Cargando…

Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods

Myopia in children has dramatically increased worldwide. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of outdoor light exposure on myopia. According to research data from 13 studies of 15,081 children aged 4–14 at baseline, outdoor light exposure significantly reduced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Ciao-Lin, Wu, Wei-Fong, Liou, Yiing Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142595
_version_ 1783441116946759680
author Ho, Ciao-Lin
Wu, Wei-Fong
Liou, Yiing Mei
author_facet Ho, Ciao-Lin
Wu, Wei-Fong
Liou, Yiing Mei
author_sort Ho, Ciao-Lin
collection PubMed
description Myopia in children has dramatically increased worldwide. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of outdoor light exposure on myopia. According to research data from 13 studies of 15,081 children aged 4–14 at baseline, outdoor light exposure significantly reduced myopia incidence/prevalence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80–0.91, p < 0.00001; I2 = 90%), spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) by 0.15 D/year (0.09–0.27, p < 0.0001), and axial elongation by 0.08 mm/year (−0.14 to −0.02, p = 0.02). The benefits of outdoor light exposure intervention, according to pooled overall results, included decreases in three myopia indicators: 50% in myopia incidence, 32.9% in SER, and 24.9% in axial elongation for individuals in Asia. Daily outdoor light exposure of more than 120 min was the most effective intervention, and weekly intervention time exhibited a dose–response relationship with all three indicators. Subgroup comparisons revealed that interventional studies report greater benefits from outdoor light exposure compared with cohort and cross-sectional studies, and individuals with myopia in intervention studies experienced slightly greater benefits than individuals without, in terms of SER and axial elongation. Therefore, this study suggests 120 min/day of outdoor light exposure at school.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6678505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66785052019-08-19 Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods Ho, Ciao-Lin Wu, Wei-Fong Liou, Yiing Mei Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Myopia in children has dramatically increased worldwide. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of outdoor light exposure on myopia. According to research data from 13 studies of 15,081 children aged 4–14 at baseline, outdoor light exposure significantly reduced myopia incidence/prevalence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80–0.91, p < 0.00001; I2 = 90%), spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) by 0.15 D/year (0.09–0.27, p < 0.0001), and axial elongation by 0.08 mm/year (−0.14 to −0.02, p = 0.02). The benefits of outdoor light exposure intervention, according to pooled overall results, included decreases in three myopia indicators: 50% in myopia incidence, 32.9% in SER, and 24.9% in axial elongation for individuals in Asia. Daily outdoor light exposure of more than 120 min was the most effective intervention, and weekly intervention time exhibited a dose–response relationship with all three indicators. Subgroup comparisons revealed that interventional studies report greater benefits from outdoor light exposure compared with cohort and cross-sectional studies, and individuals with myopia in intervention studies experienced slightly greater benefits than individuals without, in terms of SER and axial elongation. Therefore, this study suggests 120 min/day of outdoor light exposure at school. MDPI 2019-07-21 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6678505/ /pubmed/31330865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142595 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ho, Ciao-Lin
Wu, Wei-Fong
Liou, Yiing Mei
Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods
title Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods
title_full Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods
title_fullStr Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods
title_full_unstemmed Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods
title_short Dose–Response Relationship of Outdoor Exposure and Myopia Indicators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Various Research Methods
title_sort dose–response relationship of outdoor exposure and myopia indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of various research methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142595
work_keys_str_mv AT hociaolin doseresponserelationshipofoutdoorexposureandmyopiaindicatorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvariousresearchmethods
AT wuweifong doseresponserelationshipofoutdoorexposureandmyopiaindicatorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvariousresearchmethods
AT liouyiingmei doseresponserelationshipofoutdoorexposureandmyopiaindicatorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofvariousresearchmethods