Cargando…

Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database

The number of entries in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) has doubled in the last decade, and it has increased tenfold in the last twenty years. The availability of an ever-growing number of structures is having a huge impact on the Structure-Based Drug Discovery (SBDD), allowing investigation of new tar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolcato, Giovanni, Cuzzolin, Alberto, Bissaro, Maicol, Moro, Stefano, Sturlese, Mattia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143558
_version_ 1783441246251909120
author Bolcato, Giovanni
Cuzzolin, Alberto
Bissaro, Maicol
Moro, Stefano
Sturlese, Mattia
author_facet Bolcato, Giovanni
Cuzzolin, Alberto
Bissaro, Maicol
Moro, Stefano
Sturlese, Mattia
author_sort Bolcato, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description The number of entries in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) has doubled in the last decade, and it has increased tenfold in the last twenty years. The availability of an ever-growing number of structures is having a huge impact on the Structure-Based Drug Discovery (SBDD), allowing investigation of new targets and giving the possibility to have multiple structures of the same macromolecule in a complex with different ligands. Such a large resource often implies the choice of the most suitable complex for molecular docking calculation, and this task is complicated by the plethora of possible posing and scoring function algorithms available, which may influence the quality of the outcomes. Here, we report a large benchmark performed on the PDBbind database containing more than four thousand entries and seventeen popular docking protocols. We found that, even in protein families wherein docking protocols generally showed acceptable results, certain ligand-protein complexes are poorly reproduced in the self-docking procedure. Such a trend in certain protein families is more pronounced, and this underlines the importance in identification of a suitable protein–ligand conformation coupled to a well-performing docking protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6679043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66790432019-08-19 Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database Bolcato, Giovanni Cuzzolin, Alberto Bissaro, Maicol Moro, Stefano Sturlese, Mattia Int J Mol Sci Article The number of entries in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) has doubled in the last decade, and it has increased tenfold in the last twenty years. The availability of an ever-growing number of structures is having a huge impact on the Structure-Based Drug Discovery (SBDD), allowing investigation of new targets and giving the possibility to have multiple structures of the same macromolecule in a complex with different ligands. Such a large resource often implies the choice of the most suitable complex for molecular docking calculation, and this task is complicated by the plethora of possible posing and scoring function algorithms available, which may influence the quality of the outcomes. Here, we report a large benchmark performed on the PDBbind database containing more than four thousand entries and seventeen popular docking protocols. We found that, even in protein families wherein docking protocols generally showed acceptable results, certain ligand-protein complexes are poorly reproduced in the self-docking procedure. Such a trend in certain protein families is more pronounced, and this underlines the importance in identification of a suitable protein–ligand conformation coupled to a well-performing docking protocol. MDPI 2019-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6679043/ /pubmed/31330841 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143558 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bolcato, Giovanni
Cuzzolin, Alberto
Bissaro, Maicol
Moro, Stefano
Sturlese, Mattia
Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database
title Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database
title_full Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database
title_fullStr Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database
title_full_unstemmed Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database
title_short Can We Still Trust Docking Results? An Extension of the Applicability of DockBench on PDBbind Database
title_sort can we still trust docking results? an extension of the applicability of dockbench on pdbbind database
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330841
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143558
work_keys_str_mv AT bolcatogiovanni canwestilltrustdockingresultsanextensionoftheapplicabilityofdockbenchonpdbbinddatabase
AT cuzzolinalberto canwestilltrustdockingresultsanextensionoftheapplicabilityofdockbenchonpdbbinddatabase
AT bissaromaicol canwestilltrustdockingresultsanextensionoftheapplicabilityofdockbenchonpdbbinddatabase
AT morostefano canwestilltrustdockingresultsanextensionoftheapplicabilityofdockbenchonpdbbinddatabase
AT sturlesemattia canwestilltrustdockingresultsanextensionoftheapplicabilityofdockbenchonpdbbinddatabase