Cargando…

Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification

The following article highlights the importance of an indispensable process in cellulose fibers (UFC100) modification which may change the biopolymer properties—drying. The reader is provided with a broad range of information considering the drying process consequences on the chemical treatment of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cichosz, Stefan, Masek, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31336791
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11071174
_version_ 1783441657632391168
author Cichosz, Stefan
Masek, Anna
author_facet Cichosz, Stefan
Masek, Anna
author_sort Cichosz, Stefan
collection PubMed
description The following article highlights the importance of an indispensable process in cellulose fibers (UFC100) modification which may change the biopolymer properties—drying. The reader is provided with a broad range of information considering the drying process consequences on the chemical treatment of the cellulose. This research underlines the importance of UFC100 moisture content reduction considering polymer composites application with the employment of a technique different than thermal treating. Therefore, a new hybrid chemical modification approach is introduced. It consists of two steps: solvent exchange (with ethanol either hexane) and chemical treatment (maleic anhydride—MA). With the use of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), it has been proven that the employment of different solvents may contribute to the higher yield of the modification process as they cause rearrangements in hydrogen bonds structure, swell the biopolymer and, therefore, affect its molecular packing. Furthermore, according to the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), the improvement in fibers thermal resistance was noticed, e.g., shift in the value of 5% temperature mass loss from 240 °C (regular modification) to 306 °C (while solvent employed). Moreover, the research was broadened with cellulose moisture content influence on the modification process—tested fibers were either dried (D) or not dried (ND) before the hybrid chemical treatment. According to the gathered data, D cellulose exhibits elevated thermal resistance and ND fibers are more prone to the MA modification. What should be emphasized, in the case of all carried out UFC100 treatments, is that a decrease in moisture contend was evidenced—from approximately 4% in case of thermal drying to 1.7% for hybrid chemical modification. This is incredibly promising considering the possibility of the treated fibers application in polymer matrix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6681115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66811152019-08-09 Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification Cichosz, Stefan Masek, Anna Polymers (Basel) Article The following article highlights the importance of an indispensable process in cellulose fibers (UFC100) modification which may change the biopolymer properties—drying. The reader is provided with a broad range of information considering the drying process consequences on the chemical treatment of the cellulose. This research underlines the importance of UFC100 moisture content reduction considering polymer composites application with the employment of a technique different than thermal treating. Therefore, a new hybrid chemical modification approach is introduced. It consists of two steps: solvent exchange (with ethanol either hexane) and chemical treatment (maleic anhydride—MA). With the use of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), it has been proven that the employment of different solvents may contribute to the higher yield of the modification process as they cause rearrangements in hydrogen bonds structure, swell the biopolymer and, therefore, affect its molecular packing. Furthermore, according to the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), the improvement in fibers thermal resistance was noticed, e.g., shift in the value of 5% temperature mass loss from 240 °C (regular modification) to 306 °C (while solvent employed). Moreover, the research was broadened with cellulose moisture content influence on the modification process—tested fibers were either dried (D) or not dried (ND) before the hybrid chemical treatment. According to the gathered data, D cellulose exhibits elevated thermal resistance and ND fibers are more prone to the MA modification. What should be emphasized, in the case of all carried out UFC100 treatments, is that a decrease in moisture contend was evidenced—from approximately 4% in case of thermal drying to 1.7% for hybrid chemical modification. This is incredibly promising considering the possibility of the treated fibers application in polymer matrix. MDPI 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6681115/ /pubmed/31336791 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11071174 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cichosz, Stefan
Masek, Anna
Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification
title Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification
title_full Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification
title_fullStr Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification
title_full_unstemmed Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification
title_short Cellulose Fibers Hydrophobization via a Hybrid Chemical Modification
title_sort cellulose fibers hydrophobization via a hybrid chemical modification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31336791
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11071174
work_keys_str_mv AT cichoszstefan cellulosefibershydrophobizationviaahybridchemicalmodification
AT masekanna cellulosefibershydrophobizationviaahybridchemicalmodification