Cargando…

Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles. METHODS: Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three 19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskandari, Armen, Koo, Patrick, Bang, Heejung, Gui, Dorina, Urayama, Shiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288504
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.005
_version_ 1783441421402898432
author Eskandari, Armen
Koo, Patrick
Bang, Heejung
Gui, Dorina
Urayama, Shiro
author_facet Eskandari, Armen
Koo, Patrick
Bang, Heejung
Gui, Dorina
Urayama, Shiro
author_sort Eskandari, Armen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles. METHODS: Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three 19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies were performed per needle with 10 mL of wet suction. The primary outcome was the number of complete portal tracts (CPTs) per needle aspirate. The secondary outcomes were the mean specimen length and mean fragment length. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were applied. RESULTS: All 19 G needles and the 20 G needle yielded similar mean CPTs and were superior to the SharkCore 22 G needle (p<0.001 adjusted for multiplicity). There was no statistically significant difference in total specimen length among the three 19 G needles and the 20 G needle tested. The two 22 G needles performed similarly with respect to the number of CPTs, mean fragment length, and mean specimen length (adjusted p=0.07, p=0.59, and p=0.10, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The specimen adequacy was similar among the 3 latest commercially available 19 G needles. The endoscopist may choose a larger-bore needle based on availability without concerns of specimen adequacy. Further studies are needed to assess the ease of needle use in various anatomical locations and to confirm the optimal needle design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6680021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66800212019-08-05 Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy Eskandari, Armen Koo, Patrick Bang, Heejung Gui, Dorina Urayama, Shiro Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles. METHODS: Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three 19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies were performed per needle with 10 mL of wet suction. The primary outcome was the number of complete portal tracts (CPTs) per needle aspirate. The secondary outcomes were the mean specimen length and mean fragment length. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were applied. RESULTS: All 19 G needles and the 20 G needle yielded similar mean CPTs and were superior to the SharkCore 22 G needle (p<0.001 adjusted for multiplicity). There was no statistically significant difference in total specimen length among the three 19 G needles and the 20 G needle tested. The two 22 G needles performed similarly with respect to the number of CPTs, mean fragment length, and mean specimen length (adjusted p=0.07, p=0.59, and p=0.10, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The specimen adequacy was similar among the 3 latest commercially available 19 G needles. The endoscopist may choose a larger-bore needle based on availability without concerns of specimen adequacy. Further studies are needed to assess the ease of needle use in various anatomical locations and to confirm the optimal needle design. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019-07 2019-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6680021/ /pubmed/31288504 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.005 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eskandari, Armen
Koo, Patrick
Bang, Heejung
Gui, Dorina
Urayama, Shiro
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
title Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
title_full Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
title_fullStr Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
title_short Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy
title_sort comparison of endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31288504
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2019.005
work_keys_str_mv AT eskandariarmen comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsyneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT koopatrick comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsyneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT bangheejung comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsyneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT guidorina comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsyneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT urayamashiro comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsyneedlesforendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy