Cargando…
Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors
A hip prosthesis design with larger femoral head size may improve functional outcomes compared to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) design. Our aim was to compare the range of motion (RoM) in lower body joints during squats, gait and stair walking using a wearable movement analysis syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19143240 |
_version_ | 1783441352750530560 |
---|---|
author | Grip, Helena Nilsson, Kjell G Häger, Charlotte K Lundström, Ronnie Öhberg, Fredrik |
author_facet | Grip, Helena Nilsson, Kjell G Häger, Charlotte K Lundström, Ronnie Öhberg, Fredrik |
author_sort | Grip, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | A hip prosthesis design with larger femoral head size may improve functional outcomes compared to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) design. Our aim was to compare the range of motion (RoM) in lower body joints during squats, gait and stair walking using a wearable movement analysis system based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) in three age-matched male groups: 6 males with a conventional THA (THAC), 9 with a large femoral head (LFH) design, and 8 hip- and knee-asymptomatic controls (CTRL). We hypothesized that the LFH design would allow a greater hip RoM, providing movement patterns more like CTRL, and a larger side difference in hip RoM in THAC when compared to LFH and controls. IMUs were attached to the pelvis, thighs and shanks during five trials of squats, gait, and stair ascending/descending performed at self-selected speed. THAC and LFH participants completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). The results showed a larger hip RoM during squats in LFH compared to THAC. Side differences in LFH and THAC groups (operated vs. non-operated side) indicated that movement function was not fully recovered in either group, further corroborated by non-maximal mean HOOS scores (LFH: 83 ± 13, THAC: 84 ± 19 groups, vs. normal function 100). The IMU system may have the potential to enhance clinical movement evaluations as an adjunct to clinical scales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6679514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66795142019-08-19 Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors Grip, Helena Nilsson, Kjell G Häger, Charlotte K Lundström, Ronnie Öhberg, Fredrik Sensors (Basel) Article A hip prosthesis design with larger femoral head size may improve functional outcomes compared to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) design. Our aim was to compare the range of motion (RoM) in lower body joints during squats, gait and stair walking using a wearable movement analysis system based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) in three age-matched male groups: 6 males with a conventional THA (THAC), 9 with a large femoral head (LFH) design, and 8 hip- and knee-asymptomatic controls (CTRL). We hypothesized that the LFH design would allow a greater hip RoM, providing movement patterns more like CTRL, and a larger side difference in hip RoM in THAC when compared to LFH and controls. IMUs were attached to the pelvis, thighs and shanks during five trials of squats, gait, and stair ascending/descending performed at self-selected speed. THAC and LFH participants completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). The results showed a larger hip RoM during squats in LFH compared to THAC. Side differences in LFH and THAC groups (operated vs. non-operated side) indicated that movement function was not fully recovered in either group, further corroborated by non-maximal mean HOOS scores (LFH: 83 ± 13, THAC: 84 ± 19 groups, vs. normal function 100). The IMU system may have the potential to enhance clinical movement evaluations as an adjunct to clinical scales. MDPI 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6679514/ /pubmed/31340548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19143240 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grip, Helena Nilsson, Kjell G Häger, Charlotte K Lundström, Ronnie Öhberg, Fredrik Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors |
title | Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors |
title_full | Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors |
title_fullStr | Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors |
title_short | Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors |
title_sort | does the femoral head size in hip arthroplasty influence lower body movements during squats, gait and stair walking? a clinical pilot study based on wearable motion sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31340548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19143240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griphelena doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors AT nilssonkjellg doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors AT hagercharlottek doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors AT lundstromronnie doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors AT ohbergfredrik doesthefemoralheadsizeinhiparthroplastyinfluencelowerbodymovementsduringsquatsgaitandstairwalkingaclinicalpilotstudybasedonwearablemotionsensors |