Cargando…

Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal welfare is a current societal concern, and non-invasive indicators are required to assess the welfare state of animals. The selection of horses for certain functions and individual differences could result in different strategies to deal with stressors. This is why in the pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosselot, Paula, Mendonça, Tiago, González, Igor, Tadich, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9070397
_version_ 1783441642929258496
author Rosselot, Paula
Mendonça, Tiago
González, Igor
Tadich, Tamara
author_facet Rosselot, Paula
Mendonça, Tiago
González, Igor
Tadich, Tamara
author_sort Rosselot, Paula
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal welfare is a current societal concern, and non-invasive indicators are required to assess the welfare state of animals. The selection of horses for certain functions and individual differences could result in different strategies to deal with stressors. This is why in the present study we assessed behavioral and physiological responses of two types of horses (working horses and Chilean rodeo horses) to a handling test (bridge test). We evaluated five behaviors, the number of attempts, and the time required to cross a bridge. Heart rate and the variability of heart rate were registered with a polar system during rest and during the bridge test. Chilean rodeo horses displayed several active behaviors in order to avoid the bridge and required a higher number of attempts to complete the task, but physiologically responded better. On the other hand, all working horses crossed the bridge on the first attempt, without refusal behaviors, but physiologically did not respond as well as Chilean rodeo horses. Behavior does not always correlate with physiological data, and needs to be interpreted carefully when assessing horse welfare. ABSTRACT: Non-invasive measures are preferred when assessing animal welfare. Differences in behavioral and physiological responses toward a stressor could be the result of the selection of horses for specific uses. Behavioral and physiological responses of working and Chilean rodeo horses subjected to a handling test were assessed. Five behaviors, number of attempts, and the time to cross a bridge were video recorded and analyzed with the Observer XT software. Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), to assess the physiological response to the novel stimulus, were registered with a Polar Equine V800 heart rate monitor system during rest and the bridge test. Heart rate variability data were obtained with the Kubios software. Differences between working and Chilean rodeo horses were assessed, and within-group differences between rest and the test were also analyzed. Chilean rodeo horses presented more proactive behaviors and required significantly more attempts to cross the bridge than working horses. Physiologically, Chilean rodeo horses presented lower variability of the heart rate than working horses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6681051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66810512019-08-09 Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test Rosselot, Paula Mendonça, Tiago González, Igor Tadich, Tamara Animals (Basel) Communication SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal welfare is a current societal concern, and non-invasive indicators are required to assess the welfare state of animals. The selection of horses for certain functions and individual differences could result in different strategies to deal with stressors. This is why in the present study we assessed behavioral and physiological responses of two types of horses (working horses and Chilean rodeo horses) to a handling test (bridge test). We evaluated five behaviors, the number of attempts, and the time required to cross a bridge. Heart rate and the variability of heart rate were registered with a polar system during rest and during the bridge test. Chilean rodeo horses displayed several active behaviors in order to avoid the bridge and required a higher number of attempts to complete the task, but physiologically responded better. On the other hand, all working horses crossed the bridge on the first attempt, without refusal behaviors, but physiologically did not respond as well as Chilean rodeo horses. Behavior does not always correlate with physiological data, and needs to be interpreted carefully when assessing horse welfare. ABSTRACT: Non-invasive measures are preferred when assessing animal welfare. Differences in behavioral and physiological responses toward a stressor could be the result of the selection of horses for specific uses. Behavioral and physiological responses of working and Chilean rodeo horses subjected to a handling test were assessed. Five behaviors, number of attempts, and the time to cross a bridge were video recorded and analyzed with the Observer XT software. Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), to assess the physiological response to the novel stimulus, were registered with a Polar Equine V800 heart rate monitor system during rest and the bridge test. Heart rate variability data were obtained with the Kubios software. Differences between working and Chilean rodeo horses were assessed, and within-group differences between rest and the test were also analyzed. Chilean rodeo horses presented more proactive behaviors and required significantly more attempts to cross the bridge than working horses. Physiologically, Chilean rodeo horses presented lower variability of the heart rate than working horses. MDPI 2019-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6681051/ /pubmed/31261934 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9070397 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Rosselot, Paula
Mendonça, Tiago
González, Igor
Tadich, Tamara
Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test
title Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test
title_full Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test
title_fullStr Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test
title_short Behavioral and Physiological Differences between Working Horses and Chilean Rodeo Horses in a Handling Test
title_sort behavioral and physiological differences between working horses and chilean rodeo horses in a handling test
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9070397
work_keys_str_mv AT rosselotpaula behavioralandphysiologicaldifferencesbetweenworkinghorsesandchileanrodeohorsesinahandlingtest
AT mendoncatiago behavioralandphysiologicaldifferencesbetweenworkinghorsesandchileanrodeohorsesinahandlingtest
AT gonzalezigor behavioralandphysiologicaldifferencesbetweenworkinghorsesandchileanrodeohorsesinahandlingtest
AT tadichtamara behavioralandphysiologicaldifferencesbetweenworkinghorsesandchileanrodeohorsesinahandlingtest