Cargando…

Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration

Although extensive angiogenesis takes place in glial tumors, antiangiogenic therapies have remained without the expected success. In the peripheral circulation of glioma patients, increased numbers of endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) are present, potentially offering targets for antiangiogenic the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huizer, Karin, Sacchetti, Andrea, Dik, Wim A., Mustafa, Dana A., Kros, Johan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3560830
_version_ 1783441398758899712
author Huizer, Karin
Sacchetti, Andrea
Dik, Wim A.
Mustafa, Dana A.
Kros, Johan M.
author_facet Huizer, Karin
Sacchetti, Andrea
Dik, Wim A.
Mustafa, Dana A.
Kros, Johan M.
author_sort Huizer, Karin
collection PubMed
description Although extensive angiogenesis takes place in glial tumors, antiangiogenic therapies have remained without the expected success. In the peripheral circulation of glioma patients, increased numbers of endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) are present, potentially offering targets for antiangiogenic therapy. However, for an antiangiogenic therapy to be successful, the therapy should specifically target glioma-related EPC subsets and secreted factors only. Here, we compared the EPC subsets and plasma factors in the peripheral circulation of patients with gliomas to acute myocardial infarctions. We investigated the five most important EPC subsets and 21 angiogenesis-related plasma factors in peripheral blood samples of 29 patients with glioma, 14 patients with myocardial infarction, and 20 healthy people as controls, by FACS and Luminex assay. In GBM patients, all EPC subsets were elevated as compared to healthy subjects. In addition, HPC and KDR(+) cell fractions were higher than in MI, while CD133(+) and KDR(+)CD133(+) cell fractions were lower. There were differences in relative EPC fractions between the groups: KDR(+) cells were the largest fraction in GBM, while CD133(+) cells were the largest fraction in MI. An increase in glioma malignancy grade coincided with an increase in the KDR(+) fraction, while the CD133(+) cell fraction decreased relatively. Most plasma angiogenic factors were higher in GBM than in MI patients. In both MI and GBM, the ratio of CD133(+) HPCs correlated significantly with elevated levels of MMP9. In the GBM patients, MMP9 correlated strongly with levels of all HPCs. In conclusion, the data demonstrate that EPC traffic in patients with glioma, representing neoplasia, is different from that in myocardial infarction, representing tissue regeneration. Glioma patients may benefit from therapies aimed at lowering KDR(+) cells and HPCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6679840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66798402019-08-19 Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration Huizer, Karin Sacchetti, Andrea Dik, Wim A. Mustafa, Dana A. Kros, Johan M. J Oncol Research Article Although extensive angiogenesis takes place in glial tumors, antiangiogenic therapies have remained without the expected success. In the peripheral circulation of glioma patients, increased numbers of endothelial precursor cells (EPCs) are present, potentially offering targets for antiangiogenic therapy. However, for an antiangiogenic therapy to be successful, the therapy should specifically target glioma-related EPC subsets and secreted factors only. Here, we compared the EPC subsets and plasma factors in the peripheral circulation of patients with gliomas to acute myocardial infarctions. We investigated the five most important EPC subsets and 21 angiogenesis-related plasma factors in peripheral blood samples of 29 patients with glioma, 14 patients with myocardial infarction, and 20 healthy people as controls, by FACS and Luminex assay. In GBM patients, all EPC subsets were elevated as compared to healthy subjects. In addition, HPC and KDR(+) cell fractions were higher than in MI, while CD133(+) and KDR(+)CD133(+) cell fractions were lower. There were differences in relative EPC fractions between the groups: KDR(+) cells were the largest fraction in GBM, while CD133(+) cells were the largest fraction in MI. An increase in glioma malignancy grade coincided with an increase in the KDR(+) fraction, while the CD133(+) cell fraction decreased relatively. Most plasma angiogenic factors were higher in GBM than in MI patients. In both MI and GBM, the ratio of CD133(+) HPCs correlated significantly with elevated levels of MMP9. In the GBM patients, MMP9 correlated strongly with levels of all HPCs. In conclusion, the data demonstrate that EPC traffic in patients with glioma, representing neoplasia, is different from that in myocardial infarction, representing tissue regeneration. Glioma patients may benefit from therapies aimed at lowering KDR(+) cells and HPCs. Hindawi 2019-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6679840/ /pubmed/31428150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3560830 Text en Copyright © 2019 Karin Huizer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huizer, Karin
Sacchetti, Andrea
Dik, Wim A.
Mustafa, Dana A.
Kros, Johan M.
Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration
title Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration
title_full Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration
title_fullStr Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration
title_short Circulating Proangiogenic Cells and Proteins in Patients with Glioma and Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differences in Neovascularization between Neoplasia and Tissue Regeneration
title_sort circulating proangiogenic cells and proteins in patients with glioma and acute myocardial infarction: differences in neovascularization between neoplasia and tissue regeneration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3560830
work_keys_str_mv AT huizerkarin circulatingproangiogeniccellsandproteinsinpatientswithgliomaandacutemyocardialinfarctiondifferencesinneovascularizationbetweenneoplasiaandtissueregeneration
AT sacchettiandrea circulatingproangiogeniccellsandproteinsinpatientswithgliomaandacutemyocardialinfarctiondifferencesinneovascularizationbetweenneoplasiaandtissueregeneration
AT dikwima circulatingproangiogeniccellsandproteinsinpatientswithgliomaandacutemyocardialinfarctiondifferencesinneovascularizationbetweenneoplasiaandtissueregeneration
AT mustafadanaa circulatingproangiogeniccellsandproteinsinpatientswithgliomaandacutemyocardialinfarctiondifferencesinneovascularizationbetweenneoplasiaandtissueregeneration
AT krosjohanm circulatingproangiogeniccellsandproteinsinpatientswithgliomaandacutemyocardialinfarctiondifferencesinneovascularizationbetweenneoplasiaandtissueregeneration