Cargando…

A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science

The translation of research into tangible health benefits via changes to urban planning policy and practice is a key intended outcome of academic active-living research endeavours. Conversely, policy-makers and planners identify the need for policy-specific evidence to ensure policy decisions and pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hooper, Paula, Foster, Sarah, Giles-Corti, Billie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31295823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142448
_version_ 1783441175357685760
author Hooper, Paula
Foster, Sarah
Giles-Corti, Billie
author_facet Hooper, Paula
Foster, Sarah
Giles-Corti, Billie
author_sort Hooper, Paula
collection PubMed
description The translation of research into tangible health benefits via changes to urban planning policy and practice is a key intended outcome of academic active-living research endeavours. Conversely, policy-makers and planners identify the need for policy-specific evidence to ensure policy decisions and practices are informed and validated by rigorously established evidence. In practice, however, these two aspirations rarely meet and a research-translation gap remains. The RESIDE project is a unique longitudinal natural experiment designed to evaluate the health impacts of the ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ planning policy, which was introduced by the Western Australian Government to create more walkable suburbs. This commentary provides an overview and discussion of the policy-specific study methodologies undertaken to quantitatively assess the implementation of the policy and assess its active living and health impacts. It outlines the key research-translation successes and impact of the findings on the Liveable Neighbourhoods policy and discusses lessons learnt from the RESIDE project to inform future natural experiments of policy evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6678749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66787492019-08-19 A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science Hooper, Paula Foster, Sarah Giles-Corti, Billie Int J Environ Res Public Health Commentary The translation of research into tangible health benefits via changes to urban planning policy and practice is a key intended outcome of academic active-living research endeavours. Conversely, policy-makers and planners identify the need for policy-specific evidence to ensure policy decisions and practices are informed and validated by rigorously established evidence. In practice, however, these two aspirations rarely meet and a research-translation gap remains. The RESIDE project is a unique longitudinal natural experiment designed to evaluate the health impacts of the ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ planning policy, which was introduced by the Western Australian Government to create more walkable suburbs. This commentary provides an overview and discussion of the policy-specific study methodologies undertaken to quantitatively assess the implementation of the policy and assess its active living and health impacts. It outlines the key research-translation successes and impact of the findings on the Liveable Neighbourhoods policy and discusses lessons learnt from the RESIDE project to inform future natural experiments of policy evaluation. MDPI 2019-07-10 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6678749/ /pubmed/31295823 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142448 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Hooper, Paula
Foster, Sarah
Giles-Corti, Billie
A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science
title A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science
title_full A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science
title_fullStr A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science
title_full_unstemmed A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science
title_short A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science
title_sort case study of a natural experiment bridging the ‘research into policy’ and ‘evidence-based policy’ gap for active-living science
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31295823
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142448
work_keys_str_mv AT hooperpaula acasestudyofanaturalexperimentbridgingtheresearchintopolicyandevidencebasedpolicygapforactivelivingscience
AT fostersarah acasestudyofanaturalexperimentbridgingtheresearchintopolicyandevidencebasedpolicygapforactivelivingscience
AT gilescortibillie acasestudyofanaturalexperimentbridgingtheresearchintopolicyandevidencebasedpolicygapforactivelivingscience
AT hooperpaula casestudyofanaturalexperimentbridgingtheresearchintopolicyandevidencebasedpolicygapforactivelivingscience
AT fostersarah casestudyofanaturalexperimentbridgingtheresearchintopolicyandevidencebasedpolicygapforactivelivingscience
AT gilescortibillie casestudyofanaturalexperimentbridgingtheresearchintopolicyandevidencebasedpolicygapforactivelivingscience