Cargando…

Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study

Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unable to exercise at high intensities for sufficiently long periods of time to obtain true physiological training effects. It therefore appears sensible to increase training duration at sub-maximal exercise intensities to optimiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paneroni, Mara, Vogiatzis, Ioannis, Belli, Stefano, Savio, Gloria, Visca, Dina, Zampogna, Elisabetta, Aliani, Maria, De Carolis, Vito, Maniscalco, Mauro, Simonelli, Carla, Vitacca, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31323895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071052
_version_ 1783441152602537984
author Paneroni, Mara
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Belli, Stefano
Savio, Gloria
Visca, Dina
Zampogna, Elisabetta
Aliani, Maria
De Carolis, Vito
Maniscalco, Mauro
Simonelli, Carla
Vitacca, Michele
author_facet Paneroni, Mara
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Belli, Stefano
Savio, Gloria
Visca, Dina
Zampogna, Elisabetta
Aliani, Maria
De Carolis, Vito
Maniscalco, Mauro
Simonelli, Carla
Vitacca, Michele
author_sort Paneroni, Mara
collection PubMed
description Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unable to exercise at high intensities for sufficiently long periods of time to obtain true physiological training effects. It therefore appears sensible to increase training duration at sub-maximal exercise intensities to optimize the benefit of exercise training. We compared the effects on exercise tolerance of two endurance cycloergometer submaximal exercise protocols with different cumulative training loads (one (G1) versus two (G2) daily 40 min training sessions) both implemented over 20 consecutive days in 149 patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV(1)): 39% predicted) admitted to an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. Patients in G2 exhibited greater improvement (p = 0.011) in submaximal endurance time (from 258 (197) to 741 (662) sec) compared to G1 (from 303 (237) to 530 (555) sec). Clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life, 6MWT, and chronic dyspnea were not different between groups. Doubling the volume of endurance training is feasible and can lead to an additional benefit on exercise tolerance. Future studies may investigate the applicability and benefits of this training strategy in the outpatient or community-based pulmonary rehabilitation settings to amplify the benefits of exercise interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6678655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66786552019-08-19 Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study Paneroni, Mara Vogiatzis, Ioannis Belli, Stefano Savio, Gloria Visca, Dina Zampogna, Elisabetta Aliani, Maria De Carolis, Vito Maniscalco, Mauro Simonelli, Carla Vitacca, Michele J Clin Med Article Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are unable to exercise at high intensities for sufficiently long periods of time to obtain true physiological training effects. It therefore appears sensible to increase training duration at sub-maximal exercise intensities to optimize the benefit of exercise training. We compared the effects on exercise tolerance of two endurance cycloergometer submaximal exercise protocols with different cumulative training loads (one (G1) versus two (G2) daily 40 min training sessions) both implemented over 20 consecutive days in 149 patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV(1)): 39% predicted) admitted to an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. Patients in G2 exhibited greater improvement (p = 0.011) in submaximal endurance time (from 258 (197) to 741 (662) sec) compared to G1 (from 303 (237) to 530 (555) sec). Clinically meaningful improvements in health-related quality of life, 6MWT, and chronic dyspnea were not different between groups. Doubling the volume of endurance training is feasible and can lead to an additional benefit on exercise tolerance. Future studies may investigate the applicability and benefits of this training strategy in the outpatient or community-based pulmonary rehabilitation settings to amplify the benefits of exercise interventions. MDPI 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6678655/ /pubmed/31323895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071052 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paneroni, Mara
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Belli, Stefano
Savio, Gloria
Visca, Dina
Zampogna, Elisabetta
Aliani, Maria
De Carolis, Vito
Maniscalco, Mauro
Simonelli, Carla
Vitacca, Michele
Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study
title Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Is Two Better Than One? The Impact of Doubling Training Volume in Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort is two better than one? the impact of doubling training volume in severe copd: a randomized controlled study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31323895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071052
work_keys_str_mv AT paneronimara istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT vogiatzisioannis istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT bellistefano istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT saviogloria istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT viscadina istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zampognaelisabetta istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT alianimaria istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT decarolisvito istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT maniscalcomauro istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT simonellicarla istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT vitaccamichele istwobetterthanonetheimpactofdoublingtrainingvolumeinseverecopdarandomizedcontrolledstudy