Cargando…

Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

Introduction Patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast often experience radiation dermatitis ranging from mild erythema to moist desquamation. In post-lumpectomy patients, the axilla and inframammary fold are at an increased risk for friction dermatitis. Dermatitis can impact patients’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lam, Andrew CL, Yu, Edward, Vanwynsberghe, Danielle, O'Neil, Melissa, D'Souza, David, Cao, Jeffrey, Lock, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404344
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4807
_version_ 1783441887563087872
author Lam, Andrew CL
Yu, Edward
Vanwynsberghe, Danielle
O'Neil, Melissa
D'Souza, David
Cao, Jeffrey
Lock, Michael
author_facet Lam, Andrew CL
Yu, Edward
Vanwynsberghe, Danielle
O'Neil, Melissa
D'Souza, David
Cao, Jeffrey
Lock, Michael
author_sort Lam, Andrew CL
collection PubMed
description Introduction Patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast often experience radiation dermatitis ranging from mild erythema to moist desquamation. In post-lumpectomy patients, the axilla and inframammary fold are at an increased risk for friction dermatitis. Dermatitis can impact patients’ quality-of-life and may require treatment break/cessation. Our objectives are to assess the efficacy of 3M Cavilon Barrier Film (BF) in preventing and/or delaying the onset of grade-two dermatitis and reducing patient-reported sensation scores. Methods A total of 55 patients were randomized to receive BF on the medial or lateral breast. BF was applied twice weekly during treatment. Skin toxicity was evaluated weekly by a blinded clinical investigator using the Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT) and the modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Visual Assessment Score (RTOG VAS). On day one, baseline photographs were taken; seven-to-ten days post-treatment, patients returned for photographs, the STAT/RTOG VAS, and patient-opinion questions in the form of the global questionnaire. Results The paired analysis found BF did not significantly reduce dermatitis either during or post-treatment. However, the unpaired analysis found significantly reduced RTOG VAS on the lateral compartment during treatment (BF:0.91 vs. Control:1.21, p = 0.0408). This difference resolved post-treatment. Additionally, BF was able to reduce pruritus (p = 0.047) on the medial components and burning sensations on the lateral components (p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between the time-to-onset or proportion of patients who developed grade-two dermatitis. Conclusion In an unpaired analysis, BF significantly reduced dermatitis on the lateral compartment during treatment. Additionally, BF significantly reduced pruritus and burning sensations. A larger study using a more reliable scoring method is required to clarify the effect of BF on radiation-associated skin toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6682394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66823942019-08-09 Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Lam, Andrew CL Yu, Edward Vanwynsberghe, Danielle O'Neil, Melissa D'Souza, David Cao, Jeffrey Lock, Michael Cureus Radiation Oncology Introduction Patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast often experience radiation dermatitis ranging from mild erythema to moist desquamation. In post-lumpectomy patients, the axilla and inframammary fold are at an increased risk for friction dermatitis. Dermatitis can impact patients’ quality-of-life and may require treatment break/cessation. Our objectives are to assess the efficacy of 3M Cavilon Barrier Film (BF) in preventing and/or delaying the onset of grade-two dermatitis and reducing patient-reported sensation scores. Methods A total of 55 patients were randomized to receive BF on the medial or lateral breast. BF was applied twice weekly during treatment. Skin toxicity was evaluated weekly by a blinded clinical investigator using the Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT) and the modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Visual Assessment Score (RTOG VAS). On day one, baseline photographs were taken; seven-to-ten days post-treatment, patients returned for photographs, the STAT/RTOG VAS, and patient-opinion questions in the form of the global questionnaire. Results The paired analysis found BF did not significantly reduce dermatitis either during or post-treatment. However, the unpaired analysis found significantly reduced RTOG VAS on the lateral compartment during treatment (BF:0.91 vs. Control:1.21, p = 0.0408). This difference resolved post-treatment. Additionally, BF was able to reduce pruritus (p = 0.047) on the medial components and burning sensations on the lateral components (p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between the time-to-onset or proportion of patients who developed grade-two dermatitis. Conclusion In an unpaired analysis, BF significantly reduced dermatitis on the lateral compartment during treatment. Additionally, BF significantly reduced pruritus and burning sensations. A larger study using a more reliable scoring method is required to clarify the effect of BF on radiation-associated skin toxicity. Cureus 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6682394/ /pubmed/31404344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4807 Text en Copyright © 2019, Lam et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology
Lam, Andrew CL
Yu, Edward
Vanwynsberghe, Danielle
O'Neil, Melissa
D'Souza, David
Cao, Jeffrey
Lock, Michael
Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
title Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
title_full Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
title_short Phase III Randomized Pair Comparison of a Barrier Film vs. Standard Skin Care in Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Post-lumpectomy Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Therapy
title_sort phase iii randomized pair comparison of a barrier film vs. standard skin care in preventing radiation dermatitis in post-lumpectomy patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation therapy
topic Radiation Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404344
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4807
work_keys_str_mv AT lamandrewcl phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy
AT yuedward phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy
AT vanwynsberghedanielle phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy
AT oneilmelissa phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy
AT dsouzadavid phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy
AT caojeffrey phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy
AT lockmichael phaseiiirandomizedpaircomparisonofabarrierfilmvsstandardskincareinpreventingradiationdermatitisinpostlumpectomypatientswithbreastcancerreceivingadjuvantradiationtherapy