Cargando…

Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters

Waste rice straw (RS) is generated in massive quantities around the world and is often burned, creating greenhouse gas and air quality problems. Anaerobic digestion (AD) may be a better option for RS management, but RS is presumed to be comparatively refractory under anaerobic conditions without pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zealand, Andrew M., Mei, Ran, Roskilly, Anthony P., Liu, WenTso, Graham, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31233284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13438
_version_ 1783441723437875200
author Zealand, Andrew M.
Mei, Ran
Roskilly, Anthony P.
Liu, WenTso
Graham, David W.
author_facet Zealand, Andrew M.
Mei, Ran
Roskilly, Anthony P.
Liu, WenTso
Graham, David W.
author_sort Zealand, Andrew M.
collection PubMed
description Waste rice straw (RS) is generated in massive quantities around the world and is often burned, creating greenhouse gas and air quality problems. Anaerobic digestion (AD) may be a better option for RS management, but RS is presumed to be comparatively refractory under anaerobic conditions without pre‐treatment or co‐substrates. However, this presumption assumes frequent reactor feeding regimes but less frequent feeding may be better for RS due to slow hydrolysis rates. Here, we assess how feeding frequency (FF) and organic loading rate (OLR) impacts microbial communities and biogas production in RS AD reactors. Using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and bioinformatics, microbial communities from five bench‐scale bioreactors were characterized. At low OLR (1.0 g VS l(−1) day(−1)), infrequently fed units (once every 21 days) had higher specific biogas yields than more frequent feeding (five in 7 days), although microbial community diversities were statistically similar (P > 0.05; ANOVA with Tukey comparison). In contrast, an increase in OLR to 2.0 g VS l(−1) day(−1) significantly changed Archaeal and fermenting Eubacterial sub‐communities and the least frequency fed reactors failed. ‘Stable’ reactors were dominated by Methanobacterium, Methanosarcina and diverse Bacteroidetes, whereas ‘failed’ reactors saw shifts towards Clostridia and Christensenellaceae among fermenters and reduced methanogen abundances. Overall, OLR impacted RS AD microbial communities more than FF. However, combining infrequent feeding and lower OLRs may be better for RS AD because of higher specific yields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6681398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66813982019-08-12 Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters Zealand, Andrew M. Mei, Ran Roskilly, Anthony P. Liu, WenTso Graham, David W. Microb Biotechnol Research Articles Waste rice straw (RS) is generated in massive quantities around the world and is often burned, creating greenhouse gas and air quality problems. Anaerobic digestion (AD) may be a better option for RS management, but RS is presumed to be comparatively refractory under anaerobic conditions without pre‐treatment or co‐substrates. However, this presumption assumes frequent reactor feeding regimes but less frequent feeding may be better for RS due to slow hydrolysis rates. Here, we assess how feeding frequency (FF) and organic loading rate (OLR) impacts microbial communities and biogas production in RS AD reactors. Using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and bioinformatics, microbial communities from five bench‐scale bioreactors were characterized. At low OLR (1.0 g VS l(−1) day(−1)), infrequently fed units (once every 21 days) had higher specific biogas yields than more frequent feeding (five in 7 days), although microbial community diversities were statistically similar (P > 0.05; ANOVA with Tukey comparison). In contrast, an increase in OLR to 2.0 g VS l(−1) day(−1) significantly changed Archaeal and fermenting Eubacterial sub‐communities and the least frequency fed reactors failed. ‘Stable’ reactors were dominated by Methanobacterium, Methanosarcina and diverse Bacteroidetes, whereas ‘failed’ reactors saw shifts towards Clostridia and Christensenellaceae among fermenters and reduced methanogen abundances. Overall, OLR impacted RS AD microbial communities more than FF. However, combining infrequent feeding and lower OLRs may be better for RS AD because of higher specific yields. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6681398/ /pubmed/31233284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13438 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Zealand, Andrew M.
Mei, Ran
Roskilly, Anthony P.
Liu, WenTso
Graham, David W.
Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters
title Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters
title_full Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters
title_fullStr Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters
title_full_unstemmed Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters
title_short Molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters
title_sort molecular microbial ecology of stable versus failing rice straw anaerobic digesters
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31233284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13438
work_keys_str_mv AT zealandandrewm molecularmicrobialecologyofstableversusfailingricestrawanaerobicdigesters
AT meiran molecularmicrobialecologyofstableversusfailingricestrawanaerobicdigesters
AT roskillyanthonyp molecularmicrobialecologyofstableversusfailingricestrawanaerobicdigesters
AT liuwentso molecularmicrobialecologyofstableversusfailingricestrawanaerobicdigesters
AT grahamdavidw molecularmicrobialecologyofstableversusfailingricestrawanaerobicdigesters