Cargando…

Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling

In biomechanics and orthopedics, finite element modelling allows simulating complex problems, and in the last few years, it has been widely used in many applications, also in the field of biomechanics and biotribology. As is known, one crucial point of FEM (finite element model) is the discretizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruggiero, Alessandro, D’Amato, Roberto, Affatato, Saverio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12142332
_version_ 1783441272867913728
author Ruggiero, Alessandro
D’Amato, Roberto
Affatato, Saverio
author_facet Ruggiero, Alessandro
D’Amato, Roberto
Affatato, Saverio
author_sort Ruggiero, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description In biomechanics and orthopedics, finite element modelling allows simulating complex problems, and in the last few years, it has been widely used in many applications, also in the field of biomechanics and biotribology. As is known, one crucial point of FEM (finite element model) is the discretization of the physical domain, and this procedure is called meshing. A well-designed mesh is necessary in order to achieve accurate results with an acceptable computational effort. The aim of this work is to test a finite element model to simulate the dry frictionless contact conditions of a hip joint prosthesis (a femoral head against an acetabular cup) in a soft bearing configuration by comparing the performances of 12 common meshing strategies. In the simulations, total deformation of the internal surface of the cup, contact pressure, and the equivalent von Mises stress are evaluated by using loads and kinematic conditions during a typical gait, obtained from a previous work using a musculoskeletal multibody model. Moreover, accounting for appropriate mesh quality metrics, the results are discussed, underlining the best choice we identified after the large amount of numerical simulations performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6679155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66791552019-08-19 Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling Ruggiero, Alessandro D’Amato, Roberto Affatato, Saverio Materials (Basel) Article In biomechanics and orthopedics, finite element modelling allows simulating complex problems, and in the last few years, it has been widely used in many applications, also in the field of biomechanics and biotribology. As is known, one crucial point of FEM (finite element model) is the discretization of the physical domain, and this procedure is called meshing. A well-designed mesh is necessary in order to achieve accurate results with an acceptable computational effort. The aim of this work is to test a finite element model to simulate the dry frictionless contact conditions of a hip joint prosthesis (a femoral head against an acetabular cup) in a soft bearing configuration by comparing the performances of 12 common meshing strategies. In the simulations, total deformation of the internal surface of the cup, contact pressure, and the equivalent von Mises stress are evaluated by using loads and kinematic conditions during a typical gait, obtained from a previous work using a musculoskeletal multibody model. Moreover, accounting for appropriate mesh quality metrics, the results are discussed, underlining the best choice we identified after the large amount of numerical simulations performed. MDPI 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6679155/ /pubmed/31340439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12142332 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ruggiero, Alessandro
D’Amato, Roberto
Affatato, Saverio
Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling
title Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling
title_full Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling
title_fullStr Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling
title_short Comparison of Meshing Strategies in THR Finite Element Modelling
title_sort comparison of meshing strategies in thr finite element modelling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12142332
work_keys_str_mv AT ruggieroalessandro comparisonofmeshingstrategiesinthrfiniteelementmodelling
AT damatoroberto comparisonofmeshingstrategiesinthrfiniteelementmodelling
AT affatatosaverio comparisonofmeshingstrategiesinthrfiniteelementmodelling