Cargando…

ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls

Multiplex immunoassays confer several advantages over widely adopted singleplex immunoassays including increased efficiency at a reduced expense, greater output per sample volume ratios and higher throughput predicating more resolute, detailed diagnostics and facilitating personalised medicine. None...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tighe, Patrick J., Ryder, Richard R., Todd, Ian, Fairclough, Lucy C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400130
_version_ 1783441465924386816
author Tighe, Patrick J.
Ryder, Richard R.
Todd, Ian
Fairclough, Lucy C.
author_facet Tighe, Patrick J.
Ryder, Richard R.
Todd, Ian
Fairclough, Lucy C.
author_sort Tighe, Patrick J.
collection PubMed
description Multiplex immunoassays confer several advantages over widely adopted singleplex immunoassays including increased efficiency at a reduced expense, greater output per sample volume ratios and higher throughput predicating more resolute, detailed diagnostics and facilitating personalised medicine. Nonetheless, to date, relatively few protein multiplex immunoassays have been validated for in vitro diagnostics in clinical/point‐of‐care settings. This review article will outline the challenges, which must be ameliorated prior to the widespread integration of multiplex immunoassays in clinical settings: (i) biomarker validation; (ii) standardisation of immunoassay design and quality control (calibration and quantification); (iii) availability, stability, specificity and cross‐reactivity of reagents; (iv) assay automation and the use of validated algorithms for transformation of raw data into diagnostic results. A compendium of multiplex immunoassays applicable to in vitro diagnostics and a summary of the diagnostic products currently available commercially are included, along with an analysis of the relative states of development for each format (namely planar slide based, suspension and planar/microtitre plate based) with respect to the aforementioned issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6680274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66802742019-08-09 ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls Tighe, Patrick J. Ryder, Richard R. Todd, Ian Fairclough, Lucy C. Proteomics Clin Appl Reviews Multiplex immunoassays confer several advantages over widely adopted singleplex immunoassays including increased efficiency at a reduced expense, greater output per sample volume ratios and higher throughput predicating more resolute, detailed diagnostics and facilitating personalised medicine. Nonetheless, to date, relatively few protein multiplex immunoassays have been validated for in vitro diagnostics in clinical/point‐of‐care settings. This review article will outline the challenges, which must be ameliorated prior to the widespread integration of multiplex immunoassays in clinical settings: (i) biomarker validation; (ii) standardisation of immunoassay design and quality control (calibration and quantification); (iii) availability, stability, specificity and cross‐reactivity of reagents; (iv) assay automation and the use of validated algorithms for transformation of raw data into diagnostic results. A compendium of multiplex immunoassays applicable to in vitro diagnostics and a summary of the diagnostic products currently available commercially are included, along with an analysis of the relative states of development for each format (namely planar slide based, suspension and planar/microtitre plate based) with respect to the aforementioned issues. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-25 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6680274/ /pubmed/25644123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400130 Text en © 2015 The Authors. PROTEOMICS ‐ Clinical Applications Published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Tighe, Patrick J.
Ryder, Richard R.
Todd, Ian
Fairclough, Lucy C.
ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls
title ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls
title_full ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls
title_fullStr ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls
title_full_unstemmed ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls
title_short ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls
title_sort elisa in the multiplex era: potentials and pitfalls
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400130
work_keys_str_mv AT tighepatrickj elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls
AT ryderrichardr elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls
AT toddian elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls
AT faircloughlucyc elisainthemultiplexerapotentialsandpitfalls