Cargando…

Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer

This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imano, Nobuki, Wadasaki, Koichi, Nishibuchi, Ikuno, Nagata, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009
_version_ 1783441875586252800
author Imano, Nobuki
Wadasaki, Koichi
Nishibuchi, Ikuno
Nagata, Yasushi
author_facet Imano, Nobuki
Wadasaki, Koichi
Nishibuchi, Ikuno
Nagata, Yasushi
author_sort Imano, Nobuki
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT between April 2008 and April 2014 were included in this study. In total 58 patients were assessed. The first 38 patients received ICBT with the 2D treatment plan (the 2D group), and the remaining 20 patients received CT-based IGBT (the IGBT group). The dose of point A tended to be lower in the IGBT group (mean value, 60.6 Gy vs. 62.5 Gy; p = .07), though the minimum dose to the 90% (D90) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was equivalent in both groups (mean value, 66.0 Gy vs. 66.2 Gy; p = .91). The rectum minimum dose to 2 cc (D2cc) was significantly lower in the IGBT group than in the 2D group (mean value, 61.2 Gy vs. 69.1 Gy; p = .001). With a median follow-up time of 60 months, the 5-year local control rates (LCRs) of the IGBT group and 2D group were 100% and 83%, respectively (p = .12). The 5-year incidence of rectal complications in the IGBT group and the 2D group were 11% and 29%, respectively (p = .26). Our study showed favorable LCR and preferred incidence of rectal complications in patients treated with CT-based IGBT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6682327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66823272019-08-12 Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer Imano, Nobuki Wadasaki, Koichi Nishibuchi, Ikuno Nagata, Yasushi Gynecol Oncol Rep Survey Article This study aimed to analyze the clinical results of radiotherapy for cervical cancer using two-dimensional (2D) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) at our institution. Patients with stage IB–IVA cervical cancer who received ICBT between April 2008 and April 2014 were included in this study. In total 58 patients were assessed. The first 38 patients received ICBT with the 2D treatment plan (the 2D group), and the remaining 20 patients received CT-based IGBT (the IGBT group). The dose of point A tended to be lower in the IGBT group (mean value, 60.6 Gy vs. 62.5 Gy; p = .07), though the minimum dose to the 90% (D90) of the clinical target volume (CTV) was equivalent in both groups (mean value, 66.0 Gy vs. 66.2 Gy; p = .91). The rectum minimum dose to 2 cc (D2cc) was significantly lower in the IGBT group than in the 2D group (mean value, 61.2 Gy vs. 69.1 Gy; p = .001). With a median follow-up time of 60 months, the 5-year local control rates (LCRs) of the IGBT group and 2D group were 100% and 83%, respectively (p = .12). The 5-year incidence of rectal complications in the IGBT group and the 2D group were 11% and 29%, respectively (p = .26). Our study showed favorable LCR and preferred incidence of rectal complications in patients treated with CT-based IGBT. Elsevier 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6682327/ /pubmed/31406912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Survey Article
Imano, Nobuki
Wadasaki, Koichi
Nishibuchi, Ikuno
Nagata, Yasushi
Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_full Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_short Comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_sort comparison of clinical outcome between computed tomography-based image-guided brachytherapy and two-dimensional-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer
topic Survey Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.07.009
work_keys_str_mv AT imanonobuki comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer
AT wadasakikoichi comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer
AT nishibuchiikuno comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer
AT nagatayasushi comparisonofclinicaloutcomebetweencomputedtomographybasedimageguidedbrachytherapyandtwodimensionalbasedbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer