Cargando…
Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
Introduction Patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast often experience radiation dermatitis ranging from mild erythema to moist desquamation. In post-lumpectomy patients, the axilla and inframammary fold are at an increased risk for friction dermatitis. Dermatitis can impact patients’...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4807 |
_version_ | 1783441887563087872 |
---|---|
author | Lam, Andrew CL Yu, Edward Vanwynsberghe, Danielle O'Neil, Melissa D'Souza, David Cao, Jeffrey Lock, Michael |
author_facet | Lam, Andrew CL Yu, Edward Vanwynsberghe, Danielle O'Neil, Melissa D'Souza, David Cao, Jeffrey Lock, Michael |
author_sort | Lam, Andrew CL |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast often experience radiation dermatitis ranging from mild erythema to moist desquamation. In post-lumpectomy patients, the axilla and inframammary fold are at an increased risk for friction dermatitis. Dermatitis can impact patients’ quality-of-life and may require treatment break/cessation. Our objectives are to assess the efficacy of 3M Cavilon Barrier Film (BF) in preventing and/or delaying the onset of grade-two dermatitis and reducing patient-reported sensation scores. Methods A total of 55 patients were randomized to receive BF on the medial or lateral breast. BF was applied twice weekly during treatment. Skin toxicity was evaluated weekly by a blinded clinical investigator using the Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT) and the modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Visual Assessment Score (RTOG VAS). On day one, baseline photographs were taken; seven-to-ten days post-treatment, patients returned for photographs, the STAT/RTOG VAS, and patient-opinion questions in the form of the global questionnaire. Results The paired analysis found BF did not significantly reduce dermatitis either during or post-treatment. However, the unpaired analysis found significantly reduced RTOG VAS on the lateral compartment during treatment (BF:0.91 vs. Control:1.21, p = 0.0408). This difference resolved post-treatment. Additionally, BF was able to reduce pruritus (p = 0.047) on the medial components and burning sensations on the lateral components (p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between the time-to-onset or proportion of patients who developed grade-two dermatitis. Conclusion In an unpaired analysis, BF significantly reduced dermatitis on the lateral compartment during treatment. Additionally, BF significantly reduced pruritus and burning sensations. A larger study using a more reliable scoring method is required to clarify the effect of BF on radiation-associated skin toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6682394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66823942019-08-09 Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Lam, Andrew CL Yu, Edward Vanwynsberghe, Danielle O'Neil, Melissa D'Souza, David Cao, Jeffrey Lock, Michael Cureus Radiation Oncology Introduction Patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast often experience radiation dermatitis ranging from mild erythema to moist desquamation. In post-lumpectomy patients, the axilla and inframammary fold are at an increased risk for friction dermatitis. Dermatitis can impact patients’ quality-of-life and may require treatment break/cessation. Our objectives are to assess the efficacy of 3M Cavilon Barrier Film (BF) in preventing and/or delaying the onset of grade-two dermatitis and reducing patient-reported sensation scores. Methods A total of 55 patients were randomized to receive BF on the medial or lateral breast. BF was applied twice weekly during treatment. Skin toxicity was evaluated weekly by a blinded clinical investigator using the Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT) and the modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Visual Assessment Score (RTOG VAS). On day one, baseline photographs were taken; seven-to-ten days post-treatment, patients returned for photographs, the STAT/RTOG VAS, and patient-opinion questions in the form of the global questionnaire. Results The paired analysis found BF did not significantly reduce dermatitis either during or post-treatment. However, the unpaired analysis found significantly reduced RTOG VAS on the lateral compartment during treatment (BF:0.91 vs. Control:1.21, p = 0.0408). This difference resolved post-treatment. Additionally, BF was able to reduce pruritus (p = 0.047) on the medial components and burning sensations on the lateral components (p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between the time-to-onset or proportion of patients who developed grade-two dermatitis. Conclusion In an unpaired analysis, BF significantly reduced dermatitis on the lateral compartment during treatment. Additionally, BF significantly reduced pruritus and burning sensations. A larger study using a more reliable scoring method is required to clarify the effect of BF on radiation-associated skin toxicity. Cureus 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6682394/ /pubmed/31404344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4807 Text en Copyright © 2019, Lam et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Lam, Andrew CL Yu, Edward Vanwynsberghe, Danielle O'Neil, Melissa D'Souza, David Cao, Jeffrey Lock, Michael Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy |
title | Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy |
title_full | Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy |
title_fullStr | Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy |
title_short | Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy |
title_sort | phase iii randomized pair comparison of a barrier film vs. standard skin care in preventing radiation dermatitis in post-lumpectomy patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation therapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamandrewcl phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy AT yuedward phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy AT vanwynsberghedanielle phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy AT oneilmelissa phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy AT dsouzadavid phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy AT caojeffrey phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy AT lockmichael phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy |