Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine

BACKGROUND: Patient package inserts (PPIs) should provide accurate, sufficient, and clear information for patients as well as health care professionals. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the PPIs of local and imported anti-diabetic agents in the Palestinian market. METHODS: Eighteen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eshtayeh, Malak, Draghmeh, Asia, Zyoud, Sa’ed H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7379-8
_version_ 1783441343421349888
author Eshtayeh, Malak
Draghmeh, Asia
Zyoud, Sa’ed H.
author_facet Eshtayeh, Malak
Draghmeh, Asia
Zyoud, Sa’ed H.
author_sort Eshtayeh, Malak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient package inserts (PPIs) should provide accurate, sufficient, and clear information for patients as well as health care professionals. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the PPIs of local and imported anti-diabetic agents in the Palestinian market. METHODS: Eighteen leaflets were collected and analysed based on the completeness of 31 criteria using a scoring method, then the quantity of information was assessed by applying word counting of 17 headings and subheadings. Statistical comparisons of the word count for all products were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test with mean ranks. Then the mean ranks for differences in word counts were adjusted to calculate the fold-difference statistic by dividing the higher mean rank by the lower mean rank. RESULTS: In general, the PPIs of imported agents scored better than local PPIs, but none of the inserts fulfilled the whole criteria. Thirteen out of thirty-one criteria were available in all products. None of these agents had provided any information about duration of use, instructions to convert tablets into liquids forms, pharmacokinetics, or shelf life. Moreover, mechanism of action and maximum dose were deficient in all local PPIs (0.0%), while they were included in 37.5 and 62.5% of imported PPIs, respectively. Furthermore, 90.0% of local PPIs lacked information about drug dose, 80.0% didn’t mention any instructions regarding effects on ability to drive or possibility of tablet splitting, and 60.0% didn’t involve orders about possibility of tablet crushing. Local PPIs provided inadequate and less detailed instructions regarding many aspects, since the estimated mean rank of local and imported PPIs demonstrated a range of difference from 1.04-fold for missing dose to 2.64-fold for warning and precautions. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were being identified, with excellence being assigned to imported PPIs. So, it is worth suggesting some necessary modifications in PPI topography and sequence structure of local diabetic agents. Experts in Palestinian Ministry of Health should implement regulatory guidelines to improve the quality and quantity of information provided by local PPIs. This optimisation could become a step forward toward optimal health practice in our society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6679474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66794742019-08-06 A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine Eshtayeh, Malak Draghmeh, Asia Zyoud, Sa’ed H. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient package inserts (PPIs) should provide accurate, sufficient, and clear information for patients as well as health care professionals. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the PPIs of local and imported anti-diabetic agents in the Palestinian market. METHODS: Eighteen leaflets were collected and analysed based on the completeness of 31 criteria using a scoring method, then the quantity of information was assessed by applying word counting of 17 headings and subheadings. Statistical comparisons of the word count for all products were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test with mean ranks. Then the mean ranks for differences in word counts were adjusted to calculate the fold-difference statistic by dividing the higher mean rank by the lower mean rank. RESULTS: In general, the PPIs of imported agents scored better than local PPIs, but none of the inserts fulfilled the whole criteria. Thirteen out of thirty-one criteria were available in all products. None of these agents had provided any information about duration of use, instructions to convert tablets into liquids forms, pharmacokinetics, or shelf life. Moreover, mechanism of action and maximum dose were deficient in all local PPIs (0.0%), while they were included in 37.5 and 62.5% of imported PPIs, respectively. Furthermore, 90.0% of local PPIs lacked information about drug dose, 80.0% didn’t mention any instructions regarding effects on ability to drive or possibility of tablet splitting, and 60.0% didn’t involve orders about possibility of tablet crushing. Local PPIs provided inadequate and less detailed instructions regarding many aspects, since the estimated mean rank of local and imported PPIs demonstrated a range of difference from 1.04-fold for missing dose to 2.64-fold for warning and precautions. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were being identified, with excellence being assigned to imported PPIs. So, it is worth suggesting some necessary modifications in PPI topography and sequence structure of local diabetic agents. Experts in Palestinian Ministry of Health should implement regulatory guidelines to improve the quality and quantity of information provided by local PPIs. This optimisation could become a step forward toward optimal health practice in our society. BioMed Central 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6679474/ /pubmed/31375089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7379-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eshtayeh, Malak
Draghmeh, Asia
Zyoud, Sa’ed H.
A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine
title A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine
title_full A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine
title_short A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine
title_sort comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in palestine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7379-8
work_keys_str_mv AT eshtayehmalak acomparativeevaluationofmedicinepackageinsertsfororalantidiabeticagentsinpalestine
AT draghmehasia acomparativeevaluationofmedicinepackageinsertsfororalantidiabeticagentsinpalestine
AT zyoudsaedh acomparativeevaluationofmedicinepackageinsertsfororalantidiabeticagentsinpalestine
AT eshtayehmalak comparativeevaluationofmedicinepackageinsertsfororalantidiabeticagentsinpalestine
AT draghmehasia comparativeevaluationofmedicinepackageinsertsfororalantidiabeticagentsinpalestine
AT zyoudsaedh comparativeevaluationofmedicinepackageinsertsfororalantidiabeticagentsinpalestine