Cargando…
Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is a major and highly prevalent health problem. Given the high number of papers available, clinicians might be overwhelmed by the evidence on CLBP management. Taking into account the scale and costs of CLBP, it is imperative that healthcare professionals have access to u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071063 |
_version_ | 1783441249842233344 |
---|---|
author | Malfliet, Anneleen Ickmans, Kelly Huysmans, Eva Coppieters, Iris Willaert, Ward Van Bogaert, Wouter Rheel, Emma Bilterys, Thomas Van Wilgen, Paul Nijs, Jo |
author_facet | Malfliet, Anneleen Ickmans, Kelly Huysmans, Eva Coppieters, Iris Willaert, Ward Van Bogaert, Wouter Rheel, Emma Bilterys, Thomas Van Wilgen, Paul Nijs, Jo |
author_sort | Malfliet, Anneleen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is a major and highly prevalent health problem. Given the high number of papers available, clinicians might be overwhelmed by the evidence on CLBP management. Taking into account the scale and costs of CLBP, it is imperative that healthcare professionals have access to up-to-date, evidence-based information to assist them in treatment decision-making. Therefore, this paper provides a state-of-the-art overview of the best evidence non-invasive rehabilitation for CLBP. Taking together up-to-date evidence from systematic reviews, meta-analysis and available treatment guidelines, most physically inactive therapies should not be considered for CLBP management, except for pain neuroscience education and spinal manipulative therapy if combined with exercise therapy, with or without psychological therapy. Regarding active therapy, back schools, sensory discrimination training, proprioceptive exercises, and sling exercises should not be considered due to low-quality and/or conflicting evidence. Exercise interventions on the other hand are recommended, but while all exercise modalities appear effective compared to minimal/passive/conservative/no intervention, there is no evidence that some specific types of exercises are superior to others. Therefore, we recommend choosing exercises in line with the patient’s preferences and abilities. When exercise interventions are combined with a psychological component, effects are better and maintain longer over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6679058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66790582019-08-19 Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain Malfliet, Anneleen Ickmans, Kelly Huysmans, Eva Coppieters, Iris Willaert, Ward Van Bogaert, Wouter Rheel, Emma Bilterys, Thomas Van Wilgen, Paul Nijs, Jo J Clin Med Article Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is a major and highly prevalent health problem. Given the high number of papers available, clinicians might be overwhelmed by the evidence on CLBP management. Taking into account the scale and costs of CLBP, it is imperative that healthcare professionals have access to up-to-date, evidence-based information to assist them in treatment decision-making. Therefore, this paper provides a state-of-the-art overview of the best evidence non-invasive rehabilitation for CLBP. Taking together up-to-date evidence from systematic reviews, meta-analysis and available treatment guidelines, most physically inactive therapies should not be considered for CLBP management, except for pain neuroscience education and spinal manipulative therapy if combined with exercise therapy, with or without psychological therapy. Regarding active therapy, back schools, sensory discrimination training, proprioceptive exercises, and sling exercises should not be considered due to low-quality and/or conflicting evidence. Exercise interventions on the other hand are recommended, but while all exercise modalities appear effective compared to minimal/passive/conservative/no intervention, there is no evidence that some specific types of exercises are superior to others. Therefore, we recommend choosing exercises in line with the patient’s preferences and abilities. When exercise interventions are combined with a psychological component, effects are better and maintain longer over time. MDPI 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6679058/ /pubmed/31331087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071063 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Malfliet, Anneleen Ickmans, Kelly Huysmans, Eva Coppieters, Iris Willaert, Ward Van Bogaert, Wouter Rheel, Emma Bilterys, Thomas Van Wilgen, Paul Nijs, Jo Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain |
title | Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain |
title_full | Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain |
title_fullStr | Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain |
title_short | Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 3: Low Back Pain |
title_sort | best evidence rehabilitation for chronic pain part 3: low back pain |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malflietanneleen bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT ickmanskelly bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT huysmanseva bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT coppietersiris bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT willaertward bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT vanbogaertwouter bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT rheelemma bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT bilterysthomas bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT vanwilgenpaul bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain AT nijsjo bestevidencerehabilitationforchronicpainpart3lowbackpain |