Cargando…
ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls
Multiplex immunoassays confer several advantages over widely adopted singleplex immunoassays including increased efficiency at a reduced expense, greater output per sample volume ratios and higher throughput predicating more resolute, detailed diagnostics and facilitating personalised medicine. None...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400130 |
_version_ | 1783441465924386816 |
---|---|
author | Tighe, Patrick J. Ryder, Richard R. Todd, Ian Fairclough, Lucy C. |
author_facet | Tighe, Patrick J. Ryder, Richard R. Todd, Ian Fairclough, Lucy C. |
author_sort | Tighe, Patrick J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiplex immunoassays confer several advantages over widely adopted singleplex immunoassays including increased efficiency at a reduced expense, greater output per sample volume ratios and higher throughput predicating more resolute, detailed diagnostics and facilitating personalised medicine. Nonetheless, to date, relatively few protein multiplex immunoassays have been validated for in vitro diagnostics in clinical/point‐of‐care settings. This review article will outline the challenges, which must be ameliorated prior to the widespread integration of multiplex immunoassays in clinical settings: (i) biomarker validation; (ii) standardisation of immunoassay design and quality control (calibration and quantification); (iii) availability, stability, specificity and cross‐reactivity of reagents; (iv) assay automation and the use of validated algorithms for transformation of raw data into diagnostic results. A compendium of multiplex immunoassays applicable to in vitro diagnostics and a summary of the diagnostic products currently available commercially are included, along with an analysis of the relative states of development for each format (namely planar slide based, suspension and planar/microtitre plate based) with respect to the aforementioned issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6680274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66802742019-08-09 ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls Tighe, Patrick J. Ryder, Richard R. Todd, Ian Fairclough, Lucy C. Proteomics Clin Appl Reviews Multiplex immunoassays confer several advantages over widely adopted singleplex immunoassays including increased efficiency at a reduced expense, greater output per sample volume ratios and higher throughput predicating more resolute, detailed diagnostics and facilitating personalised medicine. Nonetheless, to date, relatively few protein multiplex immunoassays have been validated for in vitro diagnostics in clinical/point‐of‐care settings. This review article will outline the challenges, which must be ameliorated prior to the widespread integration of multiplex immunoassays in clinical settings: (i) biomarker validation; (ii) standardisation of immunoassay design and quality control (calibration and quantification); (iii) availability, stability, specificity and cross‐reactivity of reagents; (iv) assay automation and the use of validated algorithms for transformation of raw data into diagnostic results. A compendium of multiplex immunoassays applicable to in vitro diagnostics and a summary of the diagnostic products currently available commercially are included, along with an analysis of the relative states of development for each format (namely planar slide based, suspension and planar/microtitre plate based) with respect to the aforementioned issues. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-25 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6680274/ /pubmed/25644123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400130 Text en © 2015 The Authors. PROTEOMICS ‐ Clinical Applications Published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Tighe, Patrick J. Ryder, Richard R. Todd, Ian Fairclough, Lucy C. ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls |
title | ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls |
title_full | ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls |
title_fullStr | ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls |
title_full_unstemmed | ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls |
title_short | ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls |
title_sort | elisa in the multiplex era: potentials and pitfalls |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tighepatrickj elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls AT ryderrichardr elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls AT toddian elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls AT faircloughlucyc elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls |