Cargando…

Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions

The purpose of this study was to compare the composite, inter-individual, and intra-individual differences in the patterns of responses for electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF) during fatiguing, maximal, bilateral, and isokinetic leg exte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anders, John Paul V., Smith, Cory M., Keller, Joshua L., Hill, Ethan C., Housh, Terry J., Schmidt, Richard J., Johnson, Glen O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31323817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7070175
_version_ 1783441719773102080
author Anders, John Paul V.
Smith, Cory M.
Keller, Joshua L.
Hill, Ethan C.
Housh, Terry J.
Schmidt, Richard J.
Johnson, Glen O.
author_facet Anders, John Paul V.
Smith, Cory M.
Keller, Joshua L.
Hill, Ethan C.
Housh, Terry J.
Schmidt, Richard J.
Johnson, Glen O.
author_sort Anders, John Paul V.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the composite, inter-individual, and intra-individual differences in the patterns of responses for electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF) during fatiguing, maximal, bilateral, and isokinetic leg extension muscle actions. Thirteen recreationally active men (age = 21.7 ± 2.6 years; body mass = 79.8 ± 11.5 kg; height = 174.2 ± 12.7 cm) performed maximal, bilateral leg extensions at 180°·s(−1) until the torque values dropped to 50% of peak torque for two consecutive repetitions. The EMG and MMG signals from the vastus lateralis (VL) muscles of both limbs were recorded. Four 2(Leg) × 19(time) repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to examine mean differences for EMG AMP, EMG MPF, MMG AMP, and MMG MPF between limbs, and polynomial regression analyses were performed to identify the patterns of neuromuscular responses. The results indicated no significant differences between limbs for EMG AMP (p = 0.44), EMG MPF (p = 0.33), MMG AMP (p = 0.89), or MMG MPF (p = 0.52). Polynomial regression analyses demonstrated substantial inter-individual variability. Inferences made regarding the patterns of neuromuscular responses to fatiguing and bilateral muscle actions should be considered on a subject-by-subject basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6681382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66813822019-08-09 Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions Anders, John Paul V. Smith, Cory M. Keller, Joshua L. Hill, Ethan C. Housh, Terry J. Schmidt, Richard J. Johnson, Glen O. Sports (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to compare the composite, inter-individual, and intra-individual differences in the patterns of responses for electromyographic (EMG) and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude (AMP) and mean power frequency (MPF) during fatiguing, maximal, bilateral, and isokinetic leg extension muscle actions. Thirteen recreationally active men (age = 21.7 ± 2.6 years; body mass = 79.8 ± 11.5 kg; height = 174.2 ± 12.7 cm) performed maximal, bilateral leg extensions at 180°·s(−1) until the torque values dropped to 50% of peak torque for two consecutive repetitions. The EMG and MMG signals from the vastus lateralis (VL) muscles of both limbs were recorded. Four 2(Leg) × 19(time) repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to examine mean differences for EMG AMP, EMG MPF, MMG AMP, and MMG MPF between limbs, and polynomial regression analyses were performed to identify the patterns of neuromuscular responses. The results indicated no significant differences between limbs for EMG AMP (p = 0.44), EMG MPF (p = 0.33), MMG AMP (p = 0.89), or MMG MPF (p = 0.52). Polynomial regression analyses demonstrated substantial inter-individual variability. Inferences made regarding the patterns of neuromuscular responses to fatiguing and bilateral muscle actions should be considered on a subject-by-subject basis. MDPI 2019-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6681382/ /pubmed/31323817 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7070175 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Anders, John Paul V.
Smith, Cory M.
Keller, Joshua L.
Hill, Ethan C.
Housh, Terry J.
Schmidt, Richard J.
Johnson, Glen O.
Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions
title Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions
title_full Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions
title_fullStr Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions
title_full_unstemmed Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions
title_short Inter- and Intra-Individual Differences in EMG and MMG during Maximal, Bilateral, Dynamic Leg Extensions
title_sort inter- and intra-individual differences in emg and mmg during maximal, bilateral, dynamic leg extensions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31323817
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7070175
work_keys_str_mv AT andersjohnpaulv interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions
AT smithcorym interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions
AT kellerjoshual interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions
AT hillethanc interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions
AT houshterryj interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions
AT schmidtrichardj interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions
AT johnsongleno interandintraindividualdifferencesinemgandmmgduringmaximalbilateraldynamiclegextensions