Cargando…

Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: One of the essential elements of a strategic approach to improving patients’ experience is to measure and report on patients’ experiences in real time. Real-time feedback (RTF) is increasingly being collected using digital technology; however, there are several factors that may influence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanbhai, Mustafa, Flott, Kelsey, Darzi, Ara, Mayer, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344680
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9076
_version_ 1783441863610466304
author Khanbhai, Mustafa
Flott, Kelsey
Darzi, Ara
Mayer, Erik
author_facet Khanbhai, Mustafa
Flott, Kelsey
Darzi, Ara
Mayer, Erik
author_sort Khanbhai, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the essential elements of a strategic approach to improving patients’ experience is to measure and report on patients’ experiences in real time. Real-time feedback (RTF) is increasingly being collected using digital technology; however, there are several factors that may influence the success of the digital system. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the digital maturity and patient acceptability of real-time patient experience feedback systems. METHODS: We systematically searched the following databases to identify papers that used digital systems to collect RTF: The Cochrane Library, Global Health, Health Management Information Consortium, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL. In addition, Google Scholar and gray literature were utilized. Studies were assessed on their digital maturity using a Digital Maturity Framework on the basis of the following 4 domains: capacity/resource, usage, interoperability, and impact. A total score of 4 indicated the highest level of digital maturity. RESULTS: RTF was collected primarily using touchscreens, tablets, and Web-based platforms. Implementation of digital systems showed acceptable response rates and generally positive views from patients and staff. Patient demographics according to RTF responses varied. An overrepresentation existed in females with a white predominance and in patients aged ≥65 years. Of 13 eligible studies, none had digital systems that were deemed to be of the highest level of maturity. Three studies received a score of 3, 2, and 1, respectively. Four studies scored 0 points. While 7 studies demonstrated capacity/resource, 8 demonstrated impact. None of the studies demonstrated interoperability in their digital systems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and staff alike are willing to engage in RTF delivered using digital technology, thereby disrupting previous paper-based feedback. However, a lack of emphasis on digital maturity may lead to ineffective RTF, thwarting improvement efforts. Therefore, given the potential benefits of RTF, health care services should ensure that their digital systems deliver across the digital maturity continuum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6682271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66822712019-09-23 Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review Khanbhai, Mustafa Flott, Kelsey Darzi, Ara Mayer, Erik J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: One of the essential elements of a strategic approach to improving patients’ experience is to measure and report on patients’ experiences in real time. Real-time feedback (RTF) is increasingly being collected using digital technology; however, there are several factors that may influence the success of the digital system. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the digital maturity and patient acceptability of real-time patient experience feedback systems. METHODS: We systematically searched the following databases to identify papers that used digital systems to collect RTF: The Cochrane Library, Global Health, Health Management Information Consortium, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL. In addition, Google Scholar and gray literature were utilized. Studies were assessed on their digital maturity using a Digital Maturity Framework on the basis of the following 4 domains: capacity/resource, usage, interoperability, and impact. A total score of 4 indicated the highest level of digital maturity. RESULTS: RTF was collected primarily using touchscreens, tablets, and Web-based platforms. Implementation of digital systems showed acceptable response rates and generally positive views from patients and staff. Patient demographics according to RTF responses varied. An overrepresentation existed in females with a white predominance and in patients aged ≥65 years. Of 13 eligible studies, none had digital systems that were deemed to be of the highest level of maturity. Three studies received a score of 3, 2, and 1, respectively. Four studies scored 0 points. While 7 studies demonstrated capacity/resource, 8 demonstrated impact. None of the studies demonstrated interoperability in their digital systems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and staff alike are willing to engage in RTF delivered using digital technology, thereby disrupting previous paper-based feedback. However, a lack of emphasis on digital maturity may lead to ineffective RTF, thwarting improvement efforts. Therefore, given the potential benefits of RTF, health care services should ensure that their digital systems deliver across the digital maturity continuum. JMIR Publications 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6682271/ /pubmed/31344680 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9076 Text en ©Mustafa Khanbhai, Kelsey Flott, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.01.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Khanbhai, Mustafa
Flott, Kelsey
Darzi, Ara
Mayer, Erik
Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review
title Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review
title_full Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review
title_short Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review
title_sort evaluating digital maturity and patient acceptability of real-time patient experience feedback systems: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344680
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9076
work_keys_str_mv AT khanbhaimustafa evaluatingdigitalmaturityandpatientacceptabilityofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbacksystemssystematicreview
AT flottkelsey evaluatingdigitalmaturityandpatientacceptabilityofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbacksystemssystematicreview
AT darziara evaluatingdigitalmaturityandpatientacceptabilityofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbacksystemssystematicreview
AT mayererik evaluatingdigitalmaturityandpatientacceptabilityofrealtimepatientexperiencefeedbacksystemssystematicreview