Cargando…
Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) could be carried out by means of antiarrhythmic drugs; however this strategy has not received any endorsement because these drugs are burdened by a high risk of proarrhythmic events (flecainide, sotalol) or extracardiac effects (amiodarone...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413779 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr909 |
_version_ | 1783441781535277056 |
---|---|
author | De Vecchis, Renato Paccone, Andrea Di Maio, Marco |
author_facet | De Vecchis, Renato Paccone, Andrea Di Maio, Marco |
author_sort | De Vecchis, Renato |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) could be carried out by means of antiarrhythmic drugs; however this strategy has not received any endorsement because these drugs are burdened by a high risk of proarrhythmic events (flecainide, sotalol) or extracardiac effects (amiodarone). METHODS: In our retrospective cohort study we have compared amiodarone 200 mg per day with the strategy implying the renunciation of any specific drug as well as with the approach using oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban) or a combined approach including amiodarone plus rivaroxaban. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients with a history of AF (paroxysmal, persistent or long-lasting persistent) successfully treated with achievement of sinus rhythm have been gathered. Amiodarone has been the most effective option for AF secondary prevention, with regard to the recurrences of AF as well as rehospitalizations: P (Kruskal-Wallis test) < 0.05 for both, over a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients kept free from any specific drug therapy have been shown to experience more numerous AF relapses and related rehospitalizations. On the contrary, the amiodarone use has been associated with a decreased risk of AF recurrences and hospital admissions. Thus, amiodarone might be an efficacious tool for realizing a successful long-term AF secondary prevention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6681845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66818452019-08-14 Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study De Vecchis, Renato Paccone, Andrea Di Maio, Marco Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) could be carried out by means of antiarrhythmic drugs; however this strategy has not received any endorsement because these drugs are burdened by a high risk of proarrhythmic events (flecainide, sotalol) or extracardiac effects (amiodarone). METHODS: In our retrospective cohort study we have compared amiodarone 200 mg per day with the strategy implying the renunciation of any specific drug as well as with the approach using oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban) or a combined approach including amiodarone plus rivaroxaban. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients with a history of AF (paroxysmal, persistent or long-lasting persistent) successfully treated with achievement of sinus rhythm have been gathered. Amiodarone has been the most effective option for AF secondary prevention, with regard to the recurrences of AF as well as rehospitalizations: P (Kruskal-Wallis test) < 0.05 for both, over a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients kept free from any specific drug therapy have been shown to experience more numerous AF relapses and related rehospitalizations. On the contrary, the amiodarone use has been associated with a decreased risk of AF recurrences and hospital admissions. Thus, amiodarone might be an efficacious tool for realizing a successful long-term AF secondary prevention. Elmer Press 2019-08 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6681845/ /pubmed/31413779 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr909 Text en Copyright 2019, De Vecchis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article De Vecchis, Renato Paccone, Andrea Di Maio, Marco Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | secondary prevention of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413779 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devecchisrenato secondarypreventionofnonvalvularatrialfibrillationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT pacconeandrea secondarypreventionofnonvalvularatrialfibrillationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT dimaiomarco secondarypreventionofnonvalvularatrialfibrillationaretrospectivecohortstudy |