Cargando…
Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT bet...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009 |
_version_ | 1783441875586252800 |
---|---|
author | Imano, Nobuki Wadasaki, Koichi Nishibuchi, Ikuno Nagata, Yasushi |
author_facet | Imano, Nobuki Wadasaki, Koichi Nishibuchi, Ikuno Nagata, Yasushi |
author_sort | Imano, Nobuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT between April 2008 and April 2014 were included in this study. In total 58 patients were assessed. The first 38 patients received ICBT with the 2D treatment plan (the 2D group), and the remaining 20 patients received CT-based IGBT (the IGBT group). The dose of point A tended to be lower in the IGBT group (mean value, 60.6 Gy vs. 62.5 Gy; p = .07), though the minimum dose to the 90% (D90) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was equivalent in both groups (mean value, 66.0 Gy vs. 66.2 Gy; p = .91). The rectum minimum dose to 2 cc (D2cc) was significantly lower in the IGBT group than in the 2D group (mean value, 61.2 Gy vs. 69.1 Gy; p = .001). With a median follow-up time of 60 months, the 5-year local control rates (LCRs) of the IGBT group and 2D group were 100% and 83%, respectively (p = .12). The 5-year incidence of rectal complications in the IGBT group and the 2D group were 11% and 29%, respectively (p = .26). Our study showed favorable LCR and preferred incidence of rectal complications in patients treated with CT-based IGBT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6682327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66823272019-08-12 Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer Imano, Nobuki Wadasaki, Koichi Nishibuchi, Ikuno Nagata, Yasushi Gynecol Oncol Rep Survey Article This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT between April 2008 and April 2014 were included in this study. In total 58 patients were assessed. The first 38 patients received ICBT with the 2D treatment plan (the 2D group), and the remaining 20 patients received CT-based IGBT (the IGBT group). The dose of point A tended to be lower in the IGBT group (mean value, 60.6 Gy vs. 62.5 Gy; p = .07), though the minimum dose to the 90% (D90) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was equivalent in both groups (mean value, 66.0 Gy vs. 66.2 Gy; p = .91). The rectum minimum dose to 2 cc (D2cc) was significantly lower in the IGBT group than in the 2D group (mean value, 61.2 Gy vs. 69.1 Gy; p = .001). With a median follow-up time of 60 months, the 5-year local control rates (LCRs) of the IGBT group and 2D group were 100% and 83%, respectively (p = .12). The 5-year incidence of rectal complications in the IGBT group and the 2D group were 11% and 29%, respectively (p = .26). Our study showed favorable LCR and preferred incidence of rectal complications in patients treated with CT-based IGBT. Elsevier 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6682327/ /pubmed/31406912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Survey Article Imano, Nobuki Wadasaki, Koichi Nishibuchi, Ikuno Nagata, Yasushi Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title | Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_full | Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_short | Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_sort | comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
topic | Survey Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imanonobuki comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer AT wadasakikoichi comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer AT nishibuchiikuno comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer AT nagatayasushi comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer |