Cargando…
Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements
Radiographic angles are used to assess the severity of hallux valgus deformity, make preoperative plans, evaluate outcomes after surgery, and compare results between different methods. Traditionally, hallux valgus angle (HVA) has been measured by using a protractor and a marker pen with hardcopy rad...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25763918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.22872 |
_version_ | 1783441466395197440 |
---|---|
author | Meng, Hong‐Zheng Zhang, Wei‐Lin Li, Xiu‐Cheng Yang, Mao‐Wei |
author_facet | Meng, Hong‐Zheng Zhang, Wei‐Lin Li, Xiu‐Cheng Yang, Mao‐Wei |
author_sort | Meng, Hong‐Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiographic angles are used to assess the severity of hallux valgus deformity, make preoperative plans, evaluate outcomes after surgery, and compare results between different methods. Traditionally, hallux valgus angle (HVA) has been measured by using a protractor and a marker pen with hardcopy radiographs. The main objective of this study is to compare HVA measurements performed using a smartphone and a traditional protractor. The secondary objective was to compare the time taken between those two methods. Six observers measured major HVA on 20 radiographs of hallux valgus deformity with both a standard protractor and an Apple iPhone. Four of the observers repeated the measurements at least a week after the original measurements. The mean absolute difference between pairs of protractor and smartphone measurements was 3.2°. The 95% confidence intervals for intra‐observer variability were ±3.1° for the smartphone measurement and ±3.2° for the protractor method. The 95% confidence intervals for inter‐observer variability were ±9.1° for the smartphone measurement and ±9.6° for the protractor measurement. We conclude that the smartphone is equivalent to the protractor for the accuracy of HVA measurement. But, the time taken in smartphone measurement was also reduced. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:1250–1254, 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6680276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66802762019-08-09 Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements Meng, Hong‐Zheng Zhang, Wei‐Lin Li, Xiu‐Cheng Yang, Mao‐Wei J Orthop Res Research Articles Radiographic angles are used to assess the severity of hallux valgus deformity, make preoperative plans, evaluate outcomes after surgery, and compare results between different methods. Traditionally, hallux valgus angle (HVA) has been measured by using a protractor and a marker pen with hardcopy radiographs. The main objective of this study is to compare HVA measurements performed using a smartphone and a traditional protractor. The secondary objective was to compare the time taken between those two methods. Six observers measured major HVA on 20 radiographs of hallux valgus deformity with both a standard protractor and an Apple iPhone. Four of the observers repeated the measurements at least a week after the original measurements. The mean absolute difference between pairs of protractor and smartphone measurements was 3.2°. The 95% confidence intervals for intra‐observer variability were ±3.1° for the smartphone measurement and ±3.2° for the protractor method. The 95% confidence intervals for inter‐observer variability were ±9.1° for the smartphone measurement and ±9.6° for the protractor measurement. We conclude that the smartphone is equivalent to the protractor for the accuracy of HVA measurement. But, the time taken in smartphone measurement was also reduced. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:1250–1254, 2015. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08 2015-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6680276/ /pubmed/25763918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.22872 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Meng, Hong‐Zheng Zhang, Wei‐Lin Li, Xiu‐Cheng Yang, Mao‐Wei Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements |
title | Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements |
title_full | Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements |
title_fullStr | Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements |
title_short | Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements |
title_sort | radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between protractor and iphone measurements |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25763918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.22872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menghongzheng radiographicanglesinhalluxvalguscomparisonbetweenprotractorandiphonemeasurements AT zhangweilin radiographicanglesinhalluxvalguscomparisonbetweenprotractorandiphonemeasurements AT lixiucheng radiographicanglesinhalluxvalguscomparisonbetweenprotractorandiphonemeasurements AT yangmaowei radiographicanglesinhalluxvalguscomparisonbetweenprotractorandiphonemeasurements |