Cargando…
Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care
BACKGROUND: Geriatric rehabilitation care (GRC) is short-term and multidisciplinary rehabilitation care for older vulnerable clients. Studies were conducted about its effects. However, elements that influence the quality of GRC have not been studied previously. METHODS: In this study realist evaluat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0 |
_version_ | 1783441360064348160 |
---|---|
author | Janssen, Meriam M. Vos, Willeke Luijkx, Katrien G. |
author_facet | Janssen, Meriam M. Vos, Willeke Luijkx, Katrien G. |
author_sort | Janssen, Meriam M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Geriatric rehabilitation care (GRC) is short-term and multidisciplinary rehabilitation care for older vulnerable clients. Studies were conducted about its effects. However, elements that influence the quality of GRC have not been studied previously. METHODS: In this study realist evaluation is used to find out which are the mechanisms and outcomes and which (groups of) persons are the context for GRC, according to GRC professionals. The mechanisms, outcomes and context of GRC were explored in three consecutive phases of qualitative data gathering, i.e. individual interviews, expert meeting, and focus groups. RESULTS: Eight mechanisms — client centeredness, client satisfaction during rehabilitation, therapeutic climate, information provision to client and informal care givers, consultation about the rehabilitation (process), cooperation within the MultiDisciplinary Team (MDT), professionalism of GRC professionals, and organizational aspects — were found. Four context groups—the client, his family and/or informal care giver(s), the individual GRC professional, and the MDT—were mentioned by the respondents. Last, two outcome factors were determined, i.e. client satisfaction at discharge and rehabilitation goals accomplished. CONCLUSIONS: In order to translate these insights into a practical tool that can be used by MDTs in the practice of GRC, identified mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes were visualized in a GRC evaluation tool. A graphic designer developed an interactive PDF which is the GRC evaluation tool. This tool may enable MDTs to discuss, prioritize, evaluate, and improve the quality of their GRC practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6679545 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66795452019-08-06 Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care Janssen, Meriam M. Vos, Willeke Luijkx, Katrien G. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Geriatric rehabilitation care (GRC) is short-term and multidisciplinary rehabilitation care for older vulnerable clients. Studies were conducted about its effects. However, elements that influence the quality of GRC have not been studied previously. METHODS: In this study realist evaluation is used to find out which are the mechanisms and outcomes and which (groups of) persons are the context for GRC, according to GRC professionals. The mechanisms, outcomes and context of GRC were explored in three consecutive phases of qualitative data gathering, i.e. individual interviews, expert meeting, and focus groups. RESULTS: Eight mechanisms — client centeredness, client satisfaction during rehabilitation, therapeutic climate, information provision to client and informal care givers, consultation about the rehabilitation (process), cooperation within the MultiDisciplinary Team (MDT), professionalism of GRC professionals, and organizational aspects — were found. Four context groups—the client, his family and/or informal care giver(s), the individual GRC professional, and the MDT—were mentioned by the respondents. Last, two outcome factors were determined, i.e. client satisfaction at discharge and rehabilitation goals accomplished. CONCLUSIONS: In order to translate these insights into a practical tool that can be used by MDTs in the practice of GRC, identified mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes were visualized in a GRC evaluation tool. A graphic designer developed an interactive PDF which is the GRC evaluation tool. This tool may enable MDTs to discuss, prioritize, evaluate, and improve the quality of their GRC practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6679545/ /pubmed/31375079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Janssen, Meriam M. Vos, Willeke Luijkx, Katrien G. Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care |
title | Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care |
title_full | Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care |
title_fullStr | Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care |
title_short | Development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care |
title_sort | development of an evaluation tool for geriatric rehabilitation care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679545/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1213-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssenmeriamm developmentofanevaluationtoolforgeriatricrehabilitationcare AT voswilleke developmentofanevaluationtoolforgeriatricrehabilitationcare AT luijkxkatrieng developmentofanevaluationtoolforgeriatricrehabilitationcare |