Cargando…

Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients

BACKGROUND: This study was a proof of concept of a novel means to evaluate microcirculatory changes during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. It sought to examine the distributive circulatory effects of spinal anesthesia and evaluate the impact of phenylephrine administration on the microcircu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Ronald B., Boyd, Colin, McKeen, Dolores, Abdo, Islam Saleh, Lehmann, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413765
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3778
_version_ 1783441784148328448
author George, Ronald B.
Boyd, Colin
McKeen, Dolores
Abdo, Islam Saleh
Lehmann, Christian
author_facet George, Ronald B.
Boyd, Colin
McKeen, Dolores
Abdo, Islam Saleh
Lehmann, Christian
author_sort George, Ronald B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was a proof of concept of a novel means to evaluate microcirculatory changes during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. It sought to examine the distributive circulatory effects of spinal anesthesia and evaluate the impact of phenylephrine administration on the microcirculation of these women. METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, healthy, non-laboring pregnant women with singleton, term pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either phenylephrine infusion or phenylephrine bolus. Spinal anesthesia was standardized. A sidestream dark-field (SDF) MicroScan(®) video microscope was applied to the sublingual mucosa to obtain microcirculation videos in five different visual fields. Videos were made before and after spinal anesthesia. The resultant videos were analyzed randomly and blindly. The mean microvascular flow index (MFI) values were compared before and after spinal anesthesia. The difference in MFI following spinal anesthesia was compared between phenylephrine infusion and bolus groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were recruited for the study; 22 patients had complete video sets for analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, including preoperative hemodynamics. There were no significant differences between pre- and post-spinal MFI. The post-spinal MFI within the infusion group (mean ± standard deviation: 2.74 ± 0.21) was not significantly different from the bolus group (2.56 ± 0.42, P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Despite theoretical physiological implications of spinal anesthesia and phenylephrine on the microcirculation, significant alteration of the MFI was not observed between pre- and post-spinal anesthesia (within group). Additionally, despite an eight-fold larger phenylephrine dose for continuous infusion prophylaxis used in this group of women, this did not result in a significant alteration of the microcirculation compared to those who received phenylephrine treatment for hypotension (between groups).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6681856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66818562019-08-14 Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients George, Ronald B. Boyd, Colin McKeen, Dolores Abdo, Islam Saleh Lehmann, Christian J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was a proof of concept of a novel means to evaluate microcirculatory changes during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. It sought to examine the distributive circulatory effects of spinal anesthesia and evaluate the impact of phenylephrine administration on the microcirculation of these women. METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval, healthy, non-laboring pregnant women with singleton, term pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either phenylephrine infusion or phenylephrine bolus. Spinal anesthesia was standardized. A sidestream dark-field (SDF) MicroScan(®) video microscope was applied to the sublingual mucosa to obtain microcirculation videos in five different visual fields. Videos were made before and after spinal anesthesia. The resultant videos were analyzed randomly and blindly. The mean microvascular flow index (MFI) values were compared before and after spinal anesthesia. The difference in MFI following spinal anesthesia was compared between phenylephrine infusion and bolus groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were recruited for the study; 22 patients had complete video sets for analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, including preoperative hemodynamics. There were no significant differences between pre- and post-spinal MFI. The post-spinal MFI within the infusion group (mean ± standard deviation: 2.74 ± 0.21) was not significantly different from the bolus group (2.56 ± 0.42, P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Despite theoretical physiological implications of spinal anesthesia and phenylephrine on the microcirculation, significant alteration of the MFI was not observed between pre- and post-spinal anesthesia (within group). Additionally, despite an eight-fold larger phenylephrine dose for continuous infusion prophylaxis used in this group of women, this did not result in a significant alteration of the microcirculation compared to those who received phenylephrine treatment for hypotension (between groups). Elmer Press 2019-08 2019-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6681856/ /pubmed/31413765 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3778 Text en Copyright 2019, George et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
George, Ronald B.
Boyd, Colin
McKeen, Dolores
Abdo, Islam Saleh
Lehmann, Christian
Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients
title Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients
title_full Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients
title_fullStr Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients
title_full_unstemmed Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients
title_short Possible Impact of Spinal Anesthesia and Phenylephrine on Sublingual Microcirculation of Cesarean Delivery Patients
title_sort possible impact of spinal anesthesia and phenylephrine on sublingual microcirculation of cesarean delivery patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413765
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3778
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeronaldb possibleimpactofspinalanesthesiaandphenylephrineonsublingualmicrocirculationofcesareandeliverypatients
AT boydcolin possibleimpactofspinalanesthesiaandphenylephrineonsublingualmicrocirculationofcesareandeliverypatients
AT mckeendolores possibleimpactofspinalanesthesiaandphenylephrineonsublingualmicrocirculationofcesareandeliverypatients
AT abdoislamsaleh possibleimpactofspinalanesthesiaandphenylephrineonsublingualmicrocirculationofcesareandeliverypatients
AT lehmannchristian possibleimpactofspinalanesthesiaandphenylephrineonsublingualmicrocirculationofcesareandeliverypatients