Cargando…

Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) could be carried out by means of antiarrhythmic drugs; however this strategy has not received any endorsement because these drugs are burdened by a high risk of proarrhythmic events (flecainide, sotalol) or extracardiac effects (amiodarone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Vecchis, Renato, Paccone, Andrea, Di Maio, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413779
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr909
_version_ 1783441781535277056
author De Vecchis, Renato
Paccone, Andrea
Di Maio, Marco
author_facet De Vecchis, Renato
Paccone, Andrea
Di Maio, Marco
author_sort De Vecchis, Renato
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) could be carried out by means of antiarrhythmic drugs; however this strategy has not received any endorsement because these drugs are burdened by a high risk of proarrhythmic events (flecainide, sotalol) or extracardiac effects (amiodarone). METHODS: In our retrospective cohort study we have compared amiodarone 200 mg per day with the strategy implying the renunciation of any specific drug as well as with the approach using oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban) or a combined approach including amiodarone plus rivaroxaban. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients with a history of AF (paroxysmal, persistent or long-lasting persistent) successfully treated with achievement of sinus rhythm have been gathered. Amiodarone has been the most effective option for AF secondary prevention, with regard to the recurrences of AF as well as rehospitalizations: P (Kruskal-Wallis test) < 0.05 for both, over a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients kept free from any specific drug therapy have been shown to experience more numerous AF relapses and related rehospitalizations. On the contrary, the amiodarone use has been associated with a decreased risk of AF recurrences and hospital admissions. Thus, amiodarone might be an efficacious tool for realizing a successful long-term AF secondary prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6681845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66818452019-08-14 Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study De Vecchis, Renato Paccone, Andrea Di Maio, Marco Cardiol Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) could be carried out by means of antiarrhythmic drugs; however this strategy has not received any endorsement because these drugs are burdened by a high risk of proarrhythmic events (flecainide, sotalol) or extracardiac effects (amiodarone). METHODS: In our retrospective cohort study we have compared amiodarone 200 mg per day with the strategy implying the renunciation of any specific drug as well as with the approach using oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban) or a combined approach including amiodarone plus rivaroxaban. RESULTS: A total of 255 patients with a history of AF (paroxysmal, persistent or long-lasting persistent) successfully treated with achievement of sinus rhythm have been gathered. Amiodarone has been the most effective option for AF secondary prevention, with regard to the recurrences of AF as well as rehospitalizations: P (Kruskal-Wallis test) < 0.05 for both, over a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients kept free from any specific drug therapy have been shown to experience more numerous AF relapses and related rehospitalizations. On the contrary, the amiodarone use has been associated with a decreased risk of AF recurrences and hospital admissions. Thus, amiodarone might be an efficacious tool for realizing a successful long-term AF secondary prevention. Elmer Press 2019-08 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6681845/ /pubmed/31413779 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr909 Text en Copyright 2019, De Vecchis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
De Vecchis, Renato
Paccone, Andrea
Di Maio, Marco
Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Secondary Prevention of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort secondary prevention of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413779
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr909
work_keys_str_mv AT devecchisrenato secondarypreventionofnonvalvularatrialfibrillationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pacconeandrea secondarypreventionofnonvalvularatrialfibrillationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dimaiomarco secondarypreventionofnonvalvularatrialfibrillationaretrospectivecohortstudy