Cargando…
Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions
The purpose of this study was to compare the composite, inter-individual, and intra-individual differences in the patterns of responses for electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF) during fatiguing, maximal, bilateral, and isokinetic leg exte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31323817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7070175 |
_version_ | 1783441719773102080 |
---|---|
author | Anders, John Paul V. Smith, Cory M. Keller, Joshua L. Hill, Ethan C. Housh, Terry J. Schmidt, Richard J. Johnson, Glen O. |
author_facet | Anders, John Paul V. Smith, Cory M. Keller, Joshua L. Hill, Ethan C. Housh, Terry J. Schmidt, Richard J. Johnson, Glen O. |
author_sort | Anders, John Paul V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to compare the composite, inter-individual, and intra-individual differences in the patterns of responses for electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF) during fatiguing, maximal, bilateral, and isokinetic leg extension muscle actions. Thirteen recreationally active men (age = 21.7 ± 2.6 years; body mass = 79.8 ± 11.5 kg; height = 174.2 ± 12.7 cm) performed maximal, bilateral leg extensions at 180°·s(−1) until the torque values dropped to 50% of peak torque for two consecutive repetitions. The EMG and MMG signals from the vastus lateralis (VL) muscles of both limbs were recorded. Four 2(Leg) × 19(time) repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to examine mean differences for EMG AMP, EMG MPF, MMG AMP, and MMG MPF between limbs, and polynomial regression analyses were performed to identify the patterns of neuromuscular responses. The results indicated no significant differences between limbs for EMG AMP (p = 0.44), EMG MPF (p = 0.33), MMG AMP (p = 0.89), or MMG MPF (p = 0.52). Polynomial regression analyses demonstrated substantial inter-individual variability. Inferences made regarding the patterns of neuromuscular responses to fatiguing and bilateral muscle actions should be considered on a subject-by-subject basis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6681382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66813822019-08-09 Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions Anders, John Paul V. Smith, Cory M. Keller, Joshua L. Hill, Ethan C. Housh, Terry J. Schmidt, Richard J. Johnson, Glen O. Sports (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to compare the composite, inter-individual, and intra-individual differences in the patterns of responses for electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF) during fatiguing, maximal, bilateral, and isokinetic leg extension muscle actions. Thirteen recreationally active men (age = 21.7 ± 2.6 years; body mass = 79.8 ± 11.5 kg; height = 174.2 ± 12.7 cm) performed maximal, bilateral leg extensions at 180°·s(−1) until the torque values dropped to 50% of peak torque for two consecutive repetitions. The EMG and MMG signals from the vastus lateralis (VL) muscles of both limbs were recorded. Four 2(Leg) × 19(time) repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to examine mean differences for EMG AMP, EMG MPF, MMG AMP, and MMG MPF between limbs, and polynomial regression analyses were performed to identify the patterns of neuromuscular responses. The results indicated no significant differences between limbs for EMG AMP (p = 0.44), EMG MPF (p = 0.33), MMG AMP (p = 0.89), or MMG MPF (p = 0.52). Polynomial regression analyses demonstrated substantial inter-individual variability. Inferences made regarding the patterns of neuromuscular responses to fatiguing and bilateral muscle actions should be considered on a subject-by-subject basis. MDPI 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6681382/ /pubmed/31323817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7070175 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Anders, John Paul V. Smith, Cory M. Keller, Joshua L. Hill, Ethan C. Housh, Terry J. Schmidt, Richard J. Johnson, Glen O. Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions |
title | Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions |
title_full | Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions |
title_fullStr | Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions |
title_short | Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions |
title_sort | inter- and intra-individual differences in emg and mmg during maximal, bilateral, dynamic leg extensions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31323817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7070175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersjohnpaulv interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions AT smithcorym interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions AT kellerjoshual interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions AT hillethanc interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions AT houshterryj interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions AT schmidtrichardj interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions AT johnsongleno interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions |