Cargando…

White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups

Subcortical white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in the aging population frequently represent vascular injury that may lead to cognitive impairment. WMH progression is well described, but the factors underlying WMH regression remain poorly understood. A sample of 351 participants from the Alzheimer’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Janabi, Omar M., Bauer, Christopher E., Goldstein, Larry B., Murphy, Richard R., Bahrani, Ahmed A., Smith, Charles D., Wilcock, Donna M., Gold, Brian T., Jicha, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330933
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9070170
_version_ 1783441569066516480
author Al-Janabi, Omar M.
Bauer, Christopher E.
Goldstein, Larry B.
Murphy, Richard R.
Bahrani, Ahmed A.
Smith, Charles D.
Wilcock, Donna M.
Gold, Brian T.
Jicha, Gregory A.
author_facet Al-Janabi, Omar M.
Bauer, Christopher E.
Goldstein, Larry B.
Murphy, Richard R.
Bahrani, Ahmed A.
Smith, Charles D.
Wilcock, Donna M.
Gold, Brian T.
Jicha, Gregory A.
author_sort Al-Janabi, Omar M.
collection PubMed
description Subcortical white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in the aging population frequently represent vascular injury that may lead to cognitive impairment. WMH progression is well described, but the factors underlying WMH regression remain poorly understood. A sample of 351 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 (ADNI2) was explored who had WMH volumetric quantification, structural brain measures, and cognitive measures (memory and executive function) at baseline and after approximately 2 years. Selected participants were categorized into three groups based on WMH change over time, including those that demonstrated regression (n = 96; 25.5%), stability (n = 72; 19.1%), and progression (n = 209; 55.4%). There were no significant differences in age, education, sex, or cognitive status between groups. Analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences in atrophy between the progression and both regression (p = 0.004) and stable groups (p = 0.012). Memory assessments improved over time in the regression and stable groups but declined in the progression group (p = 0.003; p = 0.018). WMH regression is associated with decreased brain atrophy and improvement in memory performance over two years compared to those with WMH progression, in whom memory and brain atrophy worsened. These data suggest that WMHs are dynamic and associated with changes in atrophy and cognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6680735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66807352019-08-09 White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups Al-Janabi, Omar M. Bauer, Christopher E. Goldstein, Larry B. Murphy, Richard R. Bahrani, Ahmed A. Smith, Charles D. Wilcock, Donna M. Gold, Brian T. Jicha, Gregory A. Brain Sci Article Subcortical white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in the aging population frequently represent vascular injury that may lead to cognitive impairment. WMH progression is well described, but the factors underlying WMH regression remain poorly understood. A sample of 351 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 (ADNI2) was explored who had WMH volumetric quantification, structural brain measures, and cognitive measures (memory and executive function) at baseline and after approximately 2 years. Selected participants were categorized into three groups based on WMH change over time, including those that demonstrated regression (n = 96; 25.5%), stability (n = 72; 19.1%), and progression (n = 209; 55.4%). There were no significant differences in age, education, sex, or cognitive status between groups. Analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences in atrophy between the progression and both regression (p = 0.004) and stable groups (p = 0.012). Memory assessments improved over time in the regression and stable groups but declined in the progression group (p = 0.003; p = 0.018). WMH regression is associated with decreased brain atrophy and improvement in memory performance over two years compared to those with WMH progression, in whom memory and brain atrophy worsened. These data suggest that WMHs are dynamic and associated with changes in atrophy and cognition. MDPI 2019-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6680735/ /pubmed/31330933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9070170 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Al-Janabi, Omar M.
Bauer, Christopher E.
Goldstein, Larry B.
Murphy, Richard R.
Bahrani, Ahmed A.
Smith, Charles D.
Wilcock, Donna M.
Gold, Brian T.
Jicha, Gregory A.
White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups
title White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups
title_full White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups
title_fullStr White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups
title_full_unstemmed White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups
title_short White Matter Hyperintensity Regression: Comparison of Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Profiles with Progression and Stable Groups
title_sort white matter hyperintensity regression: comparison of brain atrophy and cognitive profiles with progression and stable groups
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6680735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330933
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9070170
work_keys_str_mv AT aljanabiomarm whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT bauerchristophere whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT goldsteinlarryb whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT murphyrichardr whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT bahraniahmeda whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT smithcharlesd whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT wilcockdonnam whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT goldbriant whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups
AT jichagregorya whitematterhyperintensityregressioncomparisonofbrainatrophyandcognitiveprofileswithprogressionandstablegroups