Cargando…

The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine the relationship between laboratory testing (including test volume and turnaround time [TAT]) and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), using linked patient‐level data from four hospitals across 4 years. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multisite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ling, Georgiou, Andrew, Vecellio, Elia, Eigenstetter, Alex, Toouli, George, Wilson, Roger, Westbrook, Johanna I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12565
_version_ 1783441451744493568
author Li, Ling
Georgiou, Andrew
Vecellio, Elia
Eigenstetter, Alex
Toouli, George
Wilson, Roger
Westbrook, Johanna I.
author_facet Li, Ling
Georgiou, Andrew
Vecellio, Elia
Eigenstetter, Alex
Toouli, George
Wilson, Roger
Westbrook, Johanna I.
author_sort Li, Ling
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine the relationship between laboratory testing (including test volume and turnaround time [TAT]) and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), using linked patient‐level data from four hospitals across 4 years. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multisite cohort study of patients presenting to any one of four EDs in New South Wales, Australia, during a 2‐month period (August and September) in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Data from ED information systems were linked to laboratory test data. A cross‐classified random‐effect modeling approach was applied to identify factors affecting ED LOS, taking into account the correlation between patients' presentations at the same hospital and/or in the same calendar year. Number of test order episodes (tests ordered at one point in time during the ED stay) and TAT (time from laboratory order receipt to result available) were examined. RESULTS: As the number of test order episodes increased, so did the duration of patient ED LOS (p < 0.0001). For every five additional tests ordered per test order episode, the median ED LOS increased by 10 minutes (2.9%, p < 0.0001); each 30‐minute increase in TAT was, on average, associated with a 5.1% (17 minutes; p < 0.0001) increase in ED LOS, after adjustment for other factors. Patients presenting to the ED at night (7 p.m. to 7 a.m.) had longer stays than those presenting during the daytime, although the median TATs at nights were shorter than those during the daytime. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory testing has a direct effect on patients' LOS in ED. Laboratory TAT, number of testing episodes, and test volume influence ED LOS. Targeted increases of ED resources and staffing after‐hours may also contribute to reductions in ED LOS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6680199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66801992019-08-09 The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach Li, Ling Georgiou, Andrew Vecellio, Elia Eigenstetter, Alex Toouli, George Wilson, Roger Westbrook, Johanna I. Acad Emerg Med Original Contributions OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine the relationship between laboratory testing (including test volume and turnaround time [TAT]) and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), using linked patient‐level data from four hospitals across 4 years. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multisite cohort study of patients presenting to any one of four EDs in New South Wales, Australia, during a 2‐month period (August and September) in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Data from ED information systems were linked to laboratory test data. A cross‐classified random‐effect modeling approach was applied to identify factors affecting ED LOS, taking into account the correlation between patients' presentations at the same hospital and/or in the same calendar year. Number of test order episodes (tests ordered at one point in time during the ED stay) and TAT (time from laboratory order receipt to result available) were examined. RESULTS: As the number of test order episodes increased, so did the duration of patient ED LOS (p < 0.0001). For every five additional tests ordered per test order episode, the median ED LOS increased by 10 minutes (2.9%, p < 0.0001); each 30‐minute increase in TAT was, on average, associated with a 5.1% (17 minutes; p < 0.0001) increase in ED LOS, after adjustment for other factors. Patients presenting to the ED at night (7 p.m. to 7 a.m.) had longer stays than those presenting during the daytime, although the median TATs at nights were shorter than those during the daytime. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory testing has a direct effect on patients' LOS in ED. Laboratory TAT, number of testing episodes, and test volume influence ED LOS. Targeted increases of ED resources and staffing after‐hours may also contribute to reductions in ED LOS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6680199/ /pubmed/25565488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12565 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Li, Ling
Georgiou, Andrew
Vecellio, Elia
Eigenstetter, Alex
Toouli, George
Wilson, Roger
Westbrook, Johanna I.
The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach
title The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach
title_full The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach
title_fullStr The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach
title_short The Effect of Laboratory Testing on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Multihospital Longitudinal Study Applying a Cross‐classified Random‐effect Modeling Approach
title_sort effect of laboratory testing on emergency department length of stay: a multihospital longitudinal study applying a cross‐classified random‐effect modeling approach
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12565
work_keys_str_mv AT liling theeffectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT georgiouandrew theeffectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT vecellioelia theeffectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT eigenstetteralex theeffectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT toouligeorge theeffectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT wilsonroger theeffectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT westbrookjohannai theeffectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT liling effectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT georgiouandrew effectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT vecellioelia effectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT eigenstetteralex effectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT toouligeorge effectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT wilsonroger effectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach
AT westbrookjohannai effectoflaboratorytestingonemergencydepartmentlengthofstayamultihospitallongitudinalstudyapplyingacrossclassifiedrandomeffectmodelingapproach