Cargando…

Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors

A hip prosthesis design with larger femoral head size may improve functional outcomes compared to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) design. Our aim was to compare the range of motion (RoM) in lower body joints during squats, gait and stair walking using a wearable movement analysis syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grip, Helena, Nilsson, Kjell G, Häger, Charlotte K, Lundström, Ronnie, Öhberg, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19143240
_version_ 1783441352750530560
author Grip, Helena
Nilsson, Kjell G
Häger, Charlotte K
Lundström, Ronnie
Öhberg, Fredrik
author_facet Grip, Helena
Nilsson, Kjell G
Häger, Charlotte K
Lundström, Ronnie
Öhberg, Fredrik
author_sort Grip, Helena
collection PubMed
description A hip prosthesis design with larger femoral head size may improve functional outcomes compared to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) design. Our aim was to compare the range of motion (RoM) in lower body joints during squats, gait and stair walking using a wearable movement analysis system based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) in three age-matched male groups: 6 males with a conventional THA (THAC), 9 with a large femoral head (LFH) design, and 8 hip- and knee-asymptomatic controls (CTRL). We hypothesized that the LFH design would allow a greater hip RoM, providing movement patterns more like CTRL, and a larger side difference in hip RoM in THAC when compared to LFH and controls. IMUs were attached to the pelvis, thighs and shanks during five trials of squats, gait, and stair ascending/descending performed at self-selected speed. THAC and LFH participants completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). The results showed a larger hip RoM during squats in LFH compared to THAC. Side differences in LFH and THAC groups (operated vs. non-operated side) indicated that movement function was not fully recovered in either group, further corroborated by non-maximal mean HOOS scores (LFH: 83 ± 13, THAC: 84 ± 19 groups, vs. normal function 100). The IMU system may have the potential to enhance clinical movement evaluations as an adjunct to clinical scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6679514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66795142019-08-19 Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors Grip, Helena Nilsson, Kjell G Häger, Charlotte K Lundström, Ronnie Öhberg, Fredrik Sensors (Basel) Article A hip prosthesis design with larger femoral head size may improve functional outcomes compared to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) design. Our aim was to compare the range of motion (RoM) in lower body joints during squats, gait and stair walking using a wearable movement analysis system based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) in three age-matched male groups: 6 males with a conventional THA (THAC), 9 with a large femoral head (LFH) design, and 8 hip- and knee-asymptomatic controls (CTRL). We hypothesized that the LFH design would allow a greater hip RoM, providing movement patterns more like CTRL, and a larger side difference in hip RoM in THAC when compared to LFH and controls. IMUs were attached to the pelvis, thighs and shanks during five trials of squats, gait, and stair ascending/descending performed at self-selected speed. THAC and LFH participants completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). The results showed a larger hip RoM during squats in LFH compared to THAC. Side differences in LFH and THAC groups (operated vs. non-operated side) indicated that movement function was not fully recovered in either group, further corroborated by non-maximal mean HOOS scores (LFH: 83 ± 13, THAC: 84 ± 19 groups, vs. normal function 100). The IMU system may have the potential to enhance clinical movement evaluations as an adjunct to clinical scales. MDPI 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6679514/ /pubmed/31340548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19143240 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grip, Helena
Nilsson, Kjell G
Häger, Charlotte K
Lundström, Ronnie
Öhberg, Fredrik
Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors
title Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors
title_full Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors
title_fullStr Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors
title_short Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors
title_sort does the femoral head size in hip arthroplasty influence lower body movements during squats, gait and stair walking? a clinical pilot study based on wearable motion sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19143240
work_keys_str_mv AT griphelena doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors
AT nilssonkjellg doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors
AT hagercharlottek doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors
AT lundstromronnie doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors
AT ohbergfredrik doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors