Cargando…

Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria

BACKGROUND: Reactive case detection (RCD) is an integral part of many malaria control and elimination programmes and can be conceived of as a way of gradually decreasing transmission. However, it is unclear under what circumstances RCD may have a substantial impact on prevalence, how likely it is to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chitnis, Nakul, Pemberton-Ross, Peter, Yukich, Josh, Hamainza, Busiku, Miller, John, Reiker, Theresa, Eisele, Thomas P., Smith, Thomas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2882-z
_version_ 1783441349699174400
author Chitnis, Nakul
Pemberton-Ross, Peter
Yukich, Josh
Hamainza, Busiku
Miller, John
Reiker, Theresa
Eisele, Thomas P.
Smith, Thomas A.
author_facet Chitnis, Nakul
Pemberton-Ross, Peter
Yukich, Josh
Hamainza, Busiku
Miller, John
Reiker, Theresa
Eisele, Thomas P.
Smith, Thomas A.
author_sort Chitnis, Nakul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reactive case detection (RCD) is an integral part of many malaria control and elimination programmes and can be conceived of as a way of gradually decreasing transmission. However, it is unclear under what circumstances RCD may have a substantial impact on prevalence, how likely it is to lead to local elimination, or how effective it needs to be to prevent reintroduction after transmission has been interrupted. METHODS: Analyses and simulations of a discrete time compartmental susceptible-infectious-susceptible (SIS) model were used to understand the mechanisms of how RCD changes transmission dynamics and estimate the impact of RCD programmes in a range of settings with varying patterns of transmission potential and programme characteristics. Prevalence survey data from recent studies in Zambia were used to capture the effects of spatial clustering of patent infections. RESULTS: RCD proved most effective at low prevalence. Increasing the number of index cases followed was more important than increasing the number of neighbours tested per index case. Elimination was achieved only in simulations of situations with very low transmission intensity and following many index cases. However, RCD appears to be helpful in maintaining the disease-free state after achieving malaria elimination (through other interventions). CONCLUSION: RCD alone can eliminate malaria in only a very limited range of settings, where transmission potential is very low, and improving the coverage of RCD has little effect on this range. In other settings, it is likely to reduce disease burden. RCD may also help maintain the disease-free state in the face of imported infections. Prevalence survey data can be used to estimate a targeting ratio (the ratio of prevalence found through RCD to that in the general population) which is an important determinant of the effect of RCD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-019-2882-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6679501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66795012019-08-06 Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria Chitnis, Nakul Pemberton-Ross, Peter Yukich, Josh Hamainza, Busiku Miller, John Reiker, Theresa Eisele, Thomas P. Smith, Thomas A. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Reactive case detection (RCD) is an integral part of many malaria control and elimination programmes and can be conceived of as a way of gradually decreasing transmission. However, it is unclear under what circumstances RCD may have a substantial impact on prevalence, how likely it is to lead to local elimination, or how effective it needs to be to prevent reintroduction after transmission has been interrupted. METHODS: Analyses and simulations of a discrete time compartmental susceptible-infectious-susceptible (SIS) model were used to understand the mechanisms of how RCD changes transmission dynamics and estimate the impact of RCD programmes in a range of settings with varying patterns of transmission potential and programme characteristics. Prevalence survey data from recent studies in Zambia were used to capture the effects of spatial clustering of patent infections. RESULTS: RCD proved most effective at low prevalence. Increasing the number of index cases followed was more important than increasing the number of neighbours tested per index case. Elimination was achieved only in simulations of situations with very low transmission intensity and following many index cases. However, RCD appears to be helpful in maintaining the disease-free state after achieving malaria elimination (through other interventions). CONCLUSION: RCD alone can eliminate malaria in only a very limited range of settings, where transmission potential is very low, and improving the coverage of RCD has little effect on this range. In other settings, it is likely to reduce disease burden. RCD may also help maintain the disease-free state in the face of imported infections. Prevalence survey data can be used to estimate a targeting ratio (the ratio of prevalence found through RCD to that in the general population) which is an important determinant of the effect of RCD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-019-2882-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6679501/ /pubmed/31375094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2882-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chitnis, Nakul
Pemberton-Ross, Peter
Yukich, Josh
Hamainza, Busiku
Miller, John
Reiker, Theresa
Eisele, Thomas P.
Smith, Thomas A.
Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria
title Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria
title_full Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria
title_fullStr Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria
title_full_unstemmed Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria
title_short Theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria
title_sort theory of reactive interventions in the elimination and control of malaria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2882-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chitnisnakul theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria
AT pembertonrosspeter theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria
AT yukichjosh theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria
AT hamainzabusiku theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria
AT millerjohn theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria
AT reikertheresa theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria
AT eiselethomasp theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria
AT smiththomasa theoryofreactiveinterventionsintheeliminationandcontrolofmalaria