Cargando…

Epidermal Growth Factor is Effective in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are one the common complications of diabetes mellitus. Many trials were performed to evaluate the effect of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) in healing DFUs. This meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the evidence of rhEGF treatment in DFUs in compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bui, Thien Quoc, Bui, Quoc Van Phu, Németh, Dávid, Hegyi, Péter, Szakács, Zsolt, Rumbus, Zoltán, Tóth, Barbara, Emri, Gabriella, Párniczky, Andrea, Sarlós, Patricia, Varga, Orsolya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6678975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142584
Descripción
Sumario:Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are one the common complications of diabetes mellitus. Many trials were performed to evaluate the effect of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) in healing DFUs. This meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the evidence of rhEGF treatment in DFUs in comparison to placebo. Databases included for the search were PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, and Scopus (up to January 2019). The outcome of interest was the complete healing rate of DFUs. We performed random effects meta-analysis stratified by the types of administration route (intralesional injection and topical apply) by calculating the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of six studies involving 530 patients were eligible for analysis. The combined OR (intralesional injection and topical apply) was 4.005 (95% CI: (2.248; 7.135), p < 0.001). The ORs for intralesional injection and topical application were 3.599 (95% CI: (1.213; 10.677), p = 0.021) and 4.176 (95% CI: (2.112; 8.256), p < 0.001), respectively. Statistical heterogeneity might not be important in overall treatment (I(2) = 15.17, p = 0.317) and both of the subgroups (I(2): 24.56, p = 0.25 and I(2): 33.26, p = 0.213, respectively). Our results support the use of rhEGF in the treatment of DFUs.