. Moreover, both patients and health care providers are not aware of potential benefits of rehabilitation strategies for the management of pain during and following cancer treatment. In this paper, we firstly provided a state-of-the-art overview of the best evidence rehabilitation modalities for patients having (persistent) pain during and following cancer treatment, including educational interventions, specific exercise therapies, manual therapies, general exercise therapies and mind-body exercise therapies. Secondly, the findings were summarized from a clinical perspective and discussed from a scientific perspective. In conclusion, best evidence suggests that general exercise therapy has small pain-relieving effects. Supporting evidence for mind-body exercise therapy is available only in breast cancer patients. At this moment, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the use of specific exercises and manual therapy at the affected region for pain relief during and after cancer treatment. No clinically relevant results were found in favor of educational interventions restricted to a biomedical approach of pain. To increase available evidence these rehabilitation modalities should be applied according to, and within, a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial pain management approach. Larger, well-designed clinical trials tailored to the origin of pain and with proper evaluation of pain-related functioning and the patient’s pain experience are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6678417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66784172019-08-19 Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment De Groef, An Penen, Frauke Dams, Lore Van der Gucht, Elien Nijs, Jo Meeus, Mira J Clin Med Review Pain during, and especially after, cancer remains underestimated and undertreated. Moreover, both patients and health care providers are not aware of potential benefits of rehabilitation strategies for the management of pain during and following cancer treatment. In this paper, we firstly provided a state-of-the-art overview of the best evidence rehabilitation modalities for patients having (persistent) pain during and following cancer treatment, including educational interventions, specific exercise therapies, manual therapies, general exercise therapies and mind-body exercise therapies. Secondly, the findings were summarized from a clinical perspective and discussed from a scientific perspective. In conclusion, best evidence suggests that general exercise therapy has small pain-relieving effects. Supporting evidence for mind-body exercise therapy is available only in breast cancer patients. At this moment, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the use of specific exercises and manual therapy at the affected region for pain relief during and after cancer treatment. No clinically relevant results were found in favor of educational interventions restricted to a biomedical approach of pain. To increase available evidence these rehabilitation modalities should be applied according to, and within, a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial pain management approach. Larger, well-designed clinical trials tailored to the origin of pain and with proper evaluation of pain-related functioning and the patient’s pain experience are needed. MDPI 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6678417/ /pubmed/31284377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070979 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
De Groef, An
Penen, Frauke
Dams, Lore
Van der Gucht, Elien
Nijs, Jo
Meeus, Mira
Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment
title Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment
title_full Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment
title_fullStr Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment
title_short Best-Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 2: Pain during and after Cancer Treatment
title_sort best-evidence rehabilitation for chronic pain part 2: pain during and after cancer treatment
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31284377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070979
work_keys_str_mv AT degroefan bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart2painduringandaftercancertreatment
AT penenfrauke bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart2painduringandaftercancertreatment
AT damslore bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart2painduringandaftercancertreatment
AT vanderguchtelien bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart2painduringandaftercancertreatment
AT nijsjo bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart2painduringandaftercancertreatment
AT meeusmira bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart2painduringandaftercancertreatment